Difference between revisions of "PCD Technical Committee Action Items"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Items 110-119: format)
(Items 200 - 209)
 
(490 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Significant recent changes, other than dates, will be in bold.
 
Significant recent changes, other than dates, will be in bold.
  
==Items 60 - 69==
+
==Items 60 - 69 Are Closed ==
  
:{|border="2"
+
==Items 70-79 Are Closed==
|-
+
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
+
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action
+
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Owner
+
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Participants
+
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Due Date
+
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
+
!              align="left"  |Comments
+
  
|-
+
==Items 80-89 are closed==
| align="center" | 60
+
| '''<Action Item>''' |Update TF
+
| '''<Owner>:'''  |Todd, Ken
+
| '''<Participants>''' | John Rhoads
+
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2011.06.15
+
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab).
+
  
The update will include PIB, SPD. Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. A format change to the TF is anticipated. This would place the boiler plate into volume 0. Manny to develop the essential elements of the Integration Statements and check to see if the requirement for PCD-01 from the DOR to the DOF is clearly written. Robert is leading a group addressing the issues with PAM ITI-30 and 31. Paul noted that web services will provide additional benefits such as security. The profile updates to HL7 v 2.6 will be folded in. Dec. 9, 2009: Change date to Dec. 18. John Garguilo noted Bikram’s observation about OBR field lengths. He recommended discussion and decision, perhaps using RE for those not used. Paul noted that there will be CPs coming out of coordination with Continua. Feb. 24, 2010: Updating TF is in progress, addressing non-controversial items. A draft of Volume 2 will be available shortly. Volume 3, delayed, will contain much of what was in Volume 2. CPs for Continua harmonization will be incorporated before the revised TF is issued for ballot. June 30, 2010: Change date to Sept. 15. September 22, 2010: Todd is working on TF Volume 3 which will include what was Volume 2 Appendix D. Manny to ask Todd for a potential date. April 6, 2010: Change due date to April 27 and note open ballot. John Rhoads noted that one more CP regarding OBX-18 may come in response to the ballot. Then a new TI version will be developed with items not yet ready for FT. '''May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: FT will be balloted by June 15 and Ken, John will edit Volumes 1 and 2 for next iteration in the future.'''
+
==Items 90-99 are closed==
  
|-
+
==Items 100-109 are closed==
| align="center" | 66
+
| '''<Action Item>''' | HL7 IHE-PCD Integration (Message) Profiles (i.e., Message Workbench [MWB] profiles)
+
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo
+
| '''<Participants>''' | Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.
+
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2011.05.31
+
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab).
+
  
Gary volunteered to develop and maintain MWB profiles for three profiles, including tables (data type and others); initial versions are available and can be enhanced for future (cycles) use. Gary is maintaining MWB profiles and NIST bases/develops their message context validation files based on the MWB HL7 profiles.  Volunteers are requested to help on the other profiles (ACM PCD-04 through 08). For ACM, Monroe indicated that only PCD-04 is currently stable. Gary will work on PCD-04 as well. Manny will talk with Nick regarding IDCO (for PCD-09). Gary noted that the MWB tool permits building the message, while that is not available in the NIST tools. John Garguilo noted that the MWB also provides the capability to execute (or simulate) a sending/receiving system for testing. NIST is working on building Test Agents to achieve similar functionality and John will provide updates as the Agents are written in software. September 22, 2010: John Garguilo will ask members to take responsibility for maintaining the profiles and keep the latest version on the ftp site. Companies will be able to constrain these further. Gary will lead an effort to coordinate this. Manny indicated that the MWB and Peter Rontey’s tutorial are posted on the ftp site. If any changes are required members should send Manny an email. Peter has limited time available because his responsibilities have changed. He may have room in an upcoming tutorial but is not offering tutorials regularly. '''April 6, 2010: John Garguilo suggested that this will be less of an issue with further development of NIST tools. John Garguilo will take the lead and attempt to gather the latest versions. He noted that Peter Rontey is unable to maintain the tool, but it may still be useful as a system to test against until the NIST tool provides that service. Al noted that another use for the MWB is to have a local system. John Rhoads suggested that it also provides useful reports. HL7 continues to recognize the MWB as a tool. Al asked if the NIST tool will produce an XML conformance profile. The NIST tools will accept XML profiles and might provide the conformance profile to use in the MWB. This will permit the MWB profiles to be updated in synch with NIST updates. John Rhoads suggested that GForge be used for version control. Date changed to May 31. '''
+
==Items 110-119 are closed==
  
|}
+
==Items 120-129 are Closed==
 
+
==Items 70-79==
+
  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
|-
 
|-
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
 
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action
 
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Owner
 
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Participants
 
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Due Date
 
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
 
!              align="left"  |Comments
 
  
  
 
|}
 
|}
  
==Items 80-89==
+
==Items 130-139 are closed==
 +
 
 +
==Items 140-149  are Closed==
 +
 
 +
==Items 150-159 are Closed==
 +
 
 +
==Items 160-169 are Closed==
 +
 
 +
==Items 170-179 are Cosed==
 +
 
 +
==Items 180-189 are closed==
 +
 
 +
==Items 190-199==
  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
|-
 
|-
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
+
! width="5%"  align="center" |No.
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action
+
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action Item
 
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Owner
 
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Owner
! width="15%align="left"  |Participants
+
! width="5%   align="left"  |Participants
! width="5%align="left"  |Due Date
+
! width="10%   align="left"  |Due
! width="5%align="left"  |Status
+
! width="5%   align="left"  |Open/Closed
!              align="left"  |Comments
+
!              align="left"  |Description/Update
 +
 
  
  
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 82
+
| align="center" | 196
| '''<Action Item>''' | PCD OIDs & URNs
+
| '''<Action Item>''' | Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Todd, John Rhoads
+
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo
| '''<Participants>''' | John Garguilo
+
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2011.05.31
+
| '''<Due Date>'''  | July 7, 2021
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | For history see history tab.
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | From 2016 NA Connectathon. Status is in PCD TF v5 Vol2 page 119 at line 2890, but not in NIST Tool which only supports values from HL7 Table 0078.  We can suggest table changes to HL7, John will take this to HL7.
 +
April 21, 2016:  Values are in TF.  John will approach HL7 vocab group at their meeting in two weeks.  Anticipates no issue.  If not successful, will add XML table.  Set to PC&TC meeting May 18.
 +
:  May 18, 2016:  Couldn't find the term we wanted to add, please send it to John.  Change date to June 1.  Should be in Vol 2, reference to table 78.  Set to next TC meeting.
 +
:June 1, 2016:  Change to July 6 TC call.
 +
: July 6, 2016: Nothing new, set to next TC meeting.
 +
: Aug 3, 2016:  Nothing new, set to next TC meeting.
 +
: Sep 7, 2016:  Will try to present at HL7, set to Oct PC/TC meeting.  Set to Oct meeting.
 +
:Oct 5, 2016:  Contacted Vocabulary working group, almost done.  Will extend tables with appropriate codes.  A simple add to get the changes put in. Set to F2F.
 +
: Oct 12, 2016: Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78 – pp61 discusses it, we have values not in HL7.    HL7:  write up proposal for them to approve or not.  These are generic enough for other to use them, it is also a way to get some null values in there.  Can we create a local table to address it – Yes.  We will need to do that for the Connectathon.  But was only checked against HL7 table for DEC; need to add a local DEC table.  May want to define a write operation as well.  Targeting HL7 Jan 2017 to have values added to Table 3.9.4.1.2.5-3.  Set due date to Feb TC meeting.
 +
:Feb 1, 2017: Will submit to HL7 vocabulary group.  Will present to May HL7 meeting.  Review May 17th PC and TC.
 +
:May 17, 2017:  Needs some paperwork done and sent, should be done in a month.  Review June 21.
 +
:July 12, 2017:  Nothing new.  Review at Aug TC.
 +
:Aug 15, 2017:  No new information, move to Sep meeting.
 +
:Sep 27, 2017:  No update, effort to get these formally into HL7.  John will contact Ted Klein at HL7, set to Oct TC.
 +
:Oct 5 2017:  Validated and put in tool.  Contacted Ted Klein, moving forward.  Should be completed Nov 29.  Set to Dec TC.
 +
:Dec 20 2017:  John not available, move to Jan TC meeting.
 +
:Jan 3, 2018: No update, move to Feb TC.
 +
:Feb 7, 2018:  John still needs to submit something.  Set to March TC meeting.
 +
:Mar 21, 2018:  No update, move to Apr F2F.
 +
:April 12, 2018:  John not available, move to April PC&TC.
 +
:April 19, 2018:  No update, move to May TC meeting.
 +
: May 2, 2018:  Work continues, hope to make progress from HL7 meetings.  Set to June TC meeting.
 +
: June 13, 2018:  No new info, move the joint PC&TC meeting.
 +
: June 27, 2018:  John G not available, set to next TC meeting.
 +
: July 25, 2018:  No update yet, set to Sept TC meeting.
 +
: Aug 15, 2018:  John submitted info to Ted Klein, will need to follow up at HL7 meeting.  He can update at F2F.
 +
: Oct 18, 2018: John not available, move to next TC meeting.
 +
: Nov 5, 2018:  No new info, next HL& should provide update.  Set to Jan meeting.
 +
: Jan 2, 2019:  NIST unavailable, set to Feb meeting
 +
: Feb 6, 2019: John not here, move to Joint PC/TC
 +
: Mar 6, 2019: John not available, move to F2F
 +
: Apr 25, 2019: John will get it in as soon as he can. Review in June
 +
: June 5, 2019: John not on call, set to July meeting
 +
: July 10, 2019:  No change, move to August
 +
: Aug 7, 2019: Checks data validity. John not available, move to next month.
 +
: Sep 4, 2019: No update, move to next month.
 +
: Nov 6, 2019:  No update, move to Dec.
 +
: Dec 4, 2019: Review after next HL7 meeting. Move to March.
 +
: March 4, 2020:  John not available, move to April meetings
 +
: April 1, 2020:  May HL7 cancelled, unable to do anything for now, move to September meeting.
 +
: Sept 2, 2020: HL7 meeting this month, move to F2F
 +
: Oct 8, 2020: No update.  Move to February.
 +
: Feb 3, 2021: John not available, move to next meeting.
 +
: Mar 10, 2021:  Nothing new, need to talk to Ted Cline.  Review after HL7 meetings, set to June.
 +
: April 29, 2021:  Found a new way to work on this.  They have weekly meetings, so will try to get it on their agenda.  Hope to make progress by HL7 meeting week last of May.  Review June 2.
 +
: '''June 2, 2021:  John not available, review July meeting.'''
 +
 
  
There is an IHE PCD OID page. The IHE Domain Coordination Committee has had a very active discussion re. the management of OIDs within IHE. OIDs will be available when needed. Dec. 9, 2009: Robert reported no news; change to Feb. 4. August 31, 2010: John Garguilo edited action item 67 which needs to follow the management principles established for this action item - 82.  See OID page: [[http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_OID_Management]]''' April 6, 2011: Refers to IHE GForge. The next step is to document its usage. Change date to May 31. '''
 
  
 
|}
 
|}
  
==Items 90-99==
+
==Items 200 - 209==
 +
 
  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
:{|border="2"  
Line 94: Line 122:
 
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
 
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
 
!              align="left"  |Comments
 
!              align="left"  |Comments
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 93
+
| align="center" | 200
| '''<Action Item>''' | Managing Document Versions
+
| '''<Action Item>''' | MDS, Containment and VMD Requirements
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Rhoads
+
| '''<Owners>:'''  | Paul Schluter
 
| '''<Participants>''' |  
 
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2011.04.31
+
| '''<Due Date>'''  | Aug 4, 2021
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Status>''' | Open
| '''<Comments>:'''  | F2F:  research the use of GForge. Feb. 24, 2010: John Rhoads to discuss with Steve Moore. June 30, 2010: John R has received approval to use GForge. Change date to Sept. 30, 2010.''' April 6, 2011: The next step is to document its usage. Change date to May 31. '''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | June 27, 2018:  Created.  Need to make consistent, so they can be applied uniformly by NIST tool.  Set to next TC meeting
|}
+
: July 25, 2018: No update yet, move to F2F TC meeting.
 +
: Oct 18, 2018: Loose, not tested by NIST tools. Required disclosure at CMI. Need to assemble ‘uber’ models. How rigorous. Part may include retrofitting specificity in TF. May need general x-type path. May be able to use a tool like FHIR’s to create the containment models. Also want to clearly state what containment is. Discussed options and current process with some examples. Need to work out wrinkles for multiple devices doing the same thing. Need to solve persistence issue. Example: BP monitoring channels, when expanding channels, need to ensure the original maintains its channel number. Discussed different IV pump models as well as monitoring. Found a challenge with ACM; Alarms and other messages. If the alarm is in the first message, then another message is generated with another field completed, the alarm may not be at the same location in the message. Oliver will draft a White Paper to address MDS, persistence and channel identification, what works, doesn’t work and mine fields. He has a lot of notes already. Will review Dec TC meeting.
 +
:Dec 19, 2018 - Using it, NIST working on it. Until 10101r is out the door, won’t be able to focus on it.  Not sure next stage of ‘done’ is.  Push out to February, and discuss at DPI meetings.
 +
: Feb 6, 2019: Nothing right now, move to next TC.
 +
: Mar 6, 2019: Should be able to start on it again soon.  Review next PC&TC
 +
: Mar 20, 2019:  No new info, could use a ½ hour discussion at F2F.  Set to F2F
 +
: Apr 25, 2019Related to the OBX-4 question, need to figure out what to do. It is a ‘should’, do we make it a ‘shall’? If so, we need to let implementer know well before Connectathon. Include Lexicographic order. Move out to June meeting.
 +
: June 5, 2019: Tabled for now, move to July
 +
: July, 10, 2019: Paul not here, fair amount of discussion recently. Michael Faughn working on RTMMS, which will help.  Also need to work on TF and IGAMPT.  Move to August
 +
:-Aug 7, 2019: Will work on it after Events and Alerts.  Michael and Nicholas will work on it when they have time. Move to September.
 +
: Sep 4, 2019: Should be able to convene a call and take care of it.  Move to October
 +
: Nov 6, 2019:  Some progress, move to Dec.
 +
: Dec 4, 2019: No new info, move to Feb.
 +
: Feb 5, 2020: Making progress, move to F2F.
 +
: Apr 23, 2020 - Containment modeling important, can resolve problems, especially during Connectathon.  Asking those that need terms to create containment models.  This limits the need for inspecting messages by hand, as computers are much better at it.  He, Michael, and Brian are working on consistent output data as well.  NIST is working with CDC on a similar issues regarding COVID-19 tracking.  Inconsistent data quality is an issue for them as well.  John G – Nicholas will have some info that will help later during F2F.  Move to next F2F.
 +
: Oct 8, 2020 - Should be resolved with Pump group and work with Michael Faughn. Move out to January call.
 +
: Jan 6, 2021 - Will wrap up when Michael Faughn can focus on it.  Review next month.
 +
: Feb 3, 2021 - Still working on it - Michael Faughn still working on another project.  Move to March. Add 'Containment' to title.
 +
: Mar 10, 2021:  Michael Faughn still porting Rosetta. Paul wrote a containment model.  Pathway figured out, should be able to move forward and use with other devices.  Review in May.
 +
: '''April 29, 2021: Coupled with Michael Faughn's availability. Been capturing terms at various workgroup meetings.  Set to August meeting.'''
  
==Items 100-109==
 
  
:{|border="2"
 
 
|-
 
|-
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
+
| align="center" | 202
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action
+
| '''<Action Item>''' | MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Owner
+
| '''<Owner>:''' | Monroe Pattillo
! width="15%" align="left"  |Participants
+
| '''<Participants>''' | Dalibor, John Rhoads
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Due Date
+
| '''<Due Date>''' | July 7, 2021
! width="5%" align="left"  |Status
+
| '''<Status>''' | Open
!              align="left"  |Comments
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Apr 25, 2019: MEMDMC profile to change via CP to use a message template of ORU_R(as allocated by O&O) which affords it the ability to make the usage of the PID and PV1 segments as optional for MEMDMC use cases.  If PID and/or PV1 segments are present they should be populated per the IHE PCD TF.  We did this with ACM, so should be able to do so in MEM.
 +
: May 1, 2019: Getting a new trigger event from HL7.  We can start testing to this.  Won’t make official until HL7 releases new normative.  Will need to talk to NIST about flagging this in testing.  Set to June TC.
 +
: June 5, 2019: Dalibor not here, move to July meeting.
 +
: July 10, 2019:  Nothing new, move to August.
 +
: Aug 7, 2019: HL7 change, NIST tool isn't clear on how to communicate needed info.  Add John Rhoads to Participant list.
 +
: Sep 4, 2019:  Up to HL7 meeting to communicate MEMDMC msg.  Conflict in use of PID segment.  MEMDMC needs it’s own trigger.  Monroe will send to John G for the agenda.  Move to October.
 +
: Nov 6, 2019:  At HL7 O&O.  They have a huge backlog, will take time.  Problem with HL7 standard, a bit of an unstable reference loop.  Is it possible to ‘pre-adopt’ the triggers?  Yes, if HL7 says they will create them.  Move to Dec.
 +
: Dec 4, 2019: Still waiting on HL7.  Review in March.
 +
: March 4, 2020: Waiting for HL7.  In the queue, not discussed yet.  Needs a promoter on the committee at HL7 O&O to ensure it’s addressed.  John Rhoads will disuss with a member.  Move to F2F.
 +
: Apr 23, 2020 - Once triggers are officially committed by HL7, they can implement it.  Monroe isn’t sure should be actually owner of this.  John Rhoads talks to O&O a lot.  They have a lot to do with limited resources.  He will take ownership.  Move to next F2F.
 +
: Oct 8, 2020: In HL7 queue, move to February, after HL7 meeting.
 +
: Feb 3, 2021 - Need new MEM trigger to avoid PHI info.  Move to spring F2F.
 +
: April 29, 2021:  Passed it into HL7 Orders and Observations, out of their hands now.  Has Monroe contacted Hans?  John will send his contact to Monroe.  Set to June meeting.
 +
: '''June 2, 2021: Monroe sent email to liaison, not reply yet.  Move to July.'''
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 106
+
| align="center" | 206
 
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
 
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
PCIM
 
 
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
 
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
 
| '''<Participants>''' |  
 
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | May 31, 2011.
+
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Status>''' |  
 
| '''<Comments>:'''  |  
 
| '''<Comments>:'''  |  
June 30: Possibly to include interim document. April 6, 2010: Change name to PCI from PDA. Change date.''' '''May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: : Manny and the cochairs of the WG will establish meeting times and Webex support for the PCIM WG. Doodle survey is out.  '''
 
  
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 108
+
| align="center" | 207
| '''<Action Item>''' | Prioritize Escalated Alarms
+
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Monroe Pattillo
+
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | ACM WG
+
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | December 8, 2010
+
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Status>''' |  
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Wednesday, Oct. 20: ACM - AC will prioritize alarm and communication when messages are escalated. ACM will add a requirement to notify the person receiving an escalated message that the alarm has been escalated and has an associated delay from the initial alarm. The AC may make decisions on how to prioritize and escalate the message. This may have implications for the AM and perhaps AR. '''April 6, 2010: Change date to May 31. '''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" | 208
 +
| '''<Action Item>''' |
 +
| '''<Owner>:''' |
 +
| '''<Participants>''' |
 +
| '''<Due Date>'''  |
 +
| '''<Status>''' |
 +
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
  
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 109
+
| align="center" | 209
| '''<Action Item>''' | Messages Without Patient Demographics
+
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Jeff Rinda
+
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | Pump WG
+
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | May 4, 2011
+
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Status>''' |  
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Wednesday, Oct. 20: Pumps (and other devices) sending device data in absence of patient demographics. (PIV initiated, to be discussed in Nov. 17th TC meeting)
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
''' April 6, 2010: Jeff summarized the issue as whether PCD-01 requires patient identity. John Rhoads noted that this is related to PCIM and raises questions about archived data. Change lead to John Rhoads and date to May 4. '''
+
  
  
 
|}
 
|}
  
==Items 110-119==
+
==Tracking Related Items, 1-20 ==
  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
 
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action
+
! width="50%"  align="left"  |Item and Relationships
! width="5%"  align="left"   |Owner
+
! width="5%  align="left"  |Date Added to List
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Participants
+
! width="5%   align="left"  |Date Closed
! width="5%align="left"  |Due Date
+
!              align="left"  |Description/Update
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
+
!              align="left"  |Comments
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 110
+
| align="center" | 1
| '''<Action Item>''' | WCM Attributes
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Paul Schluter
+
VA proposal on PulseOx - write up details / issues to TC (Ioana S./Greg S.). Provide mappings to x73 of what VA has from LOINC & SNOMED CT - VA to encode (encode all information?)
| '''<Participants>''' | Ken Fuchs
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  | F2F Oct. 2011
| '''<Due Date>'''  | December 8, 2010
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Comments>:''' | Thursday, Oct. 21: Document ways of representing waveform attributes. Ken suggested similar action for PCD-02. To be discussed Nov 3rd TC meeting. ''' April 6, 2011: Change date to May 11. Add to agenda for the F2F. '''
+
   
 
+
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 111
+
| align="center" | 2
| '''<Action Item>''' | MEM Networked Medical Device Proposal
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Axel
+
DCM (Detailed Clinical Model for Devices) - Develop/provide a publication in a form that will be given to IHE-PCD (Ioana S.) due
| '''<Participants>''' | John Rhoads, Dominick, Richard, Ken, Khalil
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  | F2F Oct. 2011
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 15, 2011
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' | Oct 5, 2017
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''   | Oct 5, 2017: Reviewed at F2F. Unanimous decision by TC to sunset this item.
| '''<Comments>:''' | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Axel will update the proposal and recruit a WG from the vendor and CE-IT community to prioritize and disseminate aspects as they are addressed. Ken suggested that ITI expertise and collaboration are desired, and that ITI may want to take the lead. John Garguilo noted that NIST has done some work in this area that may be helpful. He will investigate and bring the information to this WG. John Rhoads, Dominick, Richard, Ken, and Khalil volunteered and Brad offered to seek a Carefusion representative.  
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 112
+
| align="center" | 3
| '''<Action Item>''' | RTM and IEEE, HL7 for MEM
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' | SFT Segment - Desire to include info from pumps, software segment preferred.
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Paul
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  | F2F April 12, 2018
| '''<Participants>''' | Steve Merritt
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 29, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Steve provided a list of MEM data to Paul for discussion at the recent IEEE meeting. It wasn’t addressed at the meeting.
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 113
+
| align="center" | 4
| '''<Action Item>''' | RTM and IEEE, HL7 for WCM
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Paul
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | Ken
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 29, 2011 RTM, Sept. 1, 2011 for IEEE
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Paul and Ken took the WCM parameter list to the recent IEEE meeting to seek codes for those attributes currently lacking definition. This will be an ongoing effort. Some will need to be maintained as Rosetta and not IEEE terms. John Garguilo noted that terminology life cycles were discussed at the IEEE meeting. It was documented and is available from John. Some new terms begin within the RTM, having term codes of zero and then are submitted to the IEEE. Due June 29 for RTM, September 1 for IEEE.
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 114
+
| align="center" | 5
| '''<Action Item>''' | Revise Existing, Develop New Tests
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Manny, John Garguilo
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | WG Members
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | August 1, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Manny to facilitate efforts by NIST, vendors and him to review and update the tests over the next several months. Parts of two meetings have addressed DEC tests and there have been robust discussion to date. John and Manny may request time in the WGs’ meetings for detailed discussion of the other tests. August 1. Manny to seek time on WG agendas for the reviews.
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 115
+
| align="center" | 6
| '''<Action Item>''' | Pump WG CPs
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Brad
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | Pump WG
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 15, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Manny asked the Pump WG to consider a CP to add the final step of user approval to initiate infusion to the technical documentation. This was discussed last week in the WG meeting and withdrawn as out of scope. Brad is making some changes to the CPs in development and they will then be balloted. The CPs will be balloted together, soon.
+
 
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 116
+
| align="center" | 7
| '''<Action Item>''' | IDCO CPs
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Tom, Nick
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | IDCO WG
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 29, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Tom and Nick will move the CPs to have them available for ballot no later than the end of June.
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 117
+
| align="center" | 8
| '''<Action Item>''' | IDCO Time Stamp WP
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Tom, Nick
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | IDCO WG, Paul
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 29, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Paul will work with IDCO on the time stamp WP. June 29 for status report.
+
  
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 118
+
| align="center" | 9
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |  
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
 
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 119
+
| align="center" | 10
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
  
 
|}
 
 
==Items 120-129==
 
 
:{|border="2"
 
 
|-
 
|-
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
+
| align="center" | 11
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Owner
+
| '''<Date Added>:''' |  
! width="15%" align="left"  |Participants
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Due Date
+
| '''<Description/Update>''' |  
! width="5%" align="left"  |Status
+
!              align="left"  |Comments
+
 
+
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 120
+
| align="center" | 12
| '''<Action Item>''' | MEM Networked Medical Device Proposal
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Axel
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | John Rhoads, Dominick, Richard, Ken, Khalil
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | June 15, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Axel will update the proposal and recruit a WG from the vendor and CE-IT community to prioritize and disseminate aspects as they are addressed. Ken suggested that ITI expertise and collaboration are desired, and that ITI may want to take the lead. John Garguilo noted that NIST has done some work in this area that may be helpful. He will investigate and bring the information to this WG. John Rhoads, Dominick, Richard, Ken, and Khalil volunteered and Brad offered to seek a Carefusion representative.
+
|-
+
| align="center" | 121
+
| '''<Action Item>''' | RTM and IEEE, HL7 for MEM
+
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Paul
+
| '''<Participants>''' | Steve Merritt
+
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 29, 2011
+
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Steve provided a list of MEM data to Paul for discussion at the recent IEEE meeting. It wasn’t addressed at the meeting.
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 122
+
| align="center" | 13
| '''<Action Item>''' | RTM and IEEE, HL7 for WCM
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Paul
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | Ken
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 29, 2011 RTM, Sept. 1, 2011 for IEEE
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Paul and Ken took the WCM parameter list to the recent IEEE meeting to seek codes for those attributes currently lacking definition. This will be an ongoing effort. Some will need to be maintained as Rosetta and not IEEE terms. John Garguilo noted that terminology life cycles were discussed at the IEEE meeting. It was documented and is available from John. Some new terms begin within the RTM, having term codes of zero and then are submitted to the IEEE. Due June 29 for RTM, September 1 for IEEE.
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 123
+
| align="center" | 14
| '''<Action Item>''' | Revise Existing, Develop New Tests
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Manny, John Garguilo
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | WG Members
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | August 1, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Manny to facilitate efforts by NIST, vendors and him to review and update the tests over the next several months. Parts of two meetings have addressed DEC tests and there have been robust discussion to date. John and Manny may request time in the WGs’ meetings for detailed discussion of the other tests. August 1. Manny to seek time on WG agendas for the reviews.
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 124
+
| align="center" | 15
| '''<Action Item>''' | Pump WG CPs
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Brad
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | Pump WG
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 15, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Manny asked the Pump WG to consider a CP to add the final step of user approval to initiate infusion to the technical documentation. This was discussed last week in the WG meeting and withdrawn as out of scope. Brad is making some changes to the CPs in development and they will then be balloted. The CPs will be balloted together, soon.
+
 
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 125
+
| align="center" | 16
| '''<Action Item>''' | IDCO CPs
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Tom, Nick
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | IDCO WG
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 29, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Tom and Nick will move the CPs to have them available for ballot no later than the end of June.
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 126
+
| align="center" | 17
| '''<Action Item>''' | IDCO Time Stamp WP
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  | Tom, Nick
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' | IDCO WG, Paul
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' | June 29, 2011
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | May 2011 F2F, reviewed by TC June 1: Paul will work with IDCO on the time stamp WP. June 29 for status report.
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 127
+
| align="center" | 18
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |  
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
 
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 128
+
| align="center" | 19
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |  
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
 
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 129
+
| align="center" | 20
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
  
Line 367: Line 377:
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
+
==Tracking Related Items, 21-40 ==
==Items 130-139==
+
  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
 
! width="5%"  align="center" |Number
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Action
+
! width="50%"  align="left"  |Item and Relationships
! width="5%"  align="left"   |Owner
+
! width="5%  align="left"  |Date Added to List
! width="15%"  align="left"  |Participants
+
! width="5%   align="left"  |Date Closed
! width="5%align="left"  |Due Date
+
!              align="left"  |Description/Update
! width="5%"  align="left"  |Status
+
!              align="left"  |Comments
+
 
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 130
+
| align="center" | 21
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |  
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
   
| '''<Comments>:''' |
+
 
+
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 131
+
| align="center" | 22
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 132
+
| align="center" | 23
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
 
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 133
+
| align="center" | 24
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 134
+
| align="center" | 25
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 135
+
| align="center" | 26
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 136
+
| align="center" | 27
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 137
+
| align="center" | 28
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |  
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
 
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 138
+
| align="center" | 29
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>''' |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 139
+
| align="center" | 30
| '''<Action Item>''' |  
+
| '''<Item and Relationships>''' |  
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
+
| '''<Date Added>:'''  |  
| '''<Participants>''' |  
+
| '''<Date Closed>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  |  
+
| '''<Description/Update>'''  |  
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
+
 
| '''<Comments>:'''  |
+
  
  
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
See also [[PCD Technical Committee Closed Action Items]] page.
  
 
=='''Links to PCD TC Meetings'''==
 
=='''Links to PCD TC Meetings'''==
Line 482: Line 471:
  
 
[[Category:PCD]]
 
[[Category:PCD]]
 +
[[Category:PCD Reference Pages]]

Latest revision as of 09:28, 2 June 2021

See also PCD Technical Committee Closed Action Items page.

To see changes between current and last(or any earlier) versions of the action item list, click the history tab at the top of the page, select versions to compare and click compare command.

Significant recent changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Items 60 - 69 Are Closed

Items 70-79 Are Closed

Items 80-89 are closed

Items 90-99 are closed

Items 100-109 are closed

Items 110-119 are closed

Items 120-129 are Closed

Items 130-139 are closed

Items 140-149 are Closed

Items 150-159 are Closed

Items 160-169 are Closed

Items 170-179 are Cosed

Items 180-189 are closed

Items 190-199

No. Action Item Owner Participants Due Open/Closed Description/Update



196 Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78 John Garguilo July 7, 2021 OPEN From 2016 NA Connectathon. Status is in PCD TF v5 Vol2 page 119 at line 2890, but not in NIST Tool which only supports values from HL7 Table 0078. We can suggest table changes to HL7, John will take this to HL7.

April 21, 2016: Values are in TF. John will approach HL7 vocab group at their meeting in two weeks. Anticipates no issue. If not successful, will add XML table. Set to PC&TC meeting May 18.

May 18, 2016: Couldn't find the term we wanted to add, please send it to John. Change date to June 1. Should be in Vol 2, reference to table 78. Set to next TC meeting.
June 1, 2016: Change to July 6 TC call.
July 6, 2016: Nothing new, set to next TC meeting.
Aug 3, 2016: Nothing new, set to next TC meeting.
Sep 7, 2016: Will try to present at HL7, set to Oct PC/TC meeting. Set to Oct meeting.
Oct 5, 2016: Contacted Vocabulary working group, almost done. Will extend tables with appropriate codes. A simple add to get the changes put in. Set to F2F.
Oct 12, 2016: Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78 – pp61 discusses it, we have values not in HL7. HL7: write up proposal for them to approve or not. These are generic enough for other to use them, it is also a way to get some null values in there. Can we create a local table to address it – Yes. We will need to do that for the Connectathon. But was only checked against HL7 table for DEC; need to add a local DEC table. May want to define a write operation as well. Targeting HL7 Jan 2017 to have values added to Table 3.9.4.1.2.5-3. Set due date to Feb TC meeting.
Feb 1, 2017: Will submit to HL7 vocabulary group. Will present to May HL7 meeting. Review May 17th PC and TC.
May 17, 2017: Needs some paperwork done and sent, should be done in a month. Review June 21.
July 12, 2017: Nothing new. Review at Aug TC.
Aug 15, 2017: No new information, move to Sep meeting.
Sep 27, 2017: No update, effort to get these formally into HL7. John will contact Ted Klein at HL7, set to Oct TC.
Oct 5 2017: Validated and put in tool. Contacted Ted Klein, moving forward. Should be completed Nov 29. Set to Dec TC.
Dec 20 2017: John not available, move to Jan TC meeting.
Jan 3, 2018: No update, move to Feb TC.
Feb 7, 2018: John still needs to submit something. Set to March TC meeting.
Mar 21, 2018: No update, move to Apr F2F.
April 12, 2018: John not available, move to April PC&TC.
April 19, 2018: No update, move to May TC meeting.
May 2, 2018: Work continues, hope to make progress from HL7 meetings. Set to June TC meeting.
June 13, 2018: No new info, move the joint PC&TC meeting.
June 27, 2018: John G not available, set to next TC meeting.
July 25, 2018: No update yet, set to Sept TC meeting.
Aug 15, 2018: John submitted info to Ted Klein, will need to follow up at HL7 meeting. He can update at F2F.
Oct 18, 2018: John not available, move to next TC meeting.
Nov 5, 2018: No new info, next HL& should provide update. Set to Jan meeting.
Jan 2, 2019: NIST unavailable, set to Feb meeting
Feb 6, 2019: John not here, move to Joint PC/TC
Mar 6, 2019: John not available, move to F2F
Apr 25, 2019: John will get it in as soon as he can. Review in June
June 5, 2019: John not on call, set to July meeting
July 10, 2019: No change, move to August
Aug 7, 2019: Checks data validity. John not available, move to next month.
Sep 4, 2019: No update, move to next month.
Nov 6, 2019: No update, move to Dec.
Dec 4, 2019: Review after next HL7 meeting. Move to March.
March 4, 2020: John not available, move to April meetings
April 1, 2020: May HL7 cancelled, unable to do anything for now, move to September meeting.
Sept 2, 2020: HL7 meeting this month, move to F2F
Oct 8, 2020: No update. Move to February.
Feb 3, 2021: John not available, move to next meeting.
Mar 10, 2021: Nothing new, need to talk to Ted Cline. Review after HL7 meetings, set to June.
April 29, 2021: Found a new way to work on this. They have weekly meetings, so will try to get it on their agenda. Hope to make progress by HL7 meeting week last of May. Review June 2.
June 2, 2021: John not available, review July meeting.


Items 200 - 209

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
200 MDS, Containment and VMD Requirements Paul Schluter Aug 4, 2021 Open June 27, 2018: Created. Need to make consistent, so they can be applied uniformly by NIST tool. Set to next TC meeting
July 25, 2018: No update yet, move to F2F TC meeting.
Oct 18, 2018: Loose, not tested by NIST tools. Required disclosure at CMI. Need to assemble ‘uber’ models. How rigorous. Part may include retrofitting specificity in TF. May need general x-type path. May be able to use a tool like FHIR’s to create the containment models. Also want to clearly state what containment is. Discussed options and current process with some examples. Need to work out wrinkles for multiple devices doing the same thing. Need to solve persistence issue. Example: BP monitoring channels, when expanding channels, need to ensure the original maintains its channel number. Discussed different IV pump models as well as monitoring. Found a challenge with ACM; Alarms and other messages. If the alarm is in the first message, then another message is generated with another field completed, the alarm may not be at the same location in the message. Oliver will draft a White Paper to address MDS, persistence and channel identification, what works, doesn’t work and mine fields. He has a lot of notes already. Will review Dec TC meeting.
Dec 19, 2018 - Using it, NIST working on it. Until 10101r is out the door, won’t be able to focus on it. Not sure next stage of ‘done’ is. Push out to February, and discuss at DPI meetings.
Feb 6, 2019: Nothing right now, move to next TC.
Mar 6, 2019: Should be able to start on it again soon. Review next PC&TC
Mar 20, 2019: No new info, could use a ½ hour discussion at F2F. Set to F2F
Apr 25, 2019Related to the OBX-4 question, need to figure out what to do. It is a ‘should’, do we make it a ‘shall’? If so, we need to let implementer know well before Connectathon. Include Lexicographic order. Move out to June meeting.
June 5, 2019: Tabled for now, move to July
July, 10, 2019: Paul not here, fair amount of discussion recently. Michael Faughn working on RTMMS, which will help. Also need to work on TF and IGAMPT. Move to August
-Aug 7, 2019: Will work on it after Events and Alerts. Michael and Nicholas will work on it when they have time. Move to September.
Sep 4, 2019: Should be able to convene a call and take care of it. Move to October
Nov 6, 2019: Some progress, move to Dec.
Dec 4, 2019: No new info, move to Feb.
Feb 5, 2020: Making progress, move to F2F.
Apr 23, 2020 - Containment modeling important, can resolve problems, especially during Connectathon. Asking those that need terms to create containment models. This limits the need for inspecting messages by hand, as computers are much better at it. He, Michael, and Brian are working on consistent output data as well. NIST is working with CDC on a similar issues regarding COVID-19 tracking. Inconsistent data quality is an issue for them as well. John G – Nicholas will have some info that will help later during F2F. Move to next F2F.
Oct 8, 2020 - Should be resolved with Pump group and work with Michael Faughn. Move out to January call.
Jan 6, 2021 - Will wrap up when Michael Faughn can focus on it. Review next month.
Feb 3, 2021 - Still working on it - Michael Faughn still working on another project. Move to March. Add 'Containment' to title.
Mar 10, 2021: Michael Faughn still porting Rosetta. Paul wrote a containment model. Pathway figured out, should be able to move forward and use with other devices. Review in May.
April 29, 2021: Coupled with Michael Faughn's availability. Been capturing terms at various workgroup meetings. Set to August meeting.


202 MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional Monroe Pattillo Dalibor, John Rhoads July 7, 2021 Open Apr 25, 2019: MEMDMC profile to change via CP to use a message template of ORU_R(as allocated by O&O) which affords it the ability to make the usage of the PID and PV1 segments as optional for MEMDMC use cases. If PID and/or PV1 segments are present they should be populated per the IHE PCD TF. We did this with ACM, so should be able to do so in MEM.
May 1, 2019: Getting a new trigger event from HL7. We can start testing to this. Won’t make official until HL7 releases new normative. Will need to talk to NIST about flagging this in testing. Set to June TC.
June 5, 2019: Dalibor not here, move to July meeting.
July 10, 2019: Nothing new, move to August.
Aug 7, 2019: HL7 change, NIST tool isn't clear on how to communicate needed info. Add John Rhoads to Participant list.
Sep 4, 2019: Up to HL7 meeting to communicate MEMDMC msg. Conflict in use of PID segment. MEMDMC needs it’s own trigger. Monroe will send to John G for the agenda. Move to October.
Nov 6, 2019: At HL7 O&O. They have a huge backlog, will take time. Problem with HL7 standard, a bit of an unstable reference loop. Is it possible to ‘pre-adopt’ the triggers? Yes, if HL7 says they will create them. Move to Dec.
Dec 4, 2019: Still waiting on HL7. Review in March.
March 4, 2020: Waiting for HL7. In the queue, not discussed yet. Needs a promoter on the committee at HL7 O&O to ensure it’s addressed. John Rhoads will disuss with a member. Move to F2F.
Apr 23, 2020 - Once triggers are officially committed by HL7, they can implement it. Monroe isn’t sure should be actually owner of this. John Rhoads talks to O&O a lot. They have a lot to do with limited resources. He will take ownership. Move to next F2F.
Oct 8, 2020: In HL7 queue, move to February, after HL7 meeting.
Feb 3, 2021 - Need new MEM trigger to avoid PHI info. Move to spring F2F.
April 29, 2021: Passed it into HL7 Orders and Observations, out of their hands now. Has Monroe contacted Hans? John will send his contact to Monroe. Set to June meeting.
June 2, 2021: Monroe sent email to liaison, not reply yet. Move to July.
206


207
208


209


Tracking Related Items, 1-20

Number Item and Relationships Date Added to List Date Closed Description/Update
1

VA proposal on PulseOx - write up details / issues to TC (Ioana S./Greg S.). Provide mappings to x73 of what VA has from LOINC & SNOMED CT - VA to encode (encode all information?)

F2F Oct. 2011
2

DCM (Detailed Clinical Model for Devices) - Develop/provide a publication in a form that will be given to IHE-PCD (Ioana S.) due

F2F Oct. 2011 Oct 5, 2017 Oct 5, 2017: Reviewed at F2F. Unanimous decision by TC to sunset this item.
3 SFT Segment - Desire to include info from pumps, software segment preferred. F2F April 12, 2018
4
5
6
7
8


9


10


11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18


19


20


Tracking Related Items, 21-40

Number Item and Relationships Date Added to List Date Closed Description/Update
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


29


30


See also PCD Technical Committee Closed Action Items page.

Links to PCD TC Meetings

Go to most recent/past meetings or next meeting Category: PCD Meeting

Patient Care Device home