Difference between revisions of "PCD TC 2010-07-14 Webex"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Discussion: complete the discussion summary)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 110: Line 110:
 
| '''Action Items''' <br>- Chairs
 
| '''Action Items''' <br>- Chairs
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
'''Deferred'''   
+
 
 +
:: '''Deferred'''   
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 126: Line 127:
  
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
+
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]]

Latest revision as of 20:46, 4 September 2010

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

Regularly Scheduled TC Meeting

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Technical Committee Meeting

Regularly Scheduled Meeting


Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York)

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

  1. Agenda Approval
  2. Review Discussion Summaries: June 30 PCD TC 2010-06-30 Webex
  3. General CP Ballot Update
  1. PIV CP ballots
4. TC Co-Chair Nominations Update
5. Profile Update
  1. TF update update
  2. DEC CP for MLLP (default) or WS Transports
  3. IDCO CP?
  4. TF clarification (editorial only - no CP) that only ER7 are allowed
  5. Reminder of HL7 2.6
  6. WCM Early Comments:
  1. Use of OBX-4 ... foundational!
  2. Use of multiple OBR's to segregate wave data (e.g., alarm evidentiary info)
7. ACM Trigger CP?
6. WAN Testing Event Update
  1. IHE Korea Connectathon Update
7. RDC Update
8. Terminology Update
9. Tooling Update
10. October Meetings
  1. IEEE 11073 + HL7 ... agenda items?
  2. ISO TC215
  3. PCD F2F (esp. call for profile proposals)
11. Action Item Review
12. Additional Business
13. Next Meetings

Action Items from Previous Meetings

See PCD Technical Committee Action Items.

Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Participants

Chair: Ken Fuchs
Jon Blasingame, Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, John Hotchkiss, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Paul Schluter, Tom Schultz, Ioana Signureanu, Erin Sparnon, Nick Steblay, Rabin Shrestha, Jan Wittenber, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst

Discussion

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Agenda approved with the addition of DCM after item 7 and the addition of PDQ to Item 9.

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • Discussion Summary of previous meeting was accepted

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Agenda Items
- Item Leaders
Status/Discussion:
  • 3.1 PIV has passed, but there were some issues raised that the Pump WG will address.
  • 4. Cochair nominations – timetable remains up in the air due to HIMSS. Nominations are encouraged.
  • 5.
5.1 TF update volumes 1, 2 should be out for discussion and approval to publish for public comment soon.
5.2 PCD-01 for WAN interface: will be tested in Seoul in August and in Chicago in January. The question is whether WS should be an option in PCD-01 or a new profile (PCD-10). Recommendation is to make MLLP and WS options, with MLLP a default in selecting registration. This requires a CP, which John Rhoads will develop.
5.3 IDCO WG may submit non-controversial CPs for this testing cycle, with the more controversial CPs coming later.
5.4 ER7 is proposed as the only coding method: no one uses the XML version, but it does provide an easier to understand document. The proposal is to make it clear that the XML versions in the document are for illustration only. Ioana recommended that XML not be used for illustration to avoid confusion. There was a consensus agreement with Ioana’s recommendation. She suggested that the MWB can be used to provide a graphical representation to accompany the ER7.
5.5 Reminder baseline is version 2.6.
5.6 Early comments on WCM public comment forum:
5.6.1: Use of OBX-4: Ioana indicated that OBX-4 is useful, but it may confuse things; this can be improved by using a “structured segment group”. Paul suggested that evidentiary snippets in WCM be at the same level as in PCD-01. He noted that we have already gone to 5 levels. Also, most of the RTM items are only one level; e.g., there are a few in PIV that require more levels. Maintaining the current approach permits all the important items to be sent in one message.
5.6.2: Todd suggested a WCM meeting to discuss this.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s): Manny to set the WCM meeting.

4 Action Items
- Chairs
Status/Discussion:
Deferred

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):



Next Meeting

The next meeting will be July 28 PCD TC 2010-07-28 Webex

PCD Home