Difference between revisions of "PCD TC 2009-06-03 Webex"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Proposed Agenda: add to the agenda)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
== Discussion Summary or Minutes and Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
 
== Discussion Summary or Minutes and Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
  
'''placeholder - needs updating with May 20 meeting'''
+
'''Updated with May 20 meeting'''
  
 
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.
 
Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.
Line 49: Line 49:
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Meetings have begun. The update will include PIB, SPD. Then it will be released for public comment (September). Todd asked for comments, suggestions. Ken has cleaned up Volume 1 in preparation for updating it.  
 
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Meetings have begun. The update will include PIB, SPD. Then it will be released for public comment (September). Todd asked for comments, suggestions. Ken has cleaned up Volume 1 in preparation for updating it.  
Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. A Google Group has been established. Distribute the updated TF for use in this cycle’s implementation for the Connectathon. John Rhoads will prepare the CP for the TF. '''TC to set the date for the TF public comment release.'''
+
Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. A Google Group has been established. Distribute the updated TF for use in this cycle’s implementation for the Connectathon. John Rhoads will prepare the CP for the TF. TC to set the date for the TF public comment release.'''John Rhoads suggested members review and comment on the TF. He suggested emailing Todd with copies to Ken and himself. '''
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 58: Line 58:
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.03.25
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.03.25
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Can consistency be achieved for bar coding across vendors, domains? Todd has been in contact with HIBCC. Bar Coding and RFID as point of care identification: Lab and PCC are interested. Ken and Todd will develop a survey for the IHE Cochairs. Steven Dain recommended broadening the scope to include bar coding of drugs as related to medical devices. For example, Canada is looking at medication bar codes that would be used by infusion pumps. Todd, Ken will ask IHE if IHE should get involved. '''Ken noted that there are many organizations involved in this area; the question is “what would IHE’s role be?” Paul noted that a single set of drug identifiers would be beneficial. Todd noted that the Pharmacy Domain may be the appropriate focus. '''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Can consistency be achieved for bar coding across vendors, domains? Todd has been in contact with HIBCC. Bar Coding and RFID as point of care identification: Lab and PCC are interested. Ken and Todd will develop a survey for the IHE Cochairs. Steven Dain recommended broadening the scope to include bar coding of drugs as related to medical devices. For example, Canada is looking at medication bar codes that would be used by infusion pumps. Todd, Ken will ask IHE if IHE should get involved. Ken noted that there are many organizations involved in this area; the question is “what would IHE’s role be?” Paul noted that a single set of drug identifiers would be beneficial. Todd noted that the Pharmacy Domain may be the appropriate focus. '''The Domain Coordination Committee suggested that PCD address the issue. This doesn’t appear to be a natural issue for the PCD. John suggested that this be in the DPI White Paper and taken to the IEEE. He requested members consider any sources that may bear upon this. Move date to mid-June. '''
 
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 66: Line 65:
 
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo
 
| '''<Owner>:'''  | John Garguilo
 
| '''<Participants>''' | Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.  
 
| '''<Participants>''' | Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.03.25
+
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.15
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. John Garguilo believes two of the three profiles are now complete and correct in the MWB. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete. John Garguilo has requested that companies post their profiles at: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Connectathons/Yr3-2009/Yr3-PreConnectathonTesting/ PCD Year 3 Pre-Connectathon Testing FTP Site]. '''John Garguilo will update the date.'''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. John Garguilo believes two of the three profiles are now complete and correct in the MWB. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete. John Garguilo has requested that companies post their profiles at: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Connectathons/Yr3-2009/Yr3-PreConnectathonTesting/ PCD Year 3 Pre-Connectathon Testing FTP Site]. John Garguilo will update the date.'''John Rhoadsrequested that this be addressed early in the cycle. Manny to request members post sample messages for past and future work and note any issues that need to be fixed. '''
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 85: Line 84:
 
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
 
| '''<Owner>:'''  |  
 
| '''<Participants>''' |  
 
| '''<Participants>''' |  
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.05.08
+
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | ACM: clarify coding of multiple aspects of an alarm; PIV: clarify coding. '''change title to Change Proposal Tutorial – will take place at F2F  '''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Provide a tutorial on filing Change Proposals. E.g., ACM: clarify coding of multiple aspects of an alarm; PIV: clarify coding. '''Manny to clarify description'''
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 96: Line 95:
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | '''Jan is on the relevant tiger team. Jan and several PCD members will participate in developing the response. Maria will generate the materials, Jan will get it to HITSP, Lisa will contact HITSP and USHIK (within AHRQ). '''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Jan is on the relevant tiger team. Jan and several PCD members will participate in developing the response. Maria will generate the materials, Jan will get it to HITSP, Lisa will contact HITSP and USHIK (within AHRQ). '''Device data is out of scope for this portion of their work at prioritizing their work consistent with the ARRA. The device effort will likely resume in mid-July.'''  
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 105: Line 104:
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | '''Is this something we need to address by issuing separate profiles? Manny to ask Steve about this issue. [Steve responded that this is up to the domain.] '''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Is this something we need to address by issuing separate profiles? Manny to ask Steve about this issue. Steve responded that this is up to the domain. '''John Rhoads will look at separating PIB and SPD as profiles rather than options, determining what that entails. PCD will then consider making the change. '''
 +
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 114: Line 114:
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | '''Obtain OID.'''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | '''Manny to follow up on obtaining and OID.'''
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 159: Line 159:
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | '''Is there another transaction for pushing an IDCO report? '''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | Is there another transaction for pushing an IDCO report? '''ICDO is looking for alternatives. The PCD TC ballot to release the supplement for public comment is open until Monday, June 1. '''
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 168: Line 168:
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.06.03
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
 
| '''<Status>''' |OPEN
| '''<Comments>:'''  | '''Ken will convene a WCM meeting (Wednesday, May 13) to draft the Supplement. John Rhoad, Monroe, Paul offered to review the document. Todd will set DPI meeting. '''
+
| '''<Comments>:'''  | John Rhoads, Monroe, Paul offered to review the WCM document. '''Cycle 4 Supplement Status - Anticipated release dates are: PIV - June 1; RTM - June 1; WCM - September 1.'''  
  
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 21:41, 20 May 2009

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

Regularly scheduled meeting of the PCD Technical Committee

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Weekly Tcons

Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York)

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

Please add your suggestions

1. Agenda Approval
2. Review Discussion Summary: May 20 meeting PCD TC 2009-05-20 Webex
3. Need to determine which version of HL7 2.x (2.6 preferred) will be used going forward.
4. Ballot to Release the IDCO Supplement for Public Comment (document is at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Profiles/IDCO/)
5. Action Item Review
6. Additional Business
7. Next Meeting

Discussion Summary or Minutes and Action Items from Previous Meetings

Updated with May 20 meeting

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
60 Update TF Todd, Ken John Rhoads 2009.05.08 OPEN Meetings have begun. The update will include PIB, SPD. Then it will be released for public comment (September). Todd asked for comments, suggestions. Ken has cleaned up Volume 1 in preparation for updating it.

Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. A Google Group has been established. Distribute the updated TF for use in this cycle’s implementation for the Connectathon. John Rhoads will prepare the CP for the TF. TC to set the date for the TF public comment release.John Rhoads suggested members review and comment on the TF. He suggested emailing Todd with copies to Ken and himself.

62 Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations; which domain is responsible? Todd Co-chairs 2009.03.25 OPEN Can consistency be achieved for bar coding across vendors, domains? Todd has been in contact with HIBCC. Bar Coding and RFID as point of care identification: Lab and PCC are interested. Ken and Todd will develop a survey for the IHE Cochairs. Steven Dain recommended broadening the scope to include bar coding of drugs as related to medical devices. For example, Canada is looking at medication bar codes that would be used by infusion pumps. Todd, Ken will ask IHE if IHE should get involved. Ken noted that there are many organizations involved in this area; the question is “what would IHE’s role be?” Paul noted that a single set of drug identifiers would be beneficial. Todd noted that the Pharmacy Domain may be the appropriate focus. The Domain Coordination Committee suggested that PCD address the issue. This doesn’t appear to be a natural issue for the PCD. John suggested that this be in the DPI White Paper and taken to the IEEE. He requested members consider any sources that may bear upon this. Move date to mid-June.
66 Prepare profiles for registration. John Garguilo Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders. 2009.07.15 OPEN PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. John Garguilo believes two of the three profiles are now complete and correct in the MWB. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete. John Garguilo has requested that companies post their profiles at: PCD Year 3 Pre-Connectathon Testing FTP Site. John Garguilo will update the date.John Rhoadsrequested that this be addressed early in the cycle. Manny to request members post sample messages for past and future work and note any issues that need to be fixed.
77 Preparing proposal to HL7 for Pharmacy WG (new name) Gary Meyer Jeff Rinda, Al Engelbert 2009.07.01 OPEN Jeff noted this is not a critical issue, but the pharmacy group needs to address the issue. Todd will check with Gary Meyer. Change title to preparing proposal to HL7 for Pharmacy WG. They may not be interested in addressing this in this cycle (Atlanta the week of Sept. 21).

79 Change Proposal Tutorial 2009.06.03 OPEN Provide a tutorial on filing Change Proposals. E.g., ACM: clarify coding of multiple aspects of an alarm; PIV: clarify coding. Manny to clarify description
80 Monitor HITSP’s Work (also on PC list) Jan Wittenber Maria, Lisa Carnahan 2009.06.03 OPEN Jan is on the relevant tiger team. Jan and several PCD members will participate in developing the response. Maria will generate the materials, Jan will get it to HITSP, Lisa will contact HITSP and USHIK (within AHRQ). Device data is out of scope for this portion of their work at prioritizing their work consistent with the ARRA. The device effort will likely resume in mid-July.
81 Profile Optionality (should optional items be separate profiles?) John Rhoads 2009.06.03 OPEN Is this something we need to address by issuing separate profiles? Manny to ask Steve about this issue. Steve responded that this is up to the domain. John Rhoads will look at separating PIB and SPD as profiles rather than options, determining what that entails. PCD will then consider making the change.


82 OID for PCD Todd, John Garguilo 2009.06.03 OPEN Manny to follow up on obtaining and OID.
83 MOUs Sandy 2009.06.03 OPEN Follow up MOU status with CIMIT, ASTM. It is on the ASTM executive meeting agenda next week.
84 Patient Identity and PCD Messages Todd, Khalid, Gary 2009.06.03 OPEN How best to accomplish this tie will be addressed in the white paper for further development as a supplement to PIB (Todd). Coordination with IEEE (-20103 CCOM) and ICE-PAC will be accomplished Jan. Draft a patient association brief profile proposal (Khalid). The A04 registration message is not the commonly used message, while A01 is used by hospitals at admission (Gary). Gary will review this issue and it will be factored into the CPs for publication and testing in the 2010 Connectathon.
85 NIST Tools for RTM Rob Snellick John Garguilo, Paul, Todd 2009.06.03 OPEN Engage and initiate discussions with Open Health Tools (OHT) to explore coordination - NIST, and PCD – John Garguilo and Rob Snellick. RTM Tool Usage Policy Team: Form a team to manage the introduction and release of the tool, including exploring the means to publicize the availability of the test tools and RTM project – Todd, Paul, John Garguilo
86 Test Tools Rob Snellick Manny 2009.06.03 OPEN NIST will explore a registry for MWB files (Rob). Manny to request PCD Connectathon WG to post MWB files.
87 IDCO Nick 2009.06.03 OPEN Is there another transaction for pushing an IDCO report? ICDO is looking for alternatives. The PCD TC ballot to release the supplement for public comment is open until Monday, June 1.
88 Cycle 4 Supplement Status Ken, Todd 2009.06.03 OPEN John Rhoads, Monroe, Paul offered to review the WCM document. Cycle 4 Supplement Status - Anticipated release dates are: PIV - June 1; RTM - June 1; WCM - September 1.
89 2009.06.03 OPEN
90 2009.06.03 OPEN
91 2009.06.03 OPEN


Participants

placeholder

Chair: Todd Cooper (Breakthrough Solutions), John Rhoads (Philips)
<TBD>

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Agenda approved PLACEHOLDER

Action(s):

2 Issues with Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • Discussion Summary of previous TC meeting PLACEHOLDER yielded no changes

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 PCD Profiles Considered for Supplement and White Paper Development
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 XXXX
- Todd
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

5 Action Items
- Chairs
Status/Discussion:
  • 60: Update TF -
  • 62: Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations -
  • 66: Prepare profiles for registration -
  • 73: Take the MSH-7 PAM issue to HL7 -
  • 75: Review IHE.net TF page for accuracy re PCD entries -
  • 76: RTM tests for the upcoming Connectathon, add the test to Kudu -
  • 77: Ask HL7 to address gaps in v3 that affect PCD's ability to develop extensions to PIV -
  • 79: Change Proposals -

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

6 Announcements
- All
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

7 PCD F2F Meeting
- Todd
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Next Meeting

The next TC meeting will be June 17 PCD TC 2009-06-17 Webex

PCD Home