PCD Pump 2011-11-02 WebEx

(Infusion Pump Main Page)

Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Infusion Pump Working Group discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD Infusion Pump WG

Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Time: 14:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)

Duration: 60 Minutes'

Note: Specific web & phone information will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

1. Review today's Agenda

2. Review Initial Device Specialization - Infusion Pump Content Profile Detailed Proposal

3. Discuss Harmonization of ACM and IPEC Content (per 2011.10 F2F discussion)

4. Open Discussion

5. Next Meeting Schedule & Agenda

Attachments / Materials

• <add attachments links here>

Discussion Notes

Chair/Host: Jeff Rinda (Hospira)

Participants: George Bertos (Baxter), Todd Cooper (BSF), Al Engelbert (ProtoLink), Jack Hoffman (B.Braun), John Rhoads (Philips), Erin Sparnon (ECRI), Khalid Zubaidi (CareFusion)

NOTE: Action Item Review updates have been posted directly to the Infusion Pump Action Items wiki page

Item	Topic	Discussion
1	Introductions & Agenda Review - Chair	Status/Discussion: Didn't quite get the Agenda reviewed and approved ... Decisions/Issues: Action(s):
2	Detailed Proposal Review - Todd	Status/Discussion: Since the F2F in Kansas City (2011.10), Todd has started to create an DS-IP (Device Specialization - Infusion Pump) Detailed Work Item proposal based on: Brief Profile Proposal contents Discussions at the 2011.10 PCD F2F Discussion focused on the first issue identified in that draft DS-IP document: Title: Device Specialization - Infusion Pump Content Profile Questions focused on ... Is this a pure content value set specification or is it a profile? Profile implies definition of Actors, Transactions, and (optionally) Semantic Content If it is a content profile, do we need to define some "dummy" actors to be able to call out the content or leverage existing actors? What is done elsewhere in IHE technical frameworks (e.g., ITI and PCC)? Is one approach more efficient than the other? (i.e., easier to develop) Is one approach more extensible to other device modalities and profile usages than the other? What becomes a profile vs. an option? (not a black & white line) Etc. Etc. Etc. Decisions/Issues: Formalize the work item objectives and options more clearly and validate with IHE experts (esp. Moore and Garguilo) Action(s): Published initial draft of the DS-IP detailed proposal working document (Todd) Draft slide deck capturing DS-IP for presentation at next meeting (Todd) Review slides with Steve Moore before next meeting (Todd) Review slides with John Garguilo / NIST before next meeting (Todd)
3	... - TBD	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
4	... - TBD	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Action(s):
5	Next Meeting - Chair	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: The group decided that the next meeting will be Wednesday 2011.11.09. Topics will begin with a review of the DP-IP Detailed Proposal Slide Deck Action(s):

Next Meeting

NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 14:00 (Eastern) on 2011.11.09 (60 minutes)

(Reviewed & approved by PCD Infusion Pump WG on 2011.11.09

PCD Home