Difference between revisions of "PCD PC 2008-12-17 Webex"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Establish page)
 
m (→‎Next Meeting: archive)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
== Proposed Agenda ==  
 
== Proposed Agenda ==  
  
''Preliminary - Placeholder''
 
  
:1 Review of Discussion Summary of F2F, Joint PC/TC November 5
+
:1 Review of Discussion Summaries [[PCD PC 2008-11-19 Webex]], [[PCD PC&TC 2008-12-03 Webex]] 
 
:2 PCD Governance Wiki
 
:2 PCD Governance Wiki
:3 Update on Brief Profile Proposals:
+
:3 Vote to continue work on Profile Extensions and Profile Proposals:
 +
::* DEC and options
 
::* ACM Open Issues / Extensions
 
::* ACM Open Issues / Extensions
::* PIV Open Issues / Extensions
+
::* PIV Open Issues / Extensions - will proceed, no vote required
::* RTM Open Issues / Extensions
+
::* RTM Open Issues / Extensions - will proceed, no vote required
::* DPI Profile Update
+
::* DPI Profile Update (3 components, -DnA, DR and SYM)
 
::* WCM Profile Update  
 
::* WCM Profile Update  
 
::* QBD Profile Update
 
::* QBD Profile Update
:4 White Paper Proposals
+
:4 Vote to continue work on White Paper Proposals
 
::* DPI
 
::* DPI
 +
::* MEM
 
::* Medical Device Semantic Architecture
 
::* Medical Device Semantic Architecture
 
::* Regulatory Considerations
 
::* Regulatory Considerations
:5 Showcase Planning
+
:5 Survey of Cycle Priorities and Participation
 +
:6 Showcase Planning
 
::* Companies and systems participating  
 
::* Companies and systems participating  
 
::* Scenario
 
::* Scenario
Line 36: Line 38:
 
::* Network and utility requirements
 
::* Network and utility requirements
 
::* New Directions
 
::* New Directions
:6 IHE International
+
:7 Review votes and preferences that were balloted
 +
::* PC vote on proceeding on profiles, preferences and priorities
 +
::* TC for information only: PIV CP, 100 uV unit of measure for STD deviation
 +
:8 IHE International
 
::* IEEE-IHE MoU Update
 
::* IEEE-IHE MoU Update
:7 Continua
+
:9 Continua
:8 Review Schedule for remainder of 2008
+
:10 Review Schedule for remainder of 2008
:9 Review Action Items
+
:11 Review Action Items
:9 New Business
+
:12 New Business
  
 
== Discussion Summary and Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
 
== Discussion Summary and Action Items from Previous Meetings ==
  
'''Placeholder'''
+
Discussion Summaries from previous meetings are not reviewed unless a significant issue is raised. Decision meetings will have minutes that require approval. This may be accomplished on email ballot.
 
 
Discussion Summaries from previous meetings for review:
 
:: Oct. 21-23: [[PCD PC&TC 2008-10-21 to 23 F2F]]
 
:: Nov. 5: [[PCD PC&TC 2008-11-05 Webex]]
 
 
 
Action Items from the previous meetings, including the F2F:
 
  
 +
Action Items from the previous meetings: [[PCD PC 2008-11-19 Webex]], [[PCD PC&TC 2008-12-03 Webex]]
 
:{|border="2"  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 76: Line 76:
 
| Todd Cooper
 
| Todd Cooper
 
| --
 
| --
| October 1, 2008
+
| December 17, 2008
 
| Open
 
| Open
 
| Elliot arranged for Didi to forward the current HL7 draft to IEEE for review as a template. That one is complete and signatures added. This MOU addresses intellectual property exchanges. Change date to Oct. 1.
 
| Elliot arranged for Didi to forward the current HL7 draft to IEEE for review as a template. That one is complete and signatures added. This MOU addresses intellectual property exchanges. Change date to Oct. 1.
  
|-
 
| align="center" | 66
 
| Analysis of Survey Results
 
| Ray
 
| --
 
| October 21, 2008
 
| Open
 
| --
 
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 69
 
| Recruit Champions for development of Profiles, e.g., document transfer
 
| Ken
 
| --
 
| October 1, 2008
 
| Open
 
| Various new profiles (DPI, WCM) as well as extensions to current profiles were discussed during the Webex.  Also the "black box" profile was brought up as a possible effort and Ken said he would look to see if we already had something in our files originally submitted by J. Harrington.
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 112: Line 95:
 
| Ken, Manny
 
| Ken, Manny
 
| --
 
| --
| None
+
| Open
 
| Open
 
| Open
 
| A few replies were recieved from Ken's email indicating nurses would not be able to participate in PC. Todd indicated that RTM ventilator WG has successfully recruited physicians. Profile development may be a reasonable initial focus for involvement and perhaps lead to further involvement in PCD. Paul had earlier suggested a booth at at ACC, other meetings. Liase with standards groups such as ASTM, professional societies.
 
| A few replies were recieved from Ken's email indicating nurses would not be able to participate in PC. Todd indicated that RTM ventilator WG has successfully recruited physicians. Profile development may be a reasonable initial focus for involvement and perhaps lead to further involvement in PCD. Paul had earlier suggested a booth at at ACC, other meetings. Liase with standards groups such as ASTM, professional societies.
Line 130: Line 113:
 
| Todd
 
| Todd
 
| Peter Hendler
 
| Peter Hendler
| October 22, 2008
+
| December 3, 2008
 
| Open
 
| Open
 
| Todd: VA was planning to move forward about use of CDA. He will talk with James McCain. Peter: Kaiser and VA working to trade documents as part of NHIN project.  
 
| Todd: VA was planning to move forward about use of CDA. He will talk with James McCain. Peter: Kaiser and VA working to trade documents as part of NHIN project.  
Line 145: Line 128:
 
| October 8, 2008
 
| October 8, 2008
 
| Open
 
| Open
| Rob Snellick is working on this. Peter Rontey identified two open issues. One suggests that PCD may need to select HL7 v.2.6 as baseline. The other relates to OBX.5 which has an indeterminate data type. Peter believes he has a solution if NIST Message Maker can accommodate his approach.  
+
| Rob Snellick is working on this. Peter Rontey identified two open issues. One suggests that PCD may need to select HL7 v.2.6 as baseline. The other relates to OBX.5 which has an indeterminate data type. Peter believes he has a solution if NIST Message Maker can accommodate his approach. John Garguilo suggested this be changed to two issues, one related to HL7 profiles and the other to develop and validate the profiles. Decision deferred.  
  
|-
+
With regard to test tools and validation the MWB will be used, and can be used in Pre-Connectathon testing. We need to identify what the vendors will communicate within the profiles and select the parameters that will be used. We then need to know what tables and other data is used and these must also be provided to NIST. Optimally, values and ranges will be defined. We need to define the profiles and parameters that will be used to validate RTM.
| align="center" | 77
+
| Develop PCD Cycle 4 Profile Proposals
+
This effort is a test of the NIST tools as well, the goal is to provide Cypress as a web tool available anytime desired.  
| Ray Zambuto, Ken Fuchs
 
| IHE PCD
 
| October 15, 2008
 
| Open
 
| Todd will update PCD_Profiles and related Wiki pages for use in the profile development process. Members will submit Brief Profile Proposals for consideration at the F2F.
 
Todd and Ken will determine whether ITI and possibly PCC have any interest in RTLS profiling.
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 165: Line 142:
 
| Open
 
| Open
 
| Ray will add a question or two regarding the need to support web services and other service oriented architectures.
 
| Ray will add a question or two regarding the need to support web services and other service oriented architectures.
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 79
 
| Transferred from PCD Cochairs: White papers, e.g., for DPI.
 
| Todd Cooper
 
| --
 
| October 21, 2008
 
| Open
 
| White Papers will be helpful in estabishing context for development of specialized profiles. For example, Device Semantic Architecture, Point-of-Care Integration.
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 190: Line 158:
 
| Todd
 
| Todd
 
| --
 
| --
| November 19, 2008
+
| December 3, 2008
 
| Open
 
| Open
 
| ISO TR283800 Part 2 has been approved. These work items were submitted to ISO TC215 per IHE International's Liaison agreement, and standardize both the IHE process as well as the technical frameworks that have been developed. A document that includes descriptions and pointers to all the different IHE profiles are required. As a result of this, each domain needs to make sure that the referenced material is complete and consistent. The following must be correct and up to date (from Charles Parisot):  
 
| ISO TR283800 Part 2 has been approved. These work items were submitted to ISO TC215 per IHE International's Liaison agreement, and standardize both the IHE process as well as the technical frameworks that have been developed. A document that includes descriptions and pointers to all the different IHE profiles are required. As a result of this, each domain needs to make sure that the referenced material is complete and consistent. The following must be correct and up to date (from Charles Parisot):  
Line 214: Line 182:
 
| December 3, 2008
 
| December 3, 2008
 
| Open
 
| Open
| Follow up with Didi, Lisa regarding PCD recruiting during Connectathon.  
+
| Recruiting presentation during the Connectathon has not received support from Didi. We may want to consider a webinar.  
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 247: Line 215:
 
| Review the IHE.net/pcd page
 
| Review the IHE.net/pcd page
 
| Todd
 
| Todd
| --
+
| John Rhoads
| November 7, 2008
+
| January 29, 2009
 
| Open
 
| Open
 
| --
 
| --
Line 256: Line 224:
 
| Consider how to move non-IHE members to membership
 
| Consider how to move non-IHE members to membership
 
| Ken
 
| Ken
| --
+
| John Rhoads
| --
+
| January 29, 2009
 
| Open
 
| Open
 
| --
 
| --
Line 313: Line 281:
 
== Participants ==
 
== Participants ==
  
:'''Chair:''' Ken Fuchs
+
'''Chair:''' Ray Zambuto
  
:* Alex Beechie, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, Colin FX Gartska, Steve Merritt, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Paul Schluter, Jan Wittenber, Scott Zaffrin, Ray Zambuto, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst
+
Ruth Berge, Jon Blasingame, Anupriyo Chakravarti, Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, Christof Gessner, Chad Hays, John Hotchkiss, Roy Kerns, Steve Merritt, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jan Wittenbar, Ray Zambuto, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst
  
 
== Discussion ==
 
== Discussion ==
Line 328: Line 296:
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* Accepted
+
:* Steve Merritt as the incoming cochair led much of the meeting.
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 2
 
| align="center" | 2
| '''Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
+
| '''Discussion Summary''' <br>- Ray
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* The PCD is developing a Governance Document building upon the IHE's, and using ITI's as a guideline.
+
:* Significant issues, if any: none raised
:* Meetings fall into two categories: Discussion and Decision Meetings. Only Decision Meetings will require a vote on minutes, and this can be accomplished by email. Discussion Meeting documentation will be called Discussion Summaries. Corrections, additions, can be made on the Wiki pages.
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
:* Previous meetings, including the PC portion of the F2F were not Decision Meetings. No vote on those meeting summaries is conducted.
 
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
Line 344: Line 309:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 3
 
| align="center" | 3
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair
+
| '''Action Items''' <br>- Steve
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* #44: IEEE MOU, above change date to Dec. 17
+
:* 41: change date to Jan. 14
:* #66: Survey results, there is a request to present them to the coordination group of the CE-IT Community. Close.
+
:* 44: change date to Feb. 11. Cardiology Domain received funding. Paul noted that the pacemaker group will work within the cardiology domain, and RTM will include terms for pacemaker communications.
:* #69: Depending upon outcome of votes on profiles additional recruitment may be necessary. Close.
+
:* 70: no change
:* #70: Cardiology Domain: no change
+
:* 71: Manny will talk with Cristal Anderson, HIMSS. There's a potential for recruiting related to the Connectathon. If anyone wants to invite a company to observe at Connectathon let Manny know.
:* #71, 72: set open or none as standard
+
:* User Guide - should have draft Feb. 1.
:* #74: no change; consider moving to TC, change date to Dec. 3
 
:* #76: Test Tooling: change to two issues, one related to HL7 profiles and the other to develop and validate the profiles. With regard to test tools and validation the MWB will be used, and can be used in Pre-Connectathon testing. We need to identify what the vendors will communicate within the profiles and select the parameters that will be used. We then need to know what tables and other data is used and these must also be provided to NIST. Optimally, values and ranges will be defined. We need to define the profiles and parameters that will be used to validate RTM.
 
:: This effort is a test of sorts for the NIST tools, the goal is to provide Cypress as a web tool available anytime desired.
 
:* #77: RTLS profile will be addressed in MEM; close
 
:* #78: No change
 
:* #79: Close; redundant
 
:* #80: No change
 
:* #81: Change date to Dec 3
 
:* #82: No change
 
:* #83: Recruiting presentation during the Connectathon has not received support from Didi. We may want to consider a webinar.
 
:* #84: No change
 
:* #85: No change
 
:* #86: No change
 
:* #87, 88: add John Rhoads, change date to jan. 21
 
  
  
Line 373: Line 324:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 4
 
| align="center" | 4
| '''Announcements''' <br>- Chair
+
| '''Announcements''' <br>- Steve
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
Announcements:  
 
Announcements:  
:* Cochairs elections are over, Steve Merritt and John Rhoads have been elected to the PC, TC respectively.
+
:* Continua – we have agreement on the RTM format for terms. Rick Cnossen is setting up a meeting to discuss the gateway encoding from remote site to the caregiver. Paul reminded participants of the PCD’s desire to have a single protocol that can accommodate more complex devices.
:* IEEE MOU is close to resolution
+
 
:* Continua: It is possible that HITSP will not make a decision of the two options this year, and may not decide to have a single solution. ITE group within HITSP will hold one more meeting. Elliot (representing IHE) and Todd (representing IEEE) were reelected to the IHE Board and Rick Cnossen will represent Continua.
+
:* Paul will develop and distribute an updated RTM table over the holidays with input from Maria at NIST, Bikram with beds. Christof expressed interest in this project. Paul noted that there are other tables, such as a German table for biochemistry. Christof suggested discussion at the HL7 meeting.
 +
 
 +
:* Add Showcase demo policy and IHE Australia to the agenda for Jan. 14
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 386: Line 339:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 5
 
| align="center" | 5
| '''PCD Governance''' <br>- Ken
+
| '''Governance Document''' <br>- Ray
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* Ken lead discussion of the PCD Governance Wiki page under development. It is based upon the ITI document, but with changes.  
+
:* Reviewed the Governance Document and extended kudos to Ken for job well done in developing a comprehensive and concise document. We are waiting for review by Didi and/or Lisa.  
:: Ken requested review.
+
 
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 +
:* Manny to call Didi.
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 6
 
| align="center" | 6
| '''Updates on Brief Profile Proposals''' <br>- Ken
+
| '''Vote to Continue Work on Profile Proposals''' <br>- Manny
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* Waiting for DPI proposals to send out for vote.
+
:* Manny provided an update on votes received as well as results of the surveys.
:* Ken asked how we will resolve the availability of resources to work on these.
+
:* The vote extended to end of day.
:* MEM was not on the list.
 
:* PCC may have a profile for query of a database that requires consideration in developing QBD.
 
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 +
:* Manny to summarize the results, then post to ftp site.
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 7
 
| align="center" | 7
| '''Showcase Update''' <br>- Manny
+
| '''Connectathon and Showcase Updates''' <br>- Manny
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* Physical layout, utility requirements are requested this week.
+
:* Manny displayed the spreadsheet showing participating systems and their sequence in the demonstration.  
:* Manny to layout the structure with devices, systems.
+
:* Tests have not been finalized and loaded into Kudu.  
:* Wireless control of the convention floor will not be managed by HIMSS; we will work with their contractor
+
:* Showcase: Question of how we will link with Continua remains open.
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 8
 
| align="center" | 8
| '''Meetings Schedule''' <br>- Ken
+
| '''100 uV ST Segment Deviation Vote''' <br>- Paul
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:* No meeting next week
+
:* Paul summarized the issue regarding the 100 uV vote – customers may wish to keep the 100 uV display and GE will accommodate them as necessary and will monitor the situation. However, this is not a scientifically supported value by IEEE.
:* Joint PC/TC Dec. 3
 
:* Dec. 10 TC
 
:* Dec. 17 PC
 
:* No meeting Dec. 24
 
:* To be resolved: Joint meeting, any meeting on Dec. 31?
 
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 439: Line 386:
 
== Next Meeting ==
 
== Next Meeting ==
  
The next meeting will be _________________________
+
The next meeting will be January 14, 2009: [[PCD PC 2009-01-14 Webex]]
  
''<Add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">''
+
''<For Decision Meetings add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">''
  
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
+
[[Category: PCD Meeting Archive]]

Latest revision as of 22:47, 26 May 2009

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

Regularly scheduled meeting of the PCD Planning Committee

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Committee Tcons

Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York )

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

1 Review of Discussion Summaries PCD PC 2008-11-19 Webex, PCD PC&TC 2008-12-03 Webex
2 PCD Governance Wiki
3 Vote to continue work on Profile Extensions and Profile Proposals:
  • DEC and options
  • ACM Open Issues / Extensions
  • PIV Open Issues / Extensions - will proceed, no vote required
  • RTM Open Issues / Extensions - will proceed, no vote required
  • DPI Profile Update (3 components, -DnA, DR and SYM)
  • WCM Profile Update
  • QBD Profile Update
4 Vote to continue work on White Paper Proposals
  • DPI
  • MEM
  • Medical Device Semantic Architecture
  • Regulatory Considerations
5 Survey of Cycle Priorities and Participation
6 Showcase Planning
  • Companies and systems participating
  • Scenario
  • Physical layout
  • Network and utility requirements
  • New Directions
7 Review votes and preferences that were balloted
  • PC vote on proceeding on profiles, preferences and priorities
  • TC for information only: PIV CP, 100 uV unit of measure for STD deviation
8 IHE International
  • IEEE-IHE MoU Update
9 Continua
10 Review Schedule for remainder of 2008
11 Review Action Items
12 New Business

Discussion Summary and Action Items from Previous Meetings

Discussion Summaries from previous meetings are not reviewed unless a significant issue is raised. Decision meetings will have minutes that require approval. This may be accomplished on email ballot.

Action Items from the previous meetings: PCD PC 2008-11-19 Webex, PCD PC&TC 2008-12-03 Webex

No. Action Item Owner Participants Due Open/Closed Description/Update
41 Monitor FDA actions on Universal Device ID Jeff Secunda -- January 1, 2009 Open Jeff Secunda said that the FDA will be starting a project on the UID concept. The project will take at least 1 year.
44 Define relationship between IEEE standards and IHE profiles; the role of the PCD in determining this relationship. MOU – reviewed and published for consideration at this Friday’s IEEE Board meeting. The HL7/IEEE MOU is also in process Todd Cooper -- December 17, 2008 Open Elliot arranged for Didi to forward the current HL7 draft to IEEE for review as a template. That one is complete and signatures added. This MOU addresses intellectual property exchanges. Change date to Oct. 1.


70 Coordinate 12 lead ECG effort with Cardiology domain. Cardiology Domain – will become active again. Ray -- January 2, 2009 Open Depends upon Cardiology Domain's success in finding sponsors. Defer until Cardiology Domain has updated its workplan and additional action is required.
71 Recruit clinicians; develop novel ways, attend to their priorities and schedules Ken, Manny -- Open Open A few replies were recieved from Ken's email indicating nurses would not be able to participate in PC. Todd indicated that RTM ventilator WG has successfully recruited physicians. Profile development may be a reasonable initial focus for involvement and perhaps lead to further involvement in PCD. Paul had earlier suggested a booth at at ACC, other meetings. Liase with standards groups such as ASTM, professional societies.
72 Press releases as recruiting tool, including the Showcase. PCD will invite companies to observe Connectathon and reach out to companies and users to invite them to the PCD demo at the Showcase. Manny -- Open Open Two press releases have been prepared and distributed to various organizations for distribution.
74 Mapping PCD into v3 CDA with relevance to RTM Todd Peter Hendler December 3, 2008 Open Todd: VA was planning to move forward about use of CDA. He will talk with James McCain. Peter: Kaiser and VA working to trade documents as part of NHIN project.
Goal is to assure the appropriate set of medical device semantic components is included in the appropriate location in CDA/CCD documents and HL7 v3 nessages.
Todd will ask the VA as to whether there is still any interest in this project.
Todd will schedule a webex the end of August/early September to discuss the status of the profile proposal and identify what needs to happen to move it forward in this next cycle.
Will be addressed in Vancouver meeting the week of September 15.
76 Test Tooling, NIST and MWB John Garguilo Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, John Rhoads, Peter Rontey, Paul Schluter October 8, 2008 Open Rob Snellick is working on this. Peter Rontey identified two open issues. One suggests that PCD may need to select HL7 v.2.6 as baseline. The other relates to OBX.5 which has an indeterminate data type. Peter believes he has a solution if NIST Message Maker can accommodate his approach. John Garguilo suggested this be changed to two issues, one related to HL7 profiles and the other to develop and validate the profiles. Decision deferred.

With regard to test tools and validation the MWB will be used, and can be used in Pre-Connectathon testing. We need to identify what the vendors will communicate within the profiles and select the parameters that will be used. We then need to know what tables and other data is used and these must also be provided to NIST. Optimally, values and ranges will be defined. We need to define the profiles and parameters that will be used to validate RTM.

This effort is a test of the NIST tools as well, the goal is to provide Cypress as a web tool available anytime desired.

78 2009 Survey Development Ray Zambuto -- January 1, 2009 Open Ray will add a question or two regarding the need to support web services and other service oriented architectures.
80 Recruiting Members -- January 1, 2009 Open Invite new companies to observe PCD at this year’s Connectathon. Manny to compile list as suggestions are received.


81 ISO 215 Requirements for Posting Profile Details - transferred from TC Todd -- December 3, 2008 Open ISO TR283800 Part 2 has been approved. These work items were submitted to ISO TC215 per IHE International's Liaison agreement, and standardize both the IHE process as well as the technical frameworks that have been developed. A document that includes descriptions and pointers to all the different IHE profiles are required. As a result of this, each domain needs to make sure that the referenced material is complete and consistent. The following must be correct and up to date (from Charles Parisot):
  • The overall listing of IHE profiles (TI and TF) at: http://www.ihe.net/Profiles.
  • The overall listing of IHE profiles (TI and TF) at: http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Profiles. Each detailed Profile Description page referenced must be accurate.
  • The overall listing of profiles included under IHE Domains at: http://www.ihe.net/Domains/index.cfm. Verify that each detailed Profile Description page referenced must be available from the Wiki (see above).
  • Each Domain name must have a link to the decription of the domain and its scope. NOTE: THOSE descriptions are really weak and inconsistent. Todd will produce a one page (max) description of the Domain and more importantly of its scope for the ISO TR28380. This will be the place where the IHE.net web site will be referenced with specific profile decriptions.
82 Users Guide Steve Merritt -- January 1, 2009? Open --
83 Recruiting in Chicago area in advance of Showcase Manny -- December 3, 2008 Open Recruiting presentation during the Connectathon has not received support from Didi. We may want to consider a webinar.
84 Vote on Brief Profile Proposals Todd -- -- Open Provide Wiki pages and prepare ballot.
85 MEM detailed proposal Steve Merritt -- January 1, 2009 Open --
86 Contribute to, or develop a glossary. -- -- -- Open --
87 Review the IHE.net/pcd page Todd John Rhoads January 29, 2009 Open --
88 Consider how to move non-IHE members to membership Ken John Rhoads January 29, 2009 Open --
89 Open
90 Open
91 Open
92 Open
93 Open


Participants

Chair: Ray Zambuto

Ruth Berge, Jon Blasingame, Anupriyo Chakravarti, Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, Christof Gessner, Chad Hays, John Hotchkiss, Roy Kerns, Steve Merritt, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Jan Wittenbar, Ray Zambuto, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Steve Merritt as the incoming cochair led much of the meeting.

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary
- Ray
Status/Discussion:
  • Significant issues, if any: none raised

Action(s):

3 Action Items
- Steve
Status/Discussion:
  • 41: change date to Jan. 14
  • 44: change date to Feb. 11. Cardiology Domain received funding. Paul noted that the pacemaker group will work within the cardiology domain, and RTM will include terms for pacemaker communications.
  • 70: no change
  • 71: Manny will talk with Cristal Anderson, HIMSS. There's a potential for recruiting related to the Connectathon. If anyone wants to invite a company to observe at Connectathon let Manny know.
  • User Guide - should have draft Feb. 1.


Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 Announcements
- Steve
Status/Discussion:

Announcements:

  • Continua – we have agreement on the RTM format for terms. Rick Cnossen is setting up a meeting to discuss the gateway encoding from remote site to the caregiver. Paul reminded participants of the PCD’s desire to have a single protocol that can accommodate more complex devices.
  • Paul will develop and distribute an updated RTM table over the holidays with input from Maria at NIST, Bikram with beds. Christof expressed interest in this project. Paul noted that there are other tables, such as a German table for biochemistry. Christof suggested discussion at the HL7 meeting.
  • Add Showcase demo policy and IHE Australia to the agenda for Jan. 14

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

5 Governance Document
- Ray
Status/Discussion:
  • Reviewed the Governance Document and extended kudos to Ken for job well done in developing a comprehensive and concise document. We are waiting for review by Didi and/or Lisa.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • Manny to call Didi.
6 Vote to Continue Work on Profile Proposals
- Manny
Status/Discussion:
  • Manny provided an update on votes received as well as results of the surveys.
  • The vote extended to end of day.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • Manny to summarize the results, then post to ftp site.
7 Connectathon and Showcase Updates
- Manny
Status/Discussion:
  • Manny displayed the spreadsheet showing participating systems and their sequence in the demonstration.
  • Tests have not been finalized and loaded into Kudu.
  • Showcase: Question of how we will link with Continua remains open.

Decisions/Issues: Action(s):

8 100 uV ST Segment Deviation Vote
- Paul
Status/Discussion:
  • Paul summarized the issue regarding the 100 uV vote – customers may wish to keep the 100 uV display and GE will accommodate them as necessary and will monitor the situation. However, this is not a scientifically supported value by IEEE.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Next Meeting

The next meeting will be January 14, 2009: PCD PC 2009-01-14 Webex

<For Decision Meetings add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">

PCD Home