PCD PC&TC 2011-01-05 Webex

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

PC and TC Special Decision Meeting

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Planning and Technical Committees Joint Meeting

Regularly Scheduled Meeting Time

Date: Wednesday, January 5, 2011 Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York)

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

1. Agenda Approval

2. Review Discussion Summaries: Planning Committee December 15 PCD PC 2010-12-15 Webex and Technical Committee December 22 PCD TC 2010-12-22 Webex

The Focus of This Meeting is Determination of Cycle 6 Efforts

3. Consensus by the TC: Evaluation of Detailed Proposals and Recommendations of Feasibility to the PC was accomplished by a show of hands.

1. Asynchronous Data Query - Discussed in TC Meeting Dec. 8 PCD TC 2010-12-08 Webex
2. Really Consistent Time (WP) - Discussed in TC Meeting Dec. 8 PCD TC 2010-12-08 Webex
3. Point of Care Identity Management Discussed in TC Meeting Dec. 22 PCD TC 2010-12-22 Webex
4. MEM Location Tracking Discuss in TC Meeging Dec. 22 PCD TC 2010-12-22 Webex

4. Decisions by the PC to Select WorkItems for Cycle 6; Decision Meeting, notice provided earlier

1. Formal Decision (if quorum is met) record your vote at http://doodle.com/a5b6rf7m2uhy7a2h
2. Email Ballot Follow Up (if quorum is not met in the ballot)

5. Next Meetings

1. Next PC, TC meetings
2. Other Meetings of Interest

6. Additional Business

References

Point-of-Care Identification Management

(Brief Proposal from 2009)

(Detailed Profile Proposal from 2010.12)

Asynchronous Data Query (Discussed in last meeting)

Asynchronous Data Query Brief Proposal

Asynchronous Data Query Detailed Proposal

MEM RTLS

Location Tracking Service Detailed Proposal

RTLS Presentation 2010-10-01

RTLS Presentation to ITI

Brief proposal

"Really Consistent Time" (Discussed in last meeting)

Brief proposal

Action Items from Previous Meetings

See PCD Technical Committee Action Items.

Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Participants

Placeholder

Chair: Steve Merritt

Christel Anderson, Jon Blasingame, Bikram Day, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, Sarah Hopkins, Roy Kerns,Steve Merritt, John Rhoads, Jeff Rinda, Paul Schluter, Erin Sparnon, Greg Staudenmaier, Scott Zaffrin, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst

Discussion

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Item	Topic	Discussion
1	Introductions & Agenda Review - Chair	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Previous meetings notes accepted (PC, TC) with these changes: - John and Todd called attention to the new name: Point of Care Identity Management (PCIM). Manny will update the TC minutes and today’s agenda. Todd will review Wiki pages to update them as well. - Change bullet four to Observation Report. Action(s):
2	Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes - Chair	Status/Discussion: Discussion Summary of previous meetings of the PC, TC were accepted Decisions/Issues: Action(s):
3	Agenda Items - As Noted	Status/Discussion: Previous meetings notes accepted (PC, TC) with these changes: - John and Todd called attention to the new name: Point of Care Identity Management (PCIM). Manny will update the TC minutes and today’s agenda. Todd will review Wiki pages to update them as well. - Change bullet four to Observation Report. The primary focus of the meeting is selection of work items for cycle 6. Manny and John Rhoads described the process: a consensus of the TC about feasibility followed by a vote by the PC. Todd described the technical aspects and risks associated with the Point of Care Identity Management (PCIM) profile. He noted that this profile will be developed in phases and suggested two phases. He will post the final version. The TC was polled on each of the profiles during the meeting. All passed and the numbers are: - Asynchronous Data Query: 1 abstention, 10 in favor, no objections - Really Consistent Time: 4 abstentions, 7 in favor, no objections - Point of Care Identity Management (PCIM): 2 abstentions, 11 in favor, no objections - Location Tracking: 3 abstentions, 10 in favor, no objections The PC began a formal ballot process using the Doodle survey and that will be followed by an email ballot containing the four proposals. Decisions/Issues: Action(s): Manny to follow up and learn how to use the voting panel.
7	Announcements - All	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Action(s):

Next Meeting

The next meetings are:

PC January __ PCD PC 2011-01-__ Webex and TC January __ PCD TC 2011-01-__ Webex

PCD Home