PCD PC&TC 2009-08-19 Webex

From IHE Wiki
Revision as of 08:36, 19 August 2009 by Efurst (talk | contribs) (→‎Proposed Agenda: add ballot updates)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

Joint meeting of the PCD Planning Committee

Replaces the regular PC meeting

WebEx Information

Topic: PCD Committee Tcons

Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Time: 11:00 am, Eastern Time (New York )

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

Please Add Your Suggestions

1. Review of Discussion Summaries PCD PC 2009-08-05 Webex and PCD TC 2009-08-12 Webex
2. PCD Issues (for details see below and Todd's email of August 12).
- Validation vs. Verification Testing
- One problem - multiple PCD TF solutions!
o ACM/DEC
- Profile Option Specification and Testing
- Keeping our House in Order
- Reduced Weight PAM for DEC
3. Update on White Papers and Supplements:
  • Ballots
o WAN PCD/Continua, IDCO, Pump passed
o RTM open
o MEM to come
  • ACM Open Issues / Extensions
  • DPI
  • Medical Equipment Management
  • PIV/Infusion Pump Open Issues / Extensions
  • RTM Open Issues / Extensions
  • IDCO
  • WCM
  • Medical Device Semantic Architecture
  • Regulatory Considerations
4. Continua
5. Connectathon/Showcase regular meetings
  • PCD Showcase Planning with HIMSS began yesterday
6. ARRA/Meaningful Use

Discussion Summary and Action Items from Previous Meetings

See PCD Planning Committee Action Items and PCD Technical Committee Action Items page.

Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Participants

Placeholder

Chair: Steve Merritt
  • Jon Blasingame, Anupriyo Chakravarti, Micha Coleman, Todd Cooper, Bikram Day, Walter Dobbins, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Jianguo Jiang, Steve Merritt, Gary Meyer, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, Paul Schluter, Tom Schultz, Nick Steblay, Khalid Zubaidi, Manny Furst

Discussion

Placeholder

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Accepted

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • Accepted as posted placeholder

Action(s):

3 Issues for Joint Meeting
- Chair
Status/Discussion - Issues for this joint meeting:
  • Validation vs. Verification Testing - or "yeah, we implemented the TF spec - but does it actually solve the problems identified in the profile's use cases?!" We are working on enhancing the V&V / conformance testing model that is used within PCD and to ensure that it is harmonized with what MDMs use in product development!
  • One problem - multiple PCD TF solutions! The most recent discussion of this is around the use of either PCD-01 or PCD-04 to communicate event data (e.g., transitions in an med admin protocol, such as switching from a secondary/piggyback to a primary source). We need to take a look at the clinical work flow that can involve numerous profiles and specify when one approach should be used over another. Also we need to determine how best to capture these specifications and test for conformance (perhaps a Volume IV?)
  • Profile Option Specification and Testing - this is a major issue with the existing Kudu tool that we must resolve as much as possible this year and hopefully even more next year. For example, saying you passed the DEC tests is not enough. Saying you passed the DEC-PIB is better. Saying DEC-PIB-PAM is even better. But then we sill have a "PAM profile" that we build to (IOW - not all of PAM is implemented). How does that work?! Also, there are some components that are too granular and may never be called out in formal option testing, but are very important to end users specifying and purchasing equipment. Perhaps we should consider "profile conformance statement templates" that could be provided say in the Users Guide.
  • Keeping our House in Order - The Technical Framework, under revision and "clean-up", is currently embodied in two volumes. We have always planned on 3 (with Volume III focusing on Semantic Content), and now possibly Volume IV for composite profile clinical work flow scenarios). There must be consistency across all the volumes, though, and minimized or eliminated duplication of information. And how do you relate semantic content (Volume III) with transactions & encodings (Volume II) with clinical scenarios (volume IV).

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 Profile and White Paper Updates
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • Updates
TF/DEC -
ACM -
DPI –
IDCO -
MEM -
PIV/Infusion Pump -
RTM -
WCM -
Semantic Architecture –
Regulatory Considerations -

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

5 Announcements
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • Connectathon and Showcase
  • F2F
  • User Handbook –
  • Australia
  • HIMSS Asia_Pac -
  • MOU with ICE –
  • HITSP
  • Continua

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


Next Meeting

The next meeting will be September 2, 2009: PCD PC 2009-09-02 Webex.

<For Decision Meetings add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">

PCD Home