Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2009-08-20 WebEx"

Latest revision as of 14:39, 17 May 2010

(DPI Profile Main Page) DPI White Paper Page

Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) White Paper development discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG

Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009

Time: 11:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)

Duration: 120 Minutes

Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

0. Review previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.08.06

1. DPI Profile in PCD Technical Framework Model Review

2. DPI White Paper Draft Review

3. ICE Appendix Review

4. HITSP Appendix Review

5. Planning / Next Session

Attachments / Materials

(No attachments for this meeting)

Discussion Notes

Participants

Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)

Participants: Jon Blasingame (Philips), John Garguilo (NIST), Kai Hassing (Philips), Gary Meyer (CareFusion), John Rhoads (Philips), Sandy Weininger (FDA/CDRH)

Discussion

Item	Topic	Discussion
1	Introductions & Agenda Review - Chair	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Agenda reviewed & modified to focus on the DPI WP discussion slide set. Action(s):
2	Approval of Discussion Notes - Chair	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Reviewed and approved 2009.08.06 Discussion Notes Action(s):
3	DPI WP Discussion Slide Set Review - Group	Status/Discussion: Initial review of the DPI WP Discussion Slide Set (6.5MB!) Note: Discussion comments added to slide set in "real-time" Question: What is the relationship between home health / Continua and the DPI efforts? (Garguilo) DPI materials have always included home health contexts (e.g., see Wittenber IHE Showcase '09 presentation, Slide #2) The primary IHE PCD and DPI focus is on professional / clinical health care vs. personal / home health. The DPI WP will reflect this focus. For example, the initial DPI profiles & roadmap will focus on clinical scenarios, while at the same time ensuring extension to home contexts as necessary and applicable. ICE Draft Review (Rhoads) - John provided a review of drafting work he has done on the "ICE" Appendix. - Main message should be: DPI supports ICE architectures, starting at the lowest connectivity levels - Audience may not have a clue about ICE, so the section should start with a brief overview & references - The Appendix should include: > ICE Overview / Backgrounder > ICE-PAC Overview, process review & sample analyses > Specific requirements for the IHE PCD TF, especially DPI profiles > Roadmap discussion, correlating with the main Roadmap section earlier in the document - Given the potential size of the ICE-related material, this section should provide only general information to achieve the main objective (stated above) and should defer more detailed treatment of the ICE-PAC material to a White Paper or other such document. The main purpose of this WP is DPI, not ICE - so balance in the amount of material should be maintained, while at the same time clearly pointing to the integration of the two efforts. - ICE will be mentioned earlier in the document, esp. in the clinical contexts section and the architectures discussion. Decisions/Issues: Action(s):
4	... - Group	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Action(s):
5	Next Meeting - Chair	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Next meeting: Thursday, 2009.08.27 Action(s):

Next Meeting

NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 2009.08.27 (120 minutes ... max!)

(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG <TBD>

PCD Home

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Topic: '''IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG'''
-Date: '''Thursday, July 23, 2009'''
+Date: '''Thursday, August 13, 2009'''
 Time: '''11:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)'''
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 == Proposed Agenda ==
-:0.  Review [[PCD_DPI_2009-07-09_WebEx | previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.07.09]]
+:0.  Review [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx | previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.08.06]]
-:1.  Wittenber:  Nurse PCA Blog Posting
+:1.  DPI Profile in PCD Technical Framework Model Review
-:2.  Review DPI Materials (e.g., from HIMSS)
+:2.  DPI White Paper Draft Review
-:3.  Status Update / Action Item Review
+:3.  ICE Appendix Review
-:4.  Planning / Next Session
+:4.  HITSP Appendix Review
+:5.  Planning / Next Session
 == Attachments / Materials ==
@@ Line 39: / Line 40: @@
 :'''Chair/Host:'''  Todd Cooper (BSF)
-:'''Participants:'''  ''<tbd>''
+:'''Participants:'''  Jon Blasingame (Philips), John Garguilo (NIST), Kai Hassing (Philips), Gary Meyer (CareFusion), John Rhoads (Philips), Sandy Weininger (FDA/CDRH)
 === Discussion ===
@@ Line 54: / Line 56: @@
 '''Decisions/Issues:'''
-:* Agenda ...
+:* Agenda reviewed & modified to focus on the DPI WP discussion slide set.
 '''Action(s):'''
@@ Line 63: / Line 65: @@
 '''Decisions/Issues:'''
-:* Reviewed and approved <page link>
+:* Reviewed and approved [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx#Discussion_Notes | 2009.08.06 Discussion Notes]]
 '''Action(s):'''
 |-
 | align="center" | 3
-| '''...''' <br>- Group
+| '''DPI WP Discussion Slide Set Review''' <br>- Group
 | '''Status/Discussion:'''
+:* Initial review of the [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Profiles/DPI/WP/PCD_DPI_WP_Discussion_r1.ppt DPI WP Discussion Slide Set (6.5MB!)]
+:::Note:  Discussion comments added to slide set in "real-time"
+:* Question:  What is the relationship between home health / Continua and the DPI efforts?  (Garguilo)
+::: DPI materials have always included home health contexts (e.g., [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Showcases/HIMSS2009April/Handouts/HIMSS09_IHE-PCD-DPI-DoorPoster-Handout-Ovw_v3d.pdf see Wittenber IHE Showcase '09 presentation, Slide #2])
+::: The primary IHE PCD and DPI focus is on professional / clinical health care vs. personal / home health.
+::: The DPI WP will reflect this focus.  For example, the initial DPI profiles & roadmap will focus on clinical scenarios, while at the same time ensuring extension to home contexts as necessary and applicable.
+:* ICE Draft Review (Rhoads)
+:::- John provided a review of drafting work he has done on the "ICE" Appendix.
+:::- Main message should be:  '''''DPI supports ICE architectures, starting at the lowest connectivity levels'''''
+:::- Audience may not have a clue about ICE, so the section should start with a brief overview & references
+:::- The Appendix should include:
+:::::> ICE Overview / Backgrounder
+:::::> ICE-PAC Overview, process review & sample analyses
+:::::> Specific requirements for the IHE PCD TF, especially DPI profiles
+:::::> Roadmap discussion, correlating with the main Roadmap section earlier in the document
+:::- Given the potential size of the ICE-related material, this section should provide only general information to achieve the main objective (stated above) and should defer more detailed treatment of the ICE-PAC material to a White Paper or other such document.  '''''The main purpose of this WP is DPI, not ICE''''' - so balance in the amount of material should be maintained, while at the same time clearly pointing to the integration of the two efforts.
+:::- ICE will be mentioned earlier in the document, esp. in the clinical contexts section and the architectures discussion.
 '''Decisions/Issues:'''
@@ Line 90: / Line 113: @@
 | '''Status/Discussion:'''
 '''Decisions/Issues:'''
-:* Next meeting:     <TBD>
+:* Next meeting:     Thursday, 2009.08.27
 '''Action(s):'''
@@ Line 98: / Line 121: @@
 === Next Meeting ===
-''NOTE:  Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time:   '''<TBD>''' (120 minutes)''
+''NOTE:  Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time:   [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-27_WebEx | 2009.08.27]] (120 minutes ... max!)''
@@ Line 107: / Line 130: @@
 [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
 [[Category:PCD_DPI]]
-[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
+[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]]