Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2009-07-23 WebEx"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m (Updated Notes) |
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m (→Discussion Notes: Updated) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | :'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | ||
| − | :'''Participants:''' | + | :'''Participants:''' John Garguilo (NIST), George Panagiotopoulos (KP), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Anupriyo Chakravarti (SIS), Jeff Rinda (Hospira), Jan Wittenber (Philips), George Bertos (Baxter), John Rhoads (Philips) |
| + | |||
=== Discussion === | === Discussion === | ||
| Line 70: | Line 71: | ||
| '''General Scope / Status Update Discussion''' <br>- Group | | '''General Scope / Status Update Discussion''' <br>- Group | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
| − | :: ''NOTE:'' Todd was hosting this session while attending meetings in Minneapolis. So the notes are from ... memory!!! | + | :: '''''NOTE:''''' Todd was hosting this session while attending meetings in Minneapolis. So the notes are from ... memory!!! |
:: General summary points... | :: General summary points... | ||
| Line 77: | Line 78: | ||
:::* Business case mandatory! | :::* Business case mandatory! | ||
::::- Jeff Rinda recounted difficulty in examplaining DPI objectives to others within his company | ::::- Jeff Rinda recounted difficulty in examplaining DPI objectives to others within his company | ||
| − | ::::- Cannot be just support for futuristic applications / systems! | + | ::::- Cannot be just support for "futuristic" applications / systems! |
:::* Legacy no longer a big issue ... there are solutions available today for legacy devices - so this shouldn't be a major driver of DPI requirements. | :::* Legacy no longer a big issue ... there are solutions available today for legacy devices - so this shouldn't be a major driver of DPI requirements. | ||
| − | :::* Start with device specialization abstract info definitions | + | :::* Start with device specialization abstract info definitions (Wittenber) |
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
| Line 101: | Line 102: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
| − | :* Next meeting: | + | :* Next meeting: '''Note: Due to the IHE PCD Webinar + the 2 day MDPnP Program @ CIMIT, the next DPI discussion will not be until [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx | 2009.08.06]] |
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 109: | Line 110: | ||
=== Next Meeting === | === Next Meeting === | ||
| − | ''NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: ''' | + | ''NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: '''[[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx | 2009.08.06]]''' (120 minutes)'' |
Revision as of 23:48, 5 August 2009
(DPI Profile Main Page) DPI White Paper Page
Meeting Purpose
IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) White Paper development discussions.
WebEx Information
Topic: IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG
Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009
Time: 11:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)
Duration: 120 Minutes
Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.
Contact Manny Furst for more information.
Proposed Agenda
- 0. Review previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.07.09
- 1. Wittenber: Nurse PCA Blog Posting
- 2. Review DPI Materials (e.g., from HIMSS)
- 3. Status Update / Action Item Review
- 4. Planning / Next Session
Attachments / Materials
- (No attachments for this meeting)
Discussion Notes
Participants
- Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
- Participants: John Garguilo (NIST), George Panagiotopoulos (KP), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Anupriyo Chakravarti (SIS), Jeff Rinda (Hospira), Jan Wittenber (Philips), George Bertos (Baxter), John Rhoads (Philips)
Discussion
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Agenda approved
Action(s):
2 Approval of Discussion Notes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Reviewed and approved 2009.07.09 Discussion Notes
Action(s):
3 General Scope / Status Update Discussion
- GroupStatus/Discussion: - NOTE: Todd was hosting this session while attending meetings in Minneapolis. So the notes are from ... memory!!!
- General summary points...
- Key requirement: Differentiate PoC integration benefits vs. enterprise integration
- Clearly differentiate Device-to-device integration vs. server-proxy integration
- Business case mandatory!
- - Jeff Rinda recounted difficulty in examplaining DPI objectives to others within his company
- - Cannot be just support for "futuristic" applications / systems!
- Legacy no longer a big issue ... there are solutions available today for legacy devices - so this shouldn't be a major driver of DPI requirements.
- General summary points...
- Start with device specialization abstract info definitions (Wittenber)
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 ...
- GroupStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
5 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting: Note: Due to the IHE PCD Webinar + the 2 day MDPnP Program @ CIMIT, the next DPI discussion will not be until 2009.08.06
Action(s):
Next Meeting
NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 2009.08.06 (120 minutes)
(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG <TBD>