Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2009-07-23 WebEx"

Latest revision as of 14:38, 17 May 2010

(DPI Profile Main Page) DPI White Paper Page

Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) White Paper development discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG

Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009

Time: 11:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)

Duration: 120 Minutes

Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

0. Review previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.07.09

1. Wittenber: Nurse PCA Blog Posting

2. Review DPI Materials (e.g., from HIMSS)

3. Status Update / Action Item Review

4. Planning / Next Session

Attachments / Materials

(No attachments for this meeting)

Discussion Notes

Participants

Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)

Participants: John Garguilo (NIST), George Panagiotopoulos (KP), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Anupriyo Chakravarti (SIS), Jeff Rinda (Hospira), Jan Wittenber (Philips), George Bertos (Baxter), John Rhoads (Philips)

Discussion

Item	Topic	Discussion
1	Introductions & Agenda Review - Chair	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Agenda approved Action(s):
2	Approval of Discussion Notes - Chair	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Reviewed and approved 2009.07.09 Discussion Notes Action(s):
3	General Scope / Status Update Discussion - Group	Status/Discussion: NOTE: Todd was hosting this session while attending meetings in Minneapolis. So the notes are from ... memory!!! General summary points... Key requirement: Differentiate PoC integration benefits vs. enterprise integration Clearly differentiate Device-to-device integration vs. server-proxy integration Business case mandatory! - Jeff Rinda recounted difficulty in examplaining DPI objectives to others within his company - Cannot be just support for "futuristic" applications / systems! Legacy no longer a big issue ... there are solutions available today for legacy devices - so this shouldn't be a major driver of DPI requirements. Start with device specialization abstract info definitions (Wittenber) Decisions/Issues: Action(s):
4	... - Group	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Action(s):
5	Next Meeting - Chair	Status/Discussion: Decisions/Issues: Next meeting: Note: Due to the IHE PCD Webinar + the 2 day MDPnP Program @ CIMIT, the next DPI discussion will not be until 2009.08.06 Action(s):

Next Meeting

NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 2009.08.06 (120 minutes)

(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG 2009.08.06 WebEx session

PCD Home

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 == Proposed Agenda ==
-:0.  Review [[PCD_DPI_2009-07-16_WebEx | previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.07.16]]
+:0.  Review [[PCD_DPI_2009-07-09_WebEx | previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.07.09]]
-:1.  Status Update / Action Item Review
+:1.  Wittenber:  Nurse PCA Blog Posting
-:2.  Review DPI WP Draft
+:2.  Review DPI Materials (e.g., from HIMSS)
-:3.  Planning / Next Session
+:3.  Status Update / Action Item Review
+:4.  Planning / Next Session
 == Attachments / Materials ==
@@ Line 38: / Line 39: @@
 :'''Chair/Host:'''  Todd Cooper (BSF)
-:'''Participants:'''  ''<tbd>''
+:'''Participants:'''  John Garguilo (NIST), George Panagiotopoulos (KP), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Anupriyo Chakravarti (SIS), Jeff Rinda (Hospira), Jan Wittenber (Philips), George Bertos (Baxter), John Rhoads (Philips)
 === Discussion ===
@@ Line 53: / Line 55: @@
 '''Decisions/Issues:'''
-:* Agenda ...
+:* Agenda approved
 '''Action(s):'''
@@ Line 62: / Line 64: @@
 '''Decisions/Issues:'''
-:* Reviewed and approved <page link>
+:* Reviewed and approved [[PCD_DPI_2009-07-09_WebEx | 2009.07.09 Discussion Notes]]
 '''Action(s):'''
 |-
 | align="center" | 3
-| '''...''' <br>- Group
+| '''General Scope / Status Update Discussion''' <br>- Group
 | '''Status/Discussion:'''
+:: '''''NOTE:'''''  Todd was hosting this session while attending meetings in Minneapolis.  So the notes are from ... memory!!!
+:: General summary points...
+:::* Key requirement:  Differentiate PoC integration benefits vs. enterprise integration
+:::* Clearly differentiate Device-to-device integration vs. server-proxy integration
+:::* Business case mandatory!
+::::- Jeff Rinda recounted difficulty in examplaining DPI objectives to others within his company
+::::- Cannot be just support for "futuristic" applications / systems!
+:::* Legacy no longer a big issue ... there are solutions available today for legacy devices - so this shouldn't be a major driver of DPI requirements.
+:::* Start with device specialization abstract info definitions (Wittenber)
 '''Decisions/Issues:'''
@@ Line 89: / Line 102: @@
 | '''Status/Discussion:'''
 '''Decisions/Issues:'''
-:* Next meeting:     <TBD>
+:* Next meeting:     '''Note:  Due to the IHE PCD Webinar + the 2 day MDPnP Program @ CIMIT, the next DPI discussion will not be until [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx | 2009.08.06]]
 '''Action(s):'''
@@ Line 97: / Line 110: @@
 === Next Meeting ===
-''NOTE:  Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time:   '''<TBD>''' (120 minutes)''
+''NOTE:  Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time:   '''[[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx | 2009.08.06]]''' (120 minutes)''
-''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG <TBD>''
+''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG [[PCD_DPI_2009-08-06_WebEx | 2009.08.06 WebEx session]]''
 [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
 [[Category:PCD_DPI]]
-[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
+[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]]