Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2009-07-23 WebEx"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m (→Next Meeting: Updated) |
|||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | ||
[[Category:PCD_DPI]] | [[Category:PCD_DPI]] | ||
− | [[Category:PCD Meeting]] | + | [[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]] |
Latest revision as of 14:38, 17 May 2010
(DPI Profile Main Page) DPI White Paper Page
Meeting Purpose
IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) White Paper development discussions.
WebEx Information
Topic: IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG
Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009
Time: 11:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)
Duration: 120 Minutes
Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.
Contact Manny Furst for more information.
Proposed Agenda
- 0. Review previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.07.09
- 1. Wittenber: Nurse PCA Blog Posting
- 2. Review DPI Materials (e.g., from HIMSS)
- 3. Status Update / Action Item Review
- 4. Planning / Next Session
Attachments / Materials
- (No attachments for this meeting)
Discussion Notes
Participants
- Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
- Participants: John Garguilo (NIST), George Panagiotopoulos (KP), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Anupriyo Chakravarti (SIS), Jeff Rinda (Hospira), Jan Wittenber (Philips), George Bertos (Baxter), John Rhoads (Philips)
Discussion
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Agenda approved
Action(s):
2 Approval of Discussion Notes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Reviewed and approved 2009.07.09 Discussion Notes
Action(s):
3 General Scope / Status Update Discussion
- GroupStatus/Discussion: - NOTE: Todd was hosting this session while attending meetings in Minneapolis. So the notes are from ... memory!!!
- General summary points...
- Key requirement: Differentiate PoC integration benefits vs. enterprise integration
- Clearly differentiate Device-to-device integration vs. server-proxy integration
- Business case mandatory!
- - Jeff Rinda recounted difficulty in examplaining DPI objectives to others within his company
- - Cannot be just support for "futuristic" applications / systems!
- Legacy no longer a big issue ... there are solutions available today for legacy devices - so this shouldn't be a major driver of DPI requirements.
- General summary points...
- Start with device specialization abstract info definitions (Wittenber)
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 ...
- GroupStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
5 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting: Note: Due to the IHE PCD Webinar + the 2 day MDPnP Program @ CIMIT, the next DPI discussion will not be until 2009.08.06
Action(s):
Next Meeting
NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 2009.08.06 (120 minutes)
(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG 2009.08.06 WebEx session