Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2009-07-23 WebEx"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Updated Notes)
Line 39: Line 39:
 
:'''Chair/Host:'''  Todd Cooper (BSF)
 
:'''Chair/Host:'''  Todd Cooper (BSF)
  
:'''Participants:'''  ''<tbd>''
+
:'''Participants:'''  '''''<tbd>'''''
  
 
=== Discussion ===  
 
=== Discussion ===  
Line 54: Line 54:
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* Agenda ...
+
:* Agenda approved
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
Line 63: Line 63:
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:* Reviewed and approved <page link>
+
:* Reviewed and approved [[PCD_DPI_2009-07-09_WebEx | 2009.07.09 Discussion Notes]]
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 3
 
| align="center" | 3
| '''...''' <br>- Group
+
| '''General Scope / Status Update Discussion''' <br>- Group
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
:: ''NOTE:''  Todd was hosting this session while attending meetings in Minneapolis.  So the notes are from ... memory!!! 
 +
 +
:: General summary points...
 +
:::* Key requirement:  Differentiate PoC integration benefits vs. enterprise integration
 +
:::* Clearly differentiate Device-to-device integration vs. server-proxy integration
 +
:::* Business case mandatory!
 +
::::- Jeff Rinda recounted difficulty in examplaining DPI objectives to others within his company
 +
::::- Cannot be just support for futuristic applications / systems!
 +
:::* Legacy no longer a big issue ... there are solutions available today for legacy devices - so this shouldn't be a major driver of DPI requirements.
 +
 +
:::* Start with device specialization abstract info definitions ...
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''

Revision as of 22:37, 5 August 2009

(DPI Profile Main Page) DPI White Paper Page


Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) White Paper development discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG

Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009

Time: 11:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)

Duration: 120 Minutes


Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

0. Review previous WebEx discussion notes from 2009.07.09
1. Wittenber: Nurse PCA Blog Posting
2. Review DPI Materials (e.g., from HIMSS)
3. Status Update / Action Item Review
4. Planning / Next Session

Attachments / Materials

  • (No attachments for this meeting)

Discussion Notes

Participants

Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
Participants: <tbd>

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Approval of Discussion Notes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 General Scope / Status Update Discussion
- Group
Status/Discussion:
NOTE: Todd was hosting this session while attending meetings in Minneapolis. So the notes are from ... memory!!!
General summary points...
  • Key requirement: Differentiate PoC integration benefits vs. enterprise integration
  • Clearly differentiate Device-to-device integration vs. server-proxy integration
  • Business case mandatory!
- Jeff Rinda recounted difficulty in examplaining DPI objectives to others within his company
- Cannot be just support for futuristic applications / systems!
  • Legacy no longer a big issue ... there are solutions available today for legacy devices - so this shouldn't be a major driver of DPI requirements.
  • Start with device specialization abstract info definitions ...

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 ...
- Group
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):


5 Next Meeting
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Next meeting: <TBD>

Action(s):

Next Meeting

NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: <TBD> (120 minutes)


(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG <TBD>


PCD Home