Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2009-05-14 WebEx"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m (Updated) |
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m (Updated) |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
:* Note: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Profiles/DPI/20090514_DPI_WebEx See the MindMap and other materials loaded onto the IHE PCD FTP site.] | :* Note: [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Profiles/DPI/20090514_DPI_WebEx See the MindMap and other materials loaded onto the IHE PCD FTP site.] | ||
+ | :* Reviewed Presentations & Draft WP documents developed to date | ||
+ | :* ACTIONS related to specific WP discussions are listed below | ||
+ | :* WP Discussion included: | ||
+ | ::- Point-of-care includes "care" ... thus the clinician providing the care must be included! | ||
+ | ::- Include an Annex re. "MIB for Dummies" with examples extrated from MDCIG II document; morel detailed & focused examples will be addressed in the specific profile supplement documents (e.g., DPI-DR or DPI-SYM). | ||
+ | ::- Section 2 Executive Summary includes "operational" (i.e., architectural) and development (i.e., logical subsets, implementation alternatives) aspects. | ||
+ | ::- Should discuss use contexts, both topological and clinical workflow-based (which crossover between contexts) | ||
+ | ::- "Data types & examples" in the NIST WP draft, are NOT EXHAUSTIVE! | ||
+ | ::- Figure 5 - Directory is an extension of DEC... | ||
+ | ::- Figure 9 was not fully developed and should be "ignored" | ||
+ | :* Use of DPI Arcitecture Diagram (developed by Jan for NIST discussion): | ||
+ | ::- Should present diagram and then show how solutions for various use case subsets could be developed using this model | ||
+ | ::- Include the model in Section 4 Point-of-Care, and then lead into / leverage for Section 5 | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* Phasing (Slide #8) - the IHE PCD & DPI work program and ROADMAP should include: | ||
+ | ::- Detailed device models (using ICS generator) | ||
+ | ::- Validation using the NIST "test harness" | ||
+ | ::- NOTE: The RoadMap section should address problem space similarly to what was done in the MDCIG program. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* Device specialization development - for the initial devices, it was pointed out that there is significant momentum active: | ||
+ | ::- Physiological monitors are alread well represented in the Rosetta | ||
+ | ::- Infusion pump activity progressing (e.g., F2F in San Diego May 19 & 20) | ||
+ | ::- Vent Term Team meetings every couple of weeks to fill that gap. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* Sandy asked about support for additional use cases such as: | ||
+ | ::- ICE related applications (Note: This will be addressed in a WP appendix) | ||
+ | ::- Pandemic support by integrated medical devices, such as collection of "local" data that feeds to the EHR (Note: this should be addressed by the DPI, DEC, and RTM profiles, which should also be leveraged by the HITSP CmDC use case analysis. | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
Line 81: | Line 108: | ||
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Update DPI wiki page's Discussion Participants section | :* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Update DPI wiki page's Discussion Participants section | ||
:* '''ACTION:''' (Rhoads/Cooper) Add updated Glossary section to White Paper; Rhoads to provide the content to Cooper. | :* '''ACTION:''' (Rhoads/Cooper) Add updated Glossary section to White Paper; Rhoads to provide the content to Cooper. | ||
+ | :* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Update WP to 0.3 including content from Jan's "NIST" version (incl. Exective Summary section) | ||
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Add Section 7.2 MEM; and include an SNMP discussion | :* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Add Section 7.2 MEM; and include an SNMP discussion | ||
:* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Add Section 7.3 Semantic Architecture (or Rosetta) for Device Specializations | :* '''ACTION:''' (Cooper) Add Section 7.3 Semantic Architecture (or Rosetta) for Device Specializations |
Revision as of 14:58, 18 May 2009
(DPI Profile Main Page) DPI White Paper Page
Meeting Purpose
IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) White Paper development discussions.
WebEx Information
Topic: IHE PCD DPI White Paper TG
Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009
Time: 15:00, Eastern Time (GMT -05:00, New York)
Duration: 120 Minutes
Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.
Contact Manny Furst for more information.
Proposed Agenda
- 1. DPI WP Programme Review
- 2. Review Current WP Draft
- 3. Open discussion
Attachments / Materials
(No attachments)
Minutes
Participants
- Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
- Anupriyo Chakravarti (SIS), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), John Garguilo (NIST), John Rhoads (Philips), Sandy Weininger (FDA/CDRH), Jan Wittenber (Philips)
Discussion
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Agenda reviewed and approved
Action(s):
2 Approval of Discussion Notes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: - No discussion notes to review / approve at this time.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
3 Documents to Date Reviewed
- GroupStatus/Discussion: - Reviewed Presentations & Draft WP documents developed to date
- ACTIONS related to specific WP discussions are listed below
- WP Discussion included:
- - Point-of-care includes "care" ... thus the clinician providing the care must be included!
- - Include an Annex re. "MIB for Dummies" with examples extrated from MDCIG II document; morel detailed & focused examples will be addressed in the specific profile supplement documents (e.g., DPI-DR or DPI-SYM).
- - Section 2 Executive Summary includes "operational" (i.e., architectural) and development (i.e., logical subsets, implementation alternatives) aspects.
- - Should discuss use contexts, both topological and clinical workflow-based (which crossover between contexts)
- - "Data types & examples" in the NIST WP draft, are NOT EXHAUSTIVE!
- - Figure 5 - Directory is an extension of DEC...
- - Figure 9 was not fully developed and should be "ignored"
- Use of DPI Arcitecture Diagram (developed by Jan for NIST discussion):
- - Should present diagram and then show how solutions for various use case subsets could be developed using this model
- - Include the model in Section 4 Point-of-Care, and then lead into / leverage for Section 5
- Phasing (Slide #8) - the IHE PCD & DPI work program and ROADMAP should include:
- - Detailed device models (using ICS generator)
- - Validation using the NIST "test harness"
- - NOTE: The RoadMap section should address problem space similarly to what was done in the MDCIG program.
- Device specialization development - for the initial devices, it was pointed out that there is significant momentum active:
- - Physiological monitors are alread well represented in the Rosetta
- - Infusion pump activity progressing (e.g., F2F in San Diego May 19 & 20)
- - Vent Term Team meetings every couple of weeks to fill that gap.
- Sandy asked about support for additional use cases such as:
- - ICE related applications (Note: This will be addressed in a WP appendix)
- - Pandemic support by integrated medical devices, such as collection of "local" data that feeds to the EHR (Note: this should be addressed by the DPI, DEC, and RTM profiles, which should also be leveraged by the HITSP CmDC use case analysis.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
- ACTION: (Cooper) Update DPI wiki page's Discussion Participants section
- ACTION: (Rhoads/Cooper) Add updated Glossary section to White Paper; Rhoads to provide the content to Cooper.
- ACTION: (Cooper) Update WP to 0.3 including content from Jan's "NIST" version (incl. Exective Summary section)
- ACTION: (Cooper) Add Section 7.2 MEM; and include an SNMP discussion
- ACTION: (Cooper) Add Section 7.3 Semantic Architecture (or Rosetta) for Device Specializations
- ACTION: (Group) Define how the Device ICS' w/ NIST tools & volume 3 / RTM support will enable DPI verification & conformance testing.
- ACTION: (Cooper) Develop an Annex with a simple example from UML model to data definitions to message sequence diagram examples. Link to previoius MDCIG activitie (e.g., MDCIG Demo II document), and include sample information from that document.
4 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting <TBD>
Action(s):
Next Meeting
NOTE: Next Meeting will be held during the regularly scheduled time: 2009.05.18 (120 minutes)
(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG <TBD>