Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2008-10-09 WebEx"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
:5 PCD Profile Relationships
 
:5 PCD Profile Relationships
 
::* Device Specializations vs. Transaction
 
::* Device Specializations vs. Transaction
−
::* PnP & Transaction Packages"  (see [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/DPI/X73_Archive/MDCIG_MIB_Demo_II_Spec_rev_1.14b.doc MDCIG Demo II Document])
+
::* PnP & "Transaction Packages"  (see [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/DPI/X73_Archive/MDCIG_MIB_Demo_II_Spec_rev_1.14b.doc MDCIG Demo II Document])
 
:7 Profile Proposal Drafting for Boston
 
:7 Profile Proposal Drafting for Boston
 
::* DPI White Paper
 
::* DPI White Paper
Line 38: Line 38:
 
::* Major Sections
 
::* Major Sections
 
::* Use Case Organization & Requirements Derivation
 
::* Use Case Organization & Requirements Derivation
−
::* Framework components
+
::* Framework of PCD Profiles
 
::* ...
 
::* ...
−
:9 Open discussion
+
:9 Planning / Recruitment
 +
::* Topics for next week's discussion sessions:
 +
::::[[PCD_DPI_2008-10-17_WebEx | 2008.10.17  Discussion Session]]
 +
::::[[PCD_DPI_2008-10-15_WebEx | 2008.10.15  Discussion Session]]
 +
::::[[PCD_DPI_2008-10-13_WebEx | 2008.10.13  Discussion Session]]
  
 
== Attachments / Materials ==
 
== Attachments / Materials ==
Line 55: Line 59:
 
:'''Chair/Host:'''  Todd Cooper (BSF)
 
:'''Chair/Host:'''  Todd Cooper (BSF)
  
−
: '''<tbd>'''
+
: Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), John Blasingame (Philips), Phil Raymond (Philips), John Rhoads (Philips), Jan Wittenber (Philips)
  
 
=== Discussion ===  
 
=== Discussion ===  
Line 69: Line 73:
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
−
:* ...
+
:* Reviewed & Approved Agenda
 +
 
 +
:'''''NOTE:  The group didn't get to Agenda Items #5 to #9.'''''
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
Line 77: Line 83:
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
−
:* ...
+
:* Approved minutes from ...
 +
:::- [[PCD_DPI_2008-09-12_WebEx | 2008.09.12 (Pre-Vancouver)]]
 +
:::- [[PCD_DPI_2008-09-22_WebEx | 2008.09.22 (Post-Vancouver)]]
 +
:::- [[PCD_DPI_2008-10-02_WebEx | 2008.10.02]]
 +
 
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
Line 84: Line 94:
 
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
:* ...
+
:* Action items were reviewed.
 +
 
 +
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 +
 
 +
'''Action(s):'''
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" | 4
 +
| '''DPI F2F Review''' <br>- Todd
 +
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
:* Reviewed the schedule & agenda for the [[PCD_DPI_2008-10-23_to_24_F2F#Preliminary_Agenda_Topics | DPI F2F 2008.10.23 & 24]].
 +
:* Agenda topics updated accordingly.
 +
 
 +
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 +
:* Thursday afternoon should start with a discussion of the DPI Scope.
 +
:* Friday should include a key goal of coordination with the ICE & MDPnP groups.
 +
 
 +
'''Action(s):'''
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" | 5
 +
| '''DPI Scope Discussion''' <br>- Group
 +
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
:* Jan raised the issue regarding the DPI scope definition.  Todd indicated that...
 +
:::- In previous discussions, the "big picture" had been balancing between DEC "enterprise" integration and DPI "point-of-care" integration
 +
:::- It did involve device direct plug-and-play links
 +
:* The use cases discussed in previous DPI sessions, including the draft PnP Supplement from 2007.06, shall define the DPI scope.  These shall be inlcuded in the white paper.  NOTE:  Use cases may be used to indicate both what is IN the profiles and what is excluded from them.  In other words, a given use case may include components that are provided by DPI profiles, but may also include those which are closer to enterprise or multi-enterprise integration.
 +
 
 +
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 +
 
 +
'''Action(s):'''
 +
:* (Todd) Draft proposal DPI scope statement for review at the Monday 2008.10.13 discussion session.
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" | 6
 +
| '''General DPI Scope / Issues Discussion''' <br>- Group
 +
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
:* Relationship to PHD devices & non-clinical care contexts:
 +
:::- Does DPI address connection of a PHD device to a clinical DPI network?
 +
:::- Does DPI address deployment of DPI profiles in a non-clinical (e.g., home) context that includes PHD devices?
 +
:* QUESTION:  Does DPI focus solely on clinical PoC integration?
 +
:* Use Case: 
 +
:::- Dr. in car w/ PDA ... view & control device
 +
:::- Includes non-DPI PCD profiles such as DEC, ACM, MEM, ...
 +
:::- Includes non-PCD profiles
 +
:* Use Case:  RTLS & MEM
 +
:* Use Case:  Patient ID Binding (incl. RFID) ... DPI-PIB ...
 +
:* Use Case:  Mobile PoC (esp. in clinic)
 +
:* ICE & DPI:
 +
:::- ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI
 +
:::- ICE requirements partially addressed by DPI
 +
:::- ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI & other profiles (PCD & IHE)
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
−
:* ...
+
:* White Paper should include mixed-modality care contexts (see above discussion).
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
−
:* ...
+
:* (Todd) Review current IHE mechanisms (e.g., using wiki pages) for capturing & analyzing use cases.
  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| align="center" | 4
+
| align="center" | 7
−
| '''xyz''' <br>- Todd
+
| '''DPI Recruitment''' <br>- Todd
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
:* ...
+
:* Numerous members of the DPI team were absent from today's discussion. This could be because it was on the Yom Kippur holiday or the short notice of the schedule.
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 +
:* (Todd) Contact participants previously on the calls to ensure they are up-to-speed on DPI activities.
  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| align="center" | n
+
| align="center" | 8
 
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
Line 118: Line 179:
  
  
−
''<Add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">''
+
:'''''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG 2008-10-13)'''''
  
  
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
−
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
+
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]]

Latest revision as of 12:39, 24 January 2009

(DPI Profile Main Page)

Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) profile development discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI Profile TG

Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008

Time: 10:00, Eastern Daylight Time (GMT -04:00, New York)

Duration: 90 Minutes


Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

1 Approve Minutes from previous session
2 Review Action Items
3 FTP & wiki Site Review
4 F2F Preparation
5 PCD Profile Relationships
7 Profile Proposal Drafting for Boston
  • DPI White Paper
  • DPI-PnP
  • DPI-xyz?
  • Device Specialization: Physio Monitor, Vent, ...
8 DPI White Paper Outline (Drafting)
  • Major Sections
  • Use Case Organization & Requirements Derivation
  • Framework of PCD Profiles
  • ...
9 Planning / Recruitment
  • Topics for next week's discussion sessions:
2008.10.17 Discussion Session
2008.10.15 Discussion Session
2008.10.13 Discussion Session

Attachments / Materials

Minutes for approval:

2008.09.12 (Pre-Vancouver)
2008.09.22 (Post-Vancouver)
2008.10.02

Minutes

Participants

Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), John Blasingame (Philips), Phil Raymond (Philips), John Rhoads (Philips), Jan Wittenber (Philips)

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Reviewed & Approved Agenda
NOTE: The group didn't get to Agenda Items #5 to #9.

Action(s):

2 Approval of Minutes
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Approved minutes from ...
- 2008.09.12 (Pre-Vancouver)
- 2008.09.22 (Post-Vancouver)
- 2008.10.02


Action(s):

3 Action Items Review
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:
  • Action items were reviewed.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

4 DPI F2F Review
- Todd 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Thursday afternoon should start with a discussion of the DPI Scope.
  • Friday should include a key goal of coordination with the ICE & MDPnP groups.

Action(s):

5 DPI Scope Discussion
- Group 		Status/Discussion:
  • Jan raised the issue regarding the DPI scope definition. Todd indicated that...
- In previous discussions, the "big picture" had been balancing between DEC "enterprise" integration and DPI "point-of-care" integration
- It did involve device direct plug-and-play links
  • The use cases discussed in previous DPI sessions, including the draft PnP Supplement from 2007.06, shall define the DPI scope. These shall be inlcuded in the white paper. NOTE: Use cases may be used to indicate both what is IN the profiles and what is excluded from them. In other words, a given use case may include components that are provided by DPI profiles, but may also include those which are closer to enterprise or multi-enterprise integration.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • (Todd) Draft proposal DPI scope statement for review at the Monday 2008.10.13 discussion session.
6 General DPI Scope / Issues Discussion
- Group 		Status/Discussion:
  • Relationship to PHD devices & non-clinical care contexts:
- Does DPI address connection of a PHD device to a clinical DPI network?
- Does DPI address deployment of DPI profiles in a non-clinical (e.g., home) context that includes PHD devices?
  • QUESTION: Does DPI focus solely on clinical PoC integration?
  • Use Case:
- Dr. in car w/ PDA ... view & control device
- Includes non-DPI PCD profiles such as DEC, ACM, MEM, ...
- Includes non-PCD profiles
  • Use Case: RTLS & MEM
  • Use Case: Patient ID Binding (incl. RFID) ... DPI-PIB ...
  • Use Case: Mobile PoC (esp. in clinic)
  • ICE & DPI:
- ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI
- ICE requirements partially addressed by DPI
- ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI & other profiles (PCD & IHE)

Decisions/Issues:

  • White Paper should include mixed-modality care contexts (see above discussion).

Action(s):

  • (Todd) Review current IHE mechanisms (e.g., using wiki pages) for capturing & analyzing use cases.
7 DPI Recruitment
- Todd 		Status/Discussion:
  • Numerous members of the DPI team were absent from today's discussion. This could be because it was on the Yom Kippur holiday or the short notice of the schedule.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

  • (Todd) Contact participants previously on the calls to ensure they are up-to-speed on DPI activities.
8 Next Meeting
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Next meeting will be scheduled for Monday 2008.10.13

Action(s):

Next Meeting

Next meeting scheduled for Monday, 2008-10-13 @ 10:00 - 11:30 Eastern


(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG 2008-10-13)


PCD Home

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_DPI_2008-10-09_WebEx&oldid=29237"