Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2008-10-09 WebEx"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ToddCooper (talk | contribs) m (→Attachments / Materials: Added minutes links) |
m (→Next Meeting) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::* [[PCD_DPI_2008-10-23_to_24_F2F#Preliminary_Agenda_Topics | Agenda Topics]] | ::* [[PCD_DPI_2008-10-23_to_24_F2F#Preliminary_Agenda_Topics | Agenda Topics]] | ||
:5 PCD Profile Relationships | :5 PCD Profile Relationships | ||
− | : | + | ::* Device Specializations vs. Transaction |
+ | ::* PnP & "Transaction Packages" (see [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/DPI/X73_Archive/MDCIG_MIB_Demo_II_Spec_rev_1.14b.doc MDCIG Demo II Document]) | ||
+ | :7 Profile Proposal Drafting for Boston | ||
::* DPI White Paper | ::* DPI White Paper | ||
::* DPI-PnP | ::* DPI-PnP | ||
::* DPI-xyz? | ::* DPI-xyz? | ||
::* Device Specialization: Physio Monitor, Vent, ... | ::* Device Specialization: Physio Monitor, Vent, ... | ||
− | : | + | :8 DPI White Paper Outline (Drafting) |
− | : | + | ::* Major Sections |
+ | ::* Use Case Organization & Requirements Derivation | ||
+ | ::* Framework of PCD Profiles | ||
+ | ::* ... | ||
+ | :9 Planning / Recruitment | ||
+ | ::* Topics for next week's discussion sessions: | ||
+ | ::::[[PCD_DPI_2008-10-17_WebEx | 2008.10.17 Discussion Session]] | ||
+ | ::::[[PCD_DPI_2008-10-15_WebEx | 2008.10.15 Discussion Session]] | ||
+ | ::::[[PCD_DPI_2008-10-13_WebEx | 2008.10.13 Discussion Session]] | ||
== Attachments / Materials == | == Attachments / Materials == | ||
Line 49: | Line 59: | ||
:'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | :'''Chair/Host:''' Todd Cooper (BSF) | ||
− | : | + | : Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), John Blasingame (Philips), Phil Raymond (Philips), John Rhoads (Philips), Jan Wittenber (Philips) |
=== Discussion === | === Discussion === | ||
Line 63: | Line 73: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
− | :* . | + | :* Reviewed & Approved Agenda |
+ | |||
+ | :'''''NOTE: The group didn't get to Agenda Items #5 to #9.''''' | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
Line 71: | Line 83: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
− | :* ... | + | :* Approved minutes from ... |
+ | :::- [[PCD_DPI_2008-09-12_WebEx | 2008.09.12 (Pre-Vancouver)]] | ||
+ | :::- [[PCD_DPI_2008-09-22_WebEx | 2008.09.22 (Post-Vancouver)]] | ||
+ | :::- [[PCD_DPI_2008-10-02_WebEx | 2008.10.02]] | ||
+ | |||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
Line 78: | Line 94: | ||
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair | | '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
− | :* ... | + | :* Action items were reviewed. |
+ | |||
+ | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Action(s):''' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | align="center" | 4 | ||
+ | | '''DPI F2F Review''' <br>- Todd | ||
+ | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
+ | :* Reviewed the schedule & agenda for the [[PCD_DPI_2008-10-23_to_24_F2F#Preliminary_Agenda_Topics | DPI F2F 2008.10.23 & 24]]. | ||
+ | :* Agenda topics updated accordingly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
+ | :* Thursday afternoon should start with a discussion of the DPI Scope. | ||
+ | :* Friday should include a key goal of coordination with the ICE & MDPnP groups. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Action(s):''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | align="center" | 5 | ||
+ | | '''DPI Scope Discussion''' <br>- Group | ||
+ | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
+ | :* Jan raised the issue regarding the DPI scope definition. Todd indicated that... | ||
+ | :::- In previous discussions, the "big picture" had been balancing between DEC "enterprise" integration and DPI "point-of-care" integration | ||
+ | :::- It did involve device direct plug-and-play links | ||
+ | :* The use cases discussed in previous DPI sessions, including the draft PnP Supplement from 2007.06, shall define the DPI scope. These shall be inlcuded in the white paper. NOTE: Use cases may be used to indicate both what is IN the profiles and what is excluded from them. In other words, a given use case may include components that are provided by DPI profiles, but may also include those which are closer to enterprise or multi-enterprise integration. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Action(s):''' | ||
+ | :* (Todd) Draft proposal DPI scope statement for review at the Monday 2008.10.13 discussion session. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | align="center" | 6 | ||
+ | | '''General DPI Scope / Issues Discussion''' <br>- Group | ||
+ | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
+ | :* Relationship to PHD devices & non-clinical care contexts: | ||
+ | :::- Does DPI address connection of a PHD device to a clinical DPI network? | ||
+ | :::- Does DPI address deployment of DPI profiles in a non-clinical (e.g., home) context that includes PHD devices? | ||
+ | :* QUESTION: Does DPI focus solely on clinical PoC integration? | ||
+ | :* Use Case: | ||
+ | :::- Dr. in car w/ PDA ... view & control device | ||
+ | :::- Includes non-DPI PCD profiles such as DEC, ACM, MEM, ... | ||
+ | :::- Includes non-PCD profiles | ||
+ | :* Use Case: RTLS & MEM | ||
+ | :* Use Case: Patient ID Binding (incl. RFID) ... DPI-PIB ... | ||
+ | :* Use Case: Mobile PoC (esp. in clinic) | ||
+ | :* ICE & DPI: | ||
+ | :::- ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI | ||
+ | :::- ICE requirements partially addressed by DPI | ||
+ | :::- ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI & other profiles (PCD & IHE) | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
− | :* | + | :* White Paper should include mixed-modality care contexts (see above discussion). |
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
− | :* ... | + | :* (Todd) Review current IHE mechanisms (e.g., using wiki pages) for capturing & analyzing use cases. |
|- | |- | ||
− | | align="center" | | + | | align="center" | 7 |
− | | ''' | + | | '''DPI Recruitment''' <br>- Todd |
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
− | :* . | + | :* Numerous members of the DPI team were absent from today's discussion. This could be because it was on the Yom Kippur holiday or the short notice of the schedule. |
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
+ | :* (Todd) Contact participants previously on the calls to ensure they are up-to-speed on DPI activities. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | align="center" | | + | | align="center" | 8 |
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair | | '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
Line 112: | Line 179: | ||
− | '' | + | :'''''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG 2008-10-13)''''' |
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | ||
− | [[Category:PCD Meeting]] | + | [[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]] |
Latest revision as of 12:39, 24 January 2009
Meeting Purpose
IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) profile development discussions.
WebEx Information
Topic: IHE PCD DPI Profile TG
Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008
Time: 10:00, Eastern Daylight Time (GMT -04:00, New York)
Duration: 90 Minutes
Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.
Contact Manny Furst for more information.
Proposed Agenda
- 1 Approve Minutes from previous session
- 2 Review Action Items
- 3 FTP & wiki Site Review
- 4 F2F Preparation
- Thursday & Friday Participants
- Agenda Topics
- 5 PCD Profile Relationships
- Device Specializations vs. Transaction
- PnP & "Transaction Packages" (see MDCIG Demo II Document)
- 7 Profile Proposal Drafting for Boston
- DPI White Paper
- DPI-PnP
- DPI-xyz?
- Device Specialization: Physio Monitor, Vent, ...
- 8 DPI White Paper Outline (Drafting)
- Major Sections
- Use Case Organization & Requirements Derivation
- Framework of PCD Profiles
- ...
- 9 Planning / Recruitment
- Topics for next week's discussion sessions:
Attachments / Materials
Minutes for approval:
Minutes
Participants
- Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
- Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), John Blasingame (Philips), Phil Raymond (Philips), John Rhoads (Philips), Jan Wittenber (Philips)
Discussion
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Reviewed & Approved Agenda
- NOTE: The group didn't get to Agenda Items #5 to #9.
Action(s):
2 Approval of Minutes
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Approved minutes from ...
Action(s):3 Action Items Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: - Action items were reviewed.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 DPI F2F Review
- ToddStatus/Discussion: - Reviewed the schedule & agenda for the DPI F2F 2008.10.23 & 24.
- Agenda topics updated accordingly.
Decisions/Issues:
- Thursday afternoon should start with a discussion of the DPI Scope.
- Friday should include a key goal of coordination with the ICE & MDPnP groups.
Action(s):
5 DPI Scope Discussion
- GroupStatus/Discussion: - Jan raised the issue regarding the DPI scope definition. Todd indicated that...
- - In previous discussions, the "big picture" had been balancing between DEC "enterprise" integration and DPI "point-of-care" integration
- - It did involve device direct plug-and-play links
- The use cases discussed in previous DPI sessions, including the draft PnP Supplement from 2007.06, shall define the DPI scope. These shall be inlcuded in the white paper. NOTE: Use cases may be used to indicate both what is IN the profiles and what is excluded from them. In other words, a given use case may include components that are provided by DPI profiles, but may also include those which are closer to enterprise or multi-enterprise integration.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
- (Todd) Draft proposal DPI scope statement for review at the Monday 2008.10.13 discussion session.
6 General DPI Scope / Issues Discussion
- GroupStatus/Discussion: - Relationship to PHD devices & non-clinical care contexts:
- - Does DPI address connection of a PHD device to a clinical DPI network?
- - Does DPI address deployment of DPI profiles in a non-clinical (e.g., home) context that includes PHD devices?
- QUESTION: Does DPI focus solely on clinical PoC integration?
- Use Case:
- - Dr. in car w/ PDA ... view & control device
- - Includes non-DPI PCD profiles such as DEC, ACM, MEM, ...
- - Includes non-PCD profiles
- Use Case: RTLS & MEM
- Use Case: Patient ID Binding (incl. RFID) ... DPI-PIB ...
- Use Case: Mobile PoC (esp. in clinic)
- ICE & DPI:
- - ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI
- - ICE requirements partially addressed by DPI
- - ICE requirements totally addressed by DPI & other profiles (PCD & IHE)
Decisions/Issues:
- White Paper should include mixed-modality care contexts (see above discussion).
Action(s):
- (Todd) Review current IHE mechanisms (e.g., using wiki pages) for capturing & analyzing use cases.
7 DPI Recruitment
- ToddStatus/Discussion: - Numerous members of the DPI team were absent from today's discussion. This could be because it was on the Yom Kippur holiday or the short notice of the schedule.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
- (Todd) Contact participants previously on the calls to ensure they are up-to-speed on DPI activities.
8 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting will be scheduled for Monday 2008.10.13
Action(s):
Next Meeting
Next meeting scheduled for Monday, 2008-10-13 @ 10:00 - 11:30 Eastern
- (Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI TG 2008-10-13)