Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2008-10-02 WebEx"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Participants: Updated)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 50: Line 50:
 
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
No agenda was published.  The group decided on the agenda listed above.
 +
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
−
:* ...
 
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
Line 57: Line 58:
 
| align="center" | 2
 
| align="center" | 2
 
| '''Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
−
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
+
| '''Status/Discussion:''' No minutes were reviewed
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
−
:* ...
 
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 3
 
| align="center" | 3
−
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair
+
| '''Discussion & F2F Planning''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
:* ...
+
:* The group should schedule 3-4 WebEx sessions for the next two weeks (leading up to the Boston F2F).
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
−
:* ...
+
:* The Friday 2008.10.24 F2F meeting should be held at CIMIT.
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
−
:* ...
+
:* (Todd) Publish Doodle poll for 3-4 WebEx sessions over the next two weeks.
 +
:* (Todd) Contact Susan Whitehead (CIMIT/MDPnP) to arrange for Friday's room.
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 4
 
| align="center" | 4
−
| '''xyz''' <br>- Todd
+
| '''DPI White Paper Outline''' <br>- Todd
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
−
:* ...
+
The group discussed the general purpose & content of the proposed DPI White paper.  The following content was suggested:
 +
:* Use Cases - a substantive section describing representative scnearios and providing an analysis that indicates what components fall within the DPI scope and which are addressed by other profiles and constructs.
 +
:* 11073-00000 Framework & Overview document:  This DPI should be organized to directly inform the revised top-level 11073 Framework & Overview document.
 +
:* "ICE" Use Cases & conceptual architecture & requirements:  The DPI should also directly address the use cases, requirements and architetures identified in the ASTM F29 "ICE" standard. The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.
 +
:* DPI WP Front Matter...
 +
:::- Scope:  Differentiate DPI vs. DEC
 +
:::- Audience:  IHE TF developers
 +
:::- IHE PCD TF:  Should describe the relationship of DPI to the other PCD & IHE TF's
 +
:::- Regulatory Considerations:  Should point out that though DPI profiles support development of devices & systems that may fall under national regulatory oversight.
 +
:* Use Cases:  There should be a section that presents the use cases that define the DPI scope & the logical relationship between them
 +
:* Topological Model (leading from the use cases)
 +
:* PnP: The WP should describe the notion of PoC plug-and-play (e.g., across all 7 OSI Layers)
 +
:* Technological Archittecture...
 +
:::- Transports / Service model / Abstract Device Sematic & Service model
 +
:::- Peer-to-peer communication
 +
:::- Network Manager / Agent
 +
:* DPI Profile Framework (anticipated development items)
 +
:* Anticipated IHE documents...
 +
:::- White Papers
 +
:::- Users Handbook
 +
:* Service Components
 +
:::- Device Reporting
 +
:::- Device configuration (simple control)
 +
:::- "Symmetric" communciation (device as client)
 +
:::- External Control...
 +
:::: Basic PnP control
 +
:::: Safety Interlocks
 +
:::: "Simple" non-therapeutic Control
 +
:::: Therapeutic controls
 +
:::: Closed-loop control (incl. QoS requirements / "contract")
 +
:* ?ICE Supervisor function?
 +
:* ?Flight Recorder / Back Box (a la "real-time storage & retrieval")
 +
:* Relationship to ISO/IEEE 11073 Framework & Overview
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 +
:* The DPI WP should be drafted so as to directly inform the revision of the ISO/IEEE 11073-00000 Framework & Overview standard.
 +
:* The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 +
:* (Todd) Publish DPI White Paper outline  & process by 2008.10.05
 +
:* (Todd) Coordinate with Dr. Julian Goldman re. the Boston F2F schedule & agenda, and regarding IHE PCD sync with ICE & MDPnP work.
  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| align="center" | n
+
| align="center" | 5
 +
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
 +
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
Discusion topics for upcoming meetings should include:
 +
:* DPI Wireless Architecture
 +
:* White Paper Outline / Content Review (probably 2 sessions, one each week)
 +
:* 4th session topic TBD
 +
 
 +
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 +
 
 +
'''Action(s):'''
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" | 6
 
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
Line 100: Line 149:
  
  
−
''<Add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">''
+
'''''(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI WG 2008-10-09)'''''
  
  
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
−
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
+
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]]

Latest revision as of 12:38, 24 January 2009

(DPI Profile Main Page)

Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) profile development discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI Profile TG

Date: Monday, October 2, 2008

Time: 10:30, Eastern Daylight Time (GMT -04:00, New York)

Duration: 90 Minutes


Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

1 DPI Status Review
2 WebEx Planning
3 F2F Planning
4 White Paper Outline
5 Open discussion

Attachments / Materials

(no minutes were reviewed in this meeting)

Minutes

Participants

Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Steve Merritt (Baystate Health), John Rhoads (Philips)

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

No agenda was published. The group decided on the agenda listed above.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

2 Approval of Minutes
- Chair 		Status/Discussion: No minutes were reviewed

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Discussion & F2F Planning
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:
  • The group should schedule 3-4 WebEx sessions for the next two weeks (leading up to the Boston F2F).

Decisions/Issues:

  • The Friday 2008.10.24 F2F meeting should be held at CIMIT.

Action(s):

  • (Todd) Publish Doodle poll for 3-4 WebEx sessions over the next two weeks.
  • (Todd) Contact Susan Whitehead (CIMIT/MDPnP) to arrange for Friday's room.
4 DPI White Paper Outline
- Todd 		Status/Discussion:

The group discussed the general purpose & content of the proposed DPI White paper. The following content was suggested:

  • Use Cases - a substantive section describing representative scnearios and providing an analysis that indicates what components fall within the DPI scope and which are addressed by other profiles and constructs.
  • 11073-00000 Framework & Overview document: This DPI should be organized to directly inform the revised top-level 11073 Framework & Overview document.
  • "ICE" Use Cases & conceptual architecture & requirements: The DPI should also directly address the use cases, requirements and architetures identified in the ASTM F29 "ICE" standard. The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.
  • DPI WP Front Matter...
- Scope: Differentiate DPI vs. DEC
- Audience: IHE TF developers
- IHE PCD TF: Should describe the relationship of DPI to the other PCD & IHE TF's
- Regulatory Considerations: Should point out that though DPI profiles support development of devices & systems that may fall under national regulatory oversight.
  • Use Cases: There should be a section that presents the use cases that define the DPI scope & the logical relationship between them
  • Topological Model (leading from the use cases)
  • PnP: The WP should describe the notion of PoC plug-and-play (e.g., across all 7 OSI Layers)
  • Technological Archittecture...
- Transports / Service model / Abstract Device Sematic & Service model
- Peer-to-peer communication
- Network Manager / Agent
  • DPI Profile Framework (anticipated development items)
  • Anticipated IHE documents...
- White Papers
- Users Handbook
  • Service Components
- Device Reporting
- Device configuration (simple control)
- "Symmetric" communciation (device as client)
- External Control...
Basic PnP control
Safety Interlocks
"Simple" non-therapeutic Control
Therapeutic controls
Closed-loop control (incl. QoS requirements / "contract")
  • ?ICE Supervisor function?
  • ?Flight Recorder / Back Box (a la "real-time storage & retrieval")
  • Relationship to ISO/IEEE 11073 Framework & Overview

Decisions/Issues:

  • The DPI WP should be drafted so as to directly inform the revision of the ISO/IEEE 11073-00000 Framework & Overview standard.
  • The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.

Action(s):

  • (Todd) Publish DPI White Paper outline & process by 2008.10.05
  • (Todd) Coordinate with Dr. Julian Goldman re. the Boston F2F schedule & agenda, and regarding IHE PCD sync with ICE & MDPnP work.
5 Next Meeting
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

Discusion topics for upcoming meetings should include:

  • DPI Wireless Architecture
  • White Paper Outline / Content Review (probably 2 sessions, one each week)
  • 4th session topic TBD

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

6 Next Meeting
- Chair 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Next meeting will be scheduled for Thursday 2008.10.09

Action(s):

Next Meeting

Next meeting scheduled for Thursday, 2008-10-09 @ 10:00 - 11:30 Eastern


(Reviewed & approved by PCD DPI WG 2008-10-09)


PCD Home

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_DPI_2008-10-02_WebEx&oldid=29236"