Difference between revisions of "PCD DPI 2008-10-02 WebEx"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Discussion: Updated)
m (→‎Discussion: Converted "raw" text to formatted text)
Line 79: Line 79:
 
| '''DPI White Paper Outline''' <br>- Todd
 
| '''DPI White Paper Outline''' <br>- Todd
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
The group discussed the general purpose & content of the proposed DPI White paper
+
The group discussed the general purpose & content of the proposed DPI White paper.  The following content was suggested:
 +
:* Use Cases - a substantive section describing representative scnearios and providing an analysis that indicates what components fall within the DPI scope and which are addressed by other profiles and constructs.
 +
:* 11073-00000 Framework & Overview document:  This DPI should be organized to directly inform the revised top-level 11073 Framework & Overview document.
 +
:* "ICE" Use Cases & conceptual architecture & requirements:  The DPI should also directly address the use cases, requirements and architetures identified in the ASTM F29 "ICE" standard.  The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.
  
 
'''''NOTE - THESE ARE TODD'S RAW NOTES ... TO BE FORMATTED AFTER THE 2008.10.09 WEBEX'''''
 
'''''NOTE - THESE ARE TODD'S RAW NOTES ... TO BE FORMATTED AFTER THE 2008.10.09 WEBEX'''''
 
DPI White Paper Outline  
 
DPI White Paper Outline  
        - use cases
 
        - lean toward 11073 F&O Document Revision
 
        - ICE use cases ...
 
 
         - Contents
 
         - Contents
 
                 Front matter...
 
                 Front matter...
Line 121: Line 121:
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
:*  
+
:* The DPI WP should be drafted so as to directly inform the revision of the ISO/IEEE 11073-00000 Framework & Overview standard.
 +
:* The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''

Revision as of 22:12, 9 October 2008

(DPI Profile Main Page)

Meeting Purpose

IHE PCD Device Point-of-care Integration (DPI) profile development discussions.

WebEx Information

Topic: IHE PCD DPI Profile TG

Date: Monday, October 2, 2008

Time: 10:30, Eastern Daylight Time (GMT -04:00, New York)

Duration: 90 Minutes


Note: Specific web & phone informaiton will be provided via e-mail to group members.

Contact Manny Furst for more information.

Proposed Agenda

1 DPI Status Review
2 WebEx Planning
3 F2F Planning
4 White Paper Outline
5 Open discussion

Attachments / Materials

(no minutes were reviewed in this meeting)

Minutes

Participants

Chair/Host: Todd Cooper (BSF)
Steve Borchers (Spacelabs), Ken Fuchs (Draeger), Steve Merritt (Baystate Health), John Rhoads (Philips)

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

No agenda was published. The group decided on the agenda listed above.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

2 Approval of Minutes
- Chair
Status/Discussion: No minutes were reviewed

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Discussion & F2F Planning
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
  • The group should schedule 3-4 WebEx sessions for the next two weeks (leading up to the Boston F2F).

Decisions/Issues:

  • The Friday 2008.10.24 F2F meeting should be held at CIMIT.

Action(s):

  • (Todd) Publish Doodle poll for 3-4 WebEx sessions over the next two weeks.
  • (Todd) Contact Susan Whitehead (CIMIT/MDPnP) to arrange for Friday's room.
4 DPI White Paper Outline
- Todd
Status/Discussion:

The group discussed the general purpose & content of the proposed DPI White paper. The following content was suggested:

  • Use Cases - a substantive section describing representative scnearios and providing an analysis that indicates what components fall within the DPI scope and which are addressed by other profiles and constructs.
  • 11073-00000 Framework & Overview document: This DPI should be organized to directly inform the revised top-level 11073 Framework & Overview document.
  • "ICE" Use Cases & conceptual architecture & requirements: The DPI should also directly address the use cases, requirements and architetures identified in the ASTM F29 "ICE" standard. The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.

NOTE - THESE ARE TODD'S RAW NOTES ... TO BE FORMATTED AFTER THE 2008.10.09 WEBEX DPI White Paper Outline

       - Contents
                Front matter...
                         scope:  DPI vs. DEC
                         audience:        IHE TF Developers
                         IHE TF's:  Relationship of DPI with other PCD & IHE frameworks
                         Regulatory considerations - cross reference white paper
                use cases & logical relationships between them 
                Topological model (leading from use cases)
                Plug-and-Play - across all 7 layers
                Technological architecture:  transports / service model / device abstract model
                         Peer to peer
                         Network Manager / Agent
                Anticipated framework of profiles
                Anticipated IHE documents
                         DPI User's Handbook 
                Service Components
                         Device Reporting
                         Device Configuration (simple control)
                          "Symmetric" Communication (device as client)
                         External Control
                                  Basic PnP Control
                                  Safety Interlocks
                                   "Simple" non-therapeutic Control
                                  Therapeutic controls
                                  Closed-loop control (incl. QoS requirements / "contract")
                Supervisor
                <Flight Recorder Black Box>
       - <Compare to current 11073 F&O>

=========== END RAW NOTES =====================

Decisions/Issues:

  • The DPI WP should be drafted so as to directly inform the revision of the ISO/IEEE 11073-00000 Framework & Overview standard.
  • The PCD DPI profiles should include support for ICE-compliant systems.

Action(s):

  • (Todd) Publish DPI White Paper outline & process by 2008.10.05
  • (Todd) Coordinate with Dr. Julian Goldman re. the Boston F2F schedule & agenda, and regarding IHE PCD sync with ICE & MDPnP work.
5 Next Meeting
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Discusion topics for upcoming meetings should include:

  • DPI Wireless Architecture
  • White Paper Outline / Content Review (probably 2 sessions, one each week)
  • 4th session topic TBD

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

6 Next Meeting
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

  • Next meeting will be scheduled for Thursday 2008.10.09

Action(s):

Next Meeting

Next meeting scheduled for Thursday, 2008-10-09 @ 10:00 - 11:30 Eastern


<Add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">


PCD Home