Difference between revisions of "PCD Cochairs 2009-12-22 Webex"
m (→Proposed Agenda: correction) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Proposed Agenda == | == Proposed Agenda == | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Agenda was replaced with the items identified in the discussion''' |
:1. Review & Approve Agenda | :1. Review & Approve Agenda | ||
− | :2. Review [[PCD_Cochairs_2009-12- | + | :2. Review [[PCD_Cochairs_2009-12-08_Webex | previous Discussion Summary from 2009.12.08]] |
:3. MEM public comment resolution | :3. MEM public comment resolution | ||
:4. HITSP Cross Reference Table (PDQ, RMON) | :4. HITSP Cross Reference Table (PDQ, RMON) | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
== Attachments / Materials == | == Attachments / Materials == | ||
− | '''The previous meeting was on December 15, 2009, [[PCD Cochairs 2009-12-15 Webex]]''' | + | '''The previous meeting was on December 15, 2009, [[PCD Cochairs 2009-12-15 Webex]]; a quorum was not present. The prior meeting was December 8 [[PCD Cochairs 2009-12-08 Webex]]''' |
See [[PCD Cochair Action Items]] page. | See [[PCD Cochair Action Items]] page. | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
=== Participants === | === Participants === | ||
− | + | ||
− | : Cochairs: Todd Cooper, Steve Merritt, John Rhoads | + | : Cochairs: Todd Cooper, Ken Fuchs, Steve Merritt, John Rhoads |
: Meeting Chaired by: Todd | : Meeting Chaired by: Todd | ||
: Guest: Paul Schluter | : Guest: Paul Schluter | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
| '''Review Meeting Summaries''' <br>- Chair | | '''Review Meeting Summaries''' <br>- Chair | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
− | : ''' | + | : '''Postponed''' |
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
| '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair | | '''Action Items Review''' <br>- Chair | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
+ | '''Action Items Postponed''' | ||
:* 55: Showcase Vendor Display Policy - | :* 55: Showcase Vendor Display Policy - | ||
Line 114: | Line 115: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 4 | | align="center" | 4 | ||
− | | ''' | + | | '''Device – Patient Association''' <br>- All |
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
− | :* | + | :* Should options (specifically, PIB) be considered profiles? Should it be “isolated”? Should there be a higher level representation as shown? John observed that some of the issues relate to Kudu and testing. |
+ | :* Ken observed that the diagram relates to ITI profiles, and when included in PCD these are considered options. | ||
+ | :* Manny asked if PIB might be an option in profiles other than DEC in the future and if PIB is still necessary. Todd responded by saying PIB provides for patient association without requiring full blown PAM or PDQ. | ||
+ | :* Todd indicated a preference for PIB independent of DEC, so that it is available for use in other profiles. Steve asked if it could merely be a transaction. Todd indicated that as a separate profile it can be an element in Device Association Management. Ken observed that PIB provides some flexibility if separate, but that won’t be useful until some future developments in device association take place. | ||
+ | :* Todd will develop a written discussion for further discussion. | ||
+ | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
Line 124: | Line 130: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 5 | | align="center" | 5 | ||
− | | ''' | + | | '''IHE'' <br>- Manny, Todd |
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
− | :* | + | :* Multiple Domain Meetings will take place in Phoenix Feb. 1-4. Lisa asked Todd and Manny to attend ITI, PCC, QRPH, and they will. |
+ | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
Line 135: | Line 142: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 6 | | align="center" | 6 | ||
− | | ''' | + | | '''HITSP TN905''' <br>- Todd, John |
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
− | :* | + | :* Todd led discussion of HITSP TN905, specifically issues related to Figure 5-1, Systems Actors and Interfaces. |
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
Line 144: | Line 151: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 7 | | align="center" | 7 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair | | '''Next Meeting''' <br>- Chair | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
− | + | :* Next meeting will be Jan. 5 | |
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 192: | Line 165: | ||
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | ||
− | [[Category:PCD Meeting]] | + | [[Category:PCD Meeting Archive]] |
Latest revision as of 14:36, 17 May 2010
Patient Care Device Cochairs Weekly Meeting
Date: Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Time: 3:00 pm, Eastern Time
Duration: 60 Minutes
Proposed Agenda
Agenda was replaced with the items identified in the discussion
- 1. Review & Approve Agenda
- 2. Review previous Discussion Summary from 2009.12.08
- 3. MEM public comment resolution
- 4. HITSP Cross Reference Table (PDQ, RMON)
- 5. AAMI Conference 2010
- 6. Recruiting, Other
- - Continua members with regulated devices
- 7. Connectathon Update
- - Continua PCD-01 testing at Connectathon (our responsibility?) and collaboration at Showcase
- o Availability of Continua's requirements for certification to non-members
- - Continua PCD-01 testing at Connectathon (our responsibility?) and collaboration at Showcase
- 8. Showcase Update
- - Need draft of Scenario/Messages/Themes for the four walls
- o Friday 9:30 EST meeting with J Donnelly, Lisa, Elli
- - Desire to emphasize Meaningful Use
- - Recruiting AC and AA vendors
- - Recruiting RTLS vendors
- - Need draft of Scenario/Messages/Themes for the four walls
- 9.
- 10. Funding Status update
- - Federal funding
- - Letter to ACCE
- - Proposal from Jennifer
- - Other opportunities / updates
- 11. HITSP ARRA/HITECH Status Update
- 12. IHE International
- - Incorporation Status
- - IP Management Process
- 13. IHE PCD - Asia, Europe
- 14. New Directions
- - ACM in other domains
- 15. F2F
- - Review Oct. F2F including Action Items
- - Set date and city for Spring F2F
- 16. Additional Business
- 17. Action Items
Attachments / Materials
The previous meeting was on December 15, 2009, PCD Cochairs 2009-12-15 Webex; a quorum was not present. The prior meeting was December 8 PCD Cochairs 2009-12-08 Webex
See PCD Cochair Action Items page.
Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.
Meeting Summary
Participants
- Cochairs: Todd Cooper, Ken Fuchs, Steve Merritt, John Rhoads
- Meeting Chaired by: Todd
- Guest: Paul Schluter
- Technical Project Manager: Manny Furst
Discussion
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Accepted
Action(s):
2 Review Meeting Summaries
- ChairStatus/Discussion: - Postponed
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
3 Action Items Review
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Action Items Postponed
- 55: Showcase Vendor Display Policy -
- 61: Stakeholder survey -
- 74: Clinician recruitment -
- 77: HITSP RMON -
- 78: Continua -
- 82: CIMIT -
- 83: Funding Possibilities -
- 87: Recruiting Vendors -
- 88: Cycle 4 -
- 89: Stakeholder Survey -
- 90: ASTM MOU -
- 91: High-Level Architecture -
- 92: TF Revision -
- 93: V&V & IHE -
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
4 Device – Patient Association
- AllStatus/Discussion: - Should options (specifically, PIB) be considered profiles? Should it be “isolated”? Should there be a higher level representation as shown? John observed that some of the issues relate to Kudu and testing.
- Ken observed that the diagram relates to ITI profiles, and when included in PCD these are considered options.
- Manny asked if PIB might be an option in profiles other than DEC in the future and if PIB is still necessary. Todd responded by saying PIB provides for patient association without requiring full blown PAM or PDQ.
- Todd indicated a preference for PIB independent of DEC, so that it is available for use in other profiles. Steve asked if it could merely be a transaction. Todd indicated that as a separate profile it can be an element in Device Association Management. Ken observed that PIB provides some flexibility if separate, but that won’t be useful until some future developments in device association take place.
- Todd will develop a written discussion for further discussion.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
5 'IHE
- Manny, ToddStatus/Discussion: - Multiple Domain Meetings will take place in Phoenix Feb. 1-4. Lisa asked Todd and Manny to attend ITI, PCC, QRPH, and they will.
Decisions/Issues:Action(s):
6 HITSP TN905
- Todd, JohnStatus/Discussion: - Todd led discussion of HITSP TN905, specifically issues related to Figure 5-1, Systems Actors and Interfaces.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
7 Next Meeting
- ChairStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Next meeting will be Jan. 5
Action(s):
Next Meeting
The next meeting will be January 5, 2010 PCD Cochairs 2010-01-05 Webex
<For Decision Meetings, add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">