PCC Minutes - December 5th
Attending
Audrey Dickerson, Deb Konicek (SNOMED), Rita Scicolon (AHIMA), Marcia, Larry McKnight, Davera Gabriel, Peter Kress, Thom Kuhn, Ann Diamond, Keith Boone
Functional Assessment and Assessment Instrument Content Profile
Use the ~10 categories from CCD to select possible assessment instruments. Allow for muliple assessments from each category (no "preferred" instruments). Keep instruments small, no MDS. Report assessment and values going into assessment. Focus need for assessments on specific use cases.
Clarify last use case. Change one of first two use cases to home health care.
Laboratory Reporting for Public Health
This is perhaps too small in scope for a profile, but need to keep it in our back pocket for HITSP use cases. Use this to help elaborate on the whitepaper. Work this in to 1 or 2 year plan for a profile this year or next.
Work Effort and Profile Selection
| Profile | Complexity | Size | Resources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antepartum Care Summary | Medium | 30 | Larry, Thom |
| Emergency Department Encounter Record | Medium | 30 | Todd, Thom |
| Functional Assessments | Hard | 30 | Davera, Keith |
| Query for Dynamic Clinical Data | Hard | 50+ | Larry, Keith |
| Clinical Trial Clarification | Very Hard | 40 | N/A |
| Lab Public Health Reporting | Hard | 40 | Sarah |
| XDS-MS To CCD | Medium | 10 | Larry, Keith |
We restricted the scope of each profile to simplify it. The Clinical Trial Clarification was not selected this year. It can be input to the white paper, but right now, it could make very good use of standards that we are simply not ready for (more advanced Web Services).
For Lab Public Health Reporting, we see this as a two year project, initially exploring a very restricted use case (e.g., one class of reportable conditions), to feed information into the white paper. We want the option to pull a trigger later in the year if necessary to develop this as a full profile should it become more relevant. We expect that this would be a content profile that could be done in the new directions section next year, or as a full profile if we discover during our research that this can be managed this year.
The four profiles that we believe need to be moved forward are (in alphabetical order):
- Antepartum Care Summary
- Emergency Department Encounter Record
- Functional Assessments
- Query for Dynamic Clinical Data
We plan to discuss moving XDS-MS to be fully compatible with CCD at Connectathon this year. That decision will also depend upon outcome of ballot reconcilliation of CCD.
Calendar
Report results out by Friday this week -- Keith Planning Committee Call 14th or 15th to accept results and discuss next steps -- what profiles to move forward. Review new scope, say yes to which profiles and begin work because we have available resources that are ready to do so.
WebEx on the 18th 10-12CST to show people how to use the Wiki.