NM Image FT Evaluation

NM Image has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Chris Lindop)

Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.

TC Checklist

• Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?

Yes.

• Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?

Yes.

• Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?

Yes.

• Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?

Yes.

• Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?

(Check with Lynn)

PC Checklist

• Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda
  • Consider doing this a couple months before new TF version will be released so it can be incorporated.
  • It's helpful to assign an advocate for the supplement at this time to check/prepare the evidence for the upcoming checklist rather than go hunting for it during the meeting

• Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?

Yes. EU (2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011) NA (2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2011)

• Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?

Yes. NA (2007, 2008)

• Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?

Yes.

• Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?

(Check with Lynn)

• Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?

(Check with Lynn)

• Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?

Yes.

• (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)

(Discuss)

• Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?

(Discuss)

• Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile

No.