ITI Planning - 20180918

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

back ITI Planning Committee 2018/2019 Meetings

Location

To join this meeting

Time 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Monthly on the third Tuesday

Go to https://himss.webex.com/himss/j.php?MTID=me852e7ebefb69e608eea3547ddceeb94

Agenda

  • Agenda review
  • Announcements
  • Deadline for new work items is the 21st
    • One proposal received
      • Upload of the summary of Lisa's item proposal on the wiki
    • Standing CP proposal from Lynn
    • FHIR R4 update soon from John (see below #FHIR update to Release 4)
  • Need to plan webinars for pre-faceToFace meeting for proposer feedback
    • Note these webinars are for the community to inform the proposing individual with questions. Not for evaluation of proposal fitness
    • Unfortunately the week before face-to-face is HL7 meeting.
    • So week before HL7? (John on holiday)
  • MoU between IHE and DirectTrust
  • The wiki page of the co-chair duties (draft word version)
  • Lynn's item proposal: Maintenance of ITI Profiles Published in 2018 and earlier
  • Other item proposals already mentioned: ATNA and maintenance of the documentation with FHIR R4
  • Wiki pages and the roster (Lynn's recent message)

FHIR update to Release 4

Proposal will be submitted by John

Minimally -- Deadline Jan/Feb 2019

  • update MHD, PDQm, mXDE, mCSD
    • Help PCC get QEDm updated (Should ITI take this over?)
  • Resolve outstanding CP
  • update conformance resources
  • New naming convention to replace '.' with '_' per new FHIR requirement

Should

  • Publish using IG publication, so that the result is html publication, source saved in GITHUB, with PDF published too
    • Likely just pick one like MHD to do this

After priority deadline the rest of the profiles will be updated to R4

  • mACM, NPFSm, PIXm, and ATNAm

Potential New Work Items - not proposed

The following is a list of things that have been spoken about, but for which we have not received a formal new work item proposal

  • XDM on FHIR -- usecases from XDM, but where the encoding of the metadata is using FHIR structure
  • MHD asynchronous -- usecases from MHD, but where there is a need for asynchronous. Such as MHD as an API to XCA where the asynchronous MHD would allow for non-blocking
  • ATNA FHIR Audit Client -- (Rob's proposal from last two years). Simply document how a FHIR Client would use AuditEvent to log the same security events as ATNA does today
  • FHIR Client security -- package up the requirements for a FHIR Client to be secure. Subset of ATNA without client side cert + IUA +???
  • SMART-on-FHIR usecases -- authorization of application space, specification of OAuth scope, specification of OAuth interaction (beyond IUA has today)
    • Must deal with SMART-on-FHIR overlap. Is there anything to profile? Can we just reference SMART?
  • FHIR Maturity for MHD and other profiles -- some of the FHIR resources are not being naturally matured, where as IHE may be the best organization to focus on that (e.g. MHD)
    • DocumentReference and DocumentManifest -- need IHE to help them progress through the FMM levels.
    • DocumentManifest needs introduction, scope, etc
    • Both need testing proof etc.
  • MHD On-Demand -- document how MHD would support On-Demand -- where backend is XDS, where backend is XCA, where backend is native FHIR
  • PAM on FHIR -- all of the PAM use-cases in FHIR form
  • Re-Document ITI-18 -- simplify, clarify, various items Thing ONE
  • Re-Document MU -- now that we have RMU, what would MU look like if we re-started today? Might it be a standalone profile rather than options on XDS? Might it be updates to RMU?
  • Work more closely with PCC and QRPH to align their newest work with ITI
  • Work toward a more continuous release structure vs the yearly schedule we now have
  • Profiling of CDS-hooks for specific clinical usecases. Or does this become a clinical domain responsibility (PCC, etc)
  • Provider Directory maturity
    • Alignment with Argonaut
    • Alignment with Sequoia Directory
    • Alignment with DirectTrust.org Directory
  • Overall alignment of our FHIR profiles with Argonaut and/or Da Vinci

Minutes