Difference between revisions of "ITI Planning - 20180821"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:
  
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
−
 
+
* John chaired
−
 
+
* Agenda review
−
* Retrospective
+
** comment to focus on outreach
−
** Good
+
* Reminder to vote
−
*** Hero came to rescue in two cases
+
* Celebrate release of new work items
−
*** Editors brought in SME to help out with the technical details and esoteric need
+
** Retrospective
−
*** succeeded to publish work items within cycle
+
*** Good
−
** Bad
+
**** Hero came to rescue in two cases
−
*** needed hero -- too much unanticipated turnover of people
+
**** Editors brought in SME to help out with the technical details and esoteric need
−
*** Some work items reset -- difficult questions were deferred but that tended to be problem
+
**** succeeded to publish work items within cycle
−
**** reset often, and late
+
*** Bad
−
*** too little improvement of text happened between face-to-face
+
**** needed hero -- too much unanticipated turnover of people
−
*** too little research was done between Planning acceptance (october -> november)
+
**** Some work items reset -- difficult questions were deferred but that tended to be problem
−
*** expertise needed to review work items was very deep and specialized
+
***** reset often, and late
−
*** face-to-face scheduled personal holiday
+
**** too little improvement of text happened between face-to-face
−
*** Oslo meeting decisions were not well (Effectively) published
+
**** too little research was done between Planning acceptance (october -> november)
−
** Improvements
+
**** expertise needed to review work items was very deep and specialized
−
*** Editors should be required to have been an active committee member for at-least a year
+
**** face-to-face scheduled personal holiday
−
*** more use of strawman solutioning
+
**** Oslo meeting decisions were not well (Effectively) published
−
*** more between face-to-face tcon work
+
*** Improvements
−
*** project proposal needs to include a realistic project plan
+
**** Editors should be required to have been an active committee member for at-least a year
−
*** primary and secondary editors should be assigned
+
**** more use of strawman solutioning
−
*** Is there a way to reset the plan midway when scope changes?
+
**** more between face-to-face tcon work
 +
**** project proposal needs to include a realistic project plan
 +
**** primary and secondary editors should be assigned
 +
**** Is there a way to reset the plan midway when scope changes?
 +
** News articles
 +
*** John to provide blog as possible news article on Metadata handbook
 +
*** Charles to write raw material for an AS4 article -- DEADLINE September 10
 +
* Status of new proposals
 +
** None yet received
 +
** Lisa asks for process
 +
*** see https://healthcaresecprivacy.blogspot.com/2018/08/open-call-for-ihe-work-item-proposals.html
 +
* Webinar
 +
** Daniel is giving an ITI overview on the 29th
 +
*** Slides should be reviewed next week
 +
** John agrees to split up the xds-on-fhir slide deck into three
 +
*** ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/ITI_EducationalMaterials/CurrentPublished/XDSonFHIR-MHD+mXDE+QEDm-20180615.pptx
 +
*** Document Sharing overview
 +
*** MHD
 +
*** mXDE (MHD + QEDm)
 +
** Charles agrees to create an AS4 webinar (10 minutes)
 +
*** September 10 or 11 at 10am central time
 +
** ACTION: John to get these webinars planned
 +
* FHIR Release 4
 +
** ACTION: John to write up proposal for new work to align early in the year
 +
* Discussion of new governance cycle proposal

Revision as of 12:59, 21 August 2018

back ITI Planning Committee 2017/2018 Meetings

Location

To join this meeting

Time 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Monthly on the third Tuesday 

Go to https://himss.webex.com/himss/j.php?MTID=me852e7ebefb69e608eea3547ddceeb94

Agenda

Minutes

  • John chaired
  • Agenda review
    • comment to focus on outreach
  • Reminder to vote
  • Celebrate release of new work items
    • Retrospective
      • Good
        • Hero came to rescue in two cases
        • Editors brought in SME to help out with the technical details and esoteric need
        • succeeded to publish work items within cycle
      • Bad
        • needed hero -- too much unanticipated turnover of people
        • Some work items reset -- difficult questions were deferred but that tended to be problem
          • reset often, and late
        • too little improvement of text happened between face-to-face
        • too little research was done between Planning acceptance (october -> november)
        • expertise needed to review work items was very deep and specialized
        • face-to-face scheduled personal holiday
        • Oslo meeting decisions were not well (Effectively) published
      • Improvements
        • Editors should be required to have been an active committee member for at-least a year
        • more use of strawman solutioning
        • more between face-to-face tcon work
        • project proposal needs to include a realistic project plan
        • primary and secondary editors should be assigned
        • Is there a way to reset the plan midway when scope changes?
    • News articles
      • John to provide blog as possible news article on Metadata handbook
      • Charles to write raw material for an AS4 article -- DEADLINE September 10
  • Status of new proposals
  • Webinar
  • FHIR Release 4
    • ACTION: John to write up proposal for new work to align early in the year
  • Discussion of new governance cycle proposal
Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=ITI_Planning_-_20180821&oldid=111026"