Difference between revisions of "ITI Change Proposals 2018-19"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 275: Line 275:
  
 
== March 14, 2018  ==
 
== March 14, 2018  ==
 
'''Time:''' 10:00 - 11:00 CDT
 
 
'''Webex link:''' https://himss.webex.com/himss/j.php?MTID=m0c4797d303b0ef85bc37ae2f1e30ee61
 
 
'''Meeting:'''  926 847 156
 
 
'''Password:''' Meeting1
 
 
'''Attendees:'''
 
 
'''The ITI CP tracking spreadsheet''' is [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gdr_Y8xZBvbb326J4z67cqprxOexFgtkPj_VlD3rB9E/edit#gid=0 here].
 
'''(1) Incoming CPs''' ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/0_Incoming/
 
* CP-ITI-Fix ITI 53 audit...docx - reviewed and approved as Completed '''CP-ITI-1164''' for future ballot 52 (April)
 
* CP-ITI-LF-PLTupdates.doc - accepted as '''CP-ITI-1165''', but not assigned to anyone at this time.  There is no 'owner' of the Patient Location Tracking profile, which has companies registered to test it, for the first time, at the Rennes Connectathon.  Lynn will talk to the implementors of PLT at the Connectathon to find out if they find it useful, and perhaps we can find an owner for this CP.
 
 
'''(2) Tarik's topics'''
 
* The following was discussed and will become '''CP-ITI-1166''', assigned to Tarik: 
 
IUA references RFC 6750. This never made much sense to me. What would the alternative to the Bearer transport of the OAuth2 Token be? I now have a hunch that this was supposed to be RFC 7522 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7522) instead. The option makes more sense if it allows interoperability between XUA and IUA by allowing clients to get a OAuth Access Code using a SAML Bearer Token.
 
* The following was discussed and will become '''CP-ITI-1167''', assigned to Tarik: 
 
The topic came up in german national specifications using IHE XDS whether MTOM/XOP has to be used for all ITI-41 and ITI-43 transactions or whether the client decides. Vol2b states in 3.41.4.1.2 that "The Provide and Register Document Set-b Response message shall use SOAP 1.2 and MTOM with XOP encoding (labeled MTOM/XOP in this specification). Implementors of this transaction shall comply with all requirements described in: ITI TF-2x: Appendix V: Web Services for IHE Transactions." Vol2x Appendix V.3.6 states "Actors that create messages with xsi:base64Binary content may use XOP Optimization to reduce the size of the message. If there are multiple xsi:base64Binary content elements, the actor may optimize none, any or all of them at its discretion. Typically, small content will be left in the XML Infoset while larger content will be "optimized". 
 
ITI-43 also requires use of MTOM and XOP, but then includes an example without it, using the following explanation: "A second form of the response is possible, an un-optimized MTOM/XOP message. In this form the message is still formatted as a multipart but the document contents is not split out into a separate part of the multipart. Some popular Web Service toolkits generate this form for very small documents. The same response in this form looks like..." (3.43.5.1.2.1)
 
There should be clear guidance whether the MTOM and XOP must be used in ITI-41 and -43.
 
 
'''(3) Next in CPs'''
 
* Reminder:  If you want a CP to be integrated into TF docs in June, then the CP should be reviewed and completed in March so it can be balloted in April.  There are openings on the Mar 21 and 28 agenda for Assigned CPs ready for review.
 
  
 
== March 21, 2018 ==
 
== March 21, 2018 ==

Revision as of 10:58, 14 March 2019

This page contains the details of Change Proposal (CP) processing in the ITI domain for the 2018-19 publication cycle.

The ITI Change Proposal process follows the general IHE CP process described on the Change Proposal process page. The following sections give more detail on the process for folks involved in the CP process in the ITI domain.

The ITI-specific CP Process

The following text explains what the process used by the ITI technical committee in processing submitted CPs. It is consistent with the general IHE CP process and is informative only.

  1. Write a change proposal. Here is IHE's Change Proposal Template
  2. Submit into the Incoming directory. This is typically done by directly updating the directory if you have access; otherwise send it an email to the ITI Technical Committee members in charge of CPs (currently Lynn Felhofer).
  3. The new CPs are considered by the committee at periodic CP review calls. If CP is accepted it is given a CP #, assigned an editor, renamed to CP-ITI-xxx-00.doc and placed in Assigned. If CP is rejected it is moved to Rejected and submitter is informed of explanation for rejection. Likely reasons for rejection are: duplicate, merged, withdrawn or not enough information to understand the request. Rejected CPs can be resubmitted with more information for reconsideration.
  4. Committee works with editor to draft the CP. Versions are kept in Assigned directory and numbered -00, -01, -02, etc.
  5. Committee decides CP is ready for ballot. Latest version of CP is moved to Completed diretory and old versions are moved to old_versions.
  6. Co-chair collects Completed CPs into a ballot. The Ballot directory will be used for this.
  7. Ballot is released to the general community for voting for 4 weeks
  8. Votes and comments are collected. All yes votes means the CP passed ballot and moved to FinalText. No votes are resolved by the committee. Sometimes CP is withdrawn, sometimes NO voter changes to yes vote after explanations. CP may be updated in this process. If updates are insignificant (clarification only) the CP is considered passed. If updates are significant the CP is submitted for another ballot.
  9. CP approved in ballot are put in FinalText and scheduled to be integrated into the Technical Framework or Supplement.
  10. CP status and ballots are tracked here

Change Proposal pages from previous years

Ongoing work on CPs is placed on the current year CP page. Prior years work can be accessed at:

ITI CP Tracking

Location of CPs

All Change Proposal management is done on the IHE ftp site here.

As CPs are processed through various statuses they move from one directory to another. The directories involved are:

Incoming
contains CPs which have been submitted but have not been assigned a CP number or an editor. This is the place that new incoming CPs are placed prior to the first stage of processing by the committee.
Assigned
contains CPs that have been assigned an editor and are being actively worked on by the committee, i.e. Assigned status
Completed
contains the last version of a CP that is in Completed status. Its contents are approved by the Technical Committee and the CP is waiting to be put in a ballot.
FinalText
contains the last version of a CP that is in FinalText status. It is has been approved by ballot and is waiting to be integrated into the TF in the upcoming publication cycle.
Integrated
contains the version of the CP that was integrated into the TF, organized by year.
Rejected
CPs that have been submitted but rejected by the committee
Cancelled
contains CPs that were once assigned but have been cancelled, i.e. Cancelled status
Ballots
contains Ballots that have been released for voting by the general community, organized by year.

CP status

ITI tracks status of its Change Proposals in this google doc: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gdr_Y8xZBvbb326J4z67cqprxOexFgtkPj_VlD3rB9E/edit?usp=sharing The Active CPs tab contains those that are Assigned, Completed, or Final Text in this cycle. There are also archive tabs for prior years.

Approved CPs integrated into the ITI Technical Framework

CPs that have passed ballot in since 2015, and that have been, or will be, integrated into the ITI Technical Framework are listed on the "Approved CPs" tab of the tracking spreadsheet.

CPs that have already been integrated into the Technical Framework are stored here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/4_Integrated/

In Aug 2018, CPs will be integrated & checked following this process : ITI CP Integration Process

Ballots

Ballot 48

Out for ballot: June 8 - July 9, 2018. Comments/votes resolved on the July 12, 2018 CP review call.

Ballot 48 CPs are here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/Ballots/2019/Ballot_48/

Comments, votes & resolution are here


CP-ITI Title Ballot Result
1094-08 ATNA - Add Option: Require server certificate domain name validation for all traffic over the public internet Failed ballot; will be reballoted in Ballot 49
1124-09 ATNA – Add two options related to BCP195 TLS Secure Transport Connection Failed ballot; will be reballoted in Ballot 49


Ballot 49

Out for ballot: Aug 10 - Sep 10, 2018. Comments/votes were resolved on the Sep 13, 2018 CP review call.

Ballot 49 CPs are here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/Ballots/2019/Ballot_49/

Comments, votes & resolution are here.

CPs approved in this ballot are Final Text and are stored here until they are incorporated in 2019: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/3_FinalText/

CP-ITI Title Ballot Result
697-02 PIXv3 Query Result Approved w/ updates; pending confirmation of update by Change HC
1094-10 ATNA - Add Option: Require server certificate domain name validation for all traffic over the public internet Approved w/ updates. This CP is cancelled, but approved text is now in CP-ITI-1145; see below.
1124-12 ATNA – Add two options related to BCP195 TLS Secure Transport Connection Approved w/ updates. This CP is cancelled, but approved text is now in CP-ITI-1145; see below.
1122-08 Redocumentation of Appendix V on SOAP Web Services Approved w/ updates; Vol 2x Rev 15.1 republished in Oct 2018 with this CP
1123-04 Redocumentation of Appendix V – HL7 V3 Sections Approved w/ updates; Vol 2x Rev 15.1 republished in Oct 2018 with this CP
1145-01 ATNA – Add three options affecting ITI-19 Approved. Includes text with resolved comments from CP 1094 and 1124 above


Ballot 50

Out for ballot: Sep 25 - Oct 24, 2018. Comments/votes resolved on the Oct 25, 2018 CP review call.

Ballot 50 CPs are here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/Ballots/2019/Ballot_50/

Comments, votes & resolution are here.

CPs approved in this ballot are Final Text and are stored here until they are incorporated in 2019: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/3_FinalText/

CP-ITI Title Ballot Result
1051-01 Align BPPC Vol 1 with convention for Content Profiles & Grouping Failed ballot; needs to be addressed more broadly; back to Assigned
1134-00 Author Person Required Approved
1135-01 SAML – multiple levels of nesting must be supported Approved w/ updates.
1137-00 healthCareFacilityTypeCode example fix in ITI-18 Approved
1138-01 Update Form Receiver and Form Processor Role Definition in ITI-35 Approved
1139-00 NPFSm – wrong actor in message semantics Approved
1140-00 ITI TF-1 reference to background material is out of date Cancelled. Updated links in the TF to ihe.net now have redirects. This change is not needed.
1141-00 XCF – example is inconsistent with list of attributes
1142-00 Remove extra spaces in attribute values in ITI-43 Approved
1143-01 DEN: update to formatCode was done on pre-redoc Vol 3 content Approved w/ update.
1144-01 Reference in Vol 3 is circular rather than helpful Approved w/ updates.
1146-00 DSUB - Correct SubmissionSet Suscription Filter Text
1147-00 Out-of-date DICOM reference in ITI-19 Approved


Ballot 51

Out for ballot: Jan 22 - Feb 19, 2019. Comments/votes resolved on the March 7, 2019 CP review call.

Ballot 51 CPs are here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/Ballots/2019/Ballot_51/

Comments, votes & resolution are here.

CPs approved in this ballot are Final Text and will be stored here until they are incorporated in 2019: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/3_FinalText/

CP-ITI Title Ballot Result
693-03 Allow “addAttachment” as an Event Type in XDW Approved w/ updates
978-03 MHD Documents encoding in XDW task output/input Failed ballot. This CP is now Cancelled
1054-02 XDW : Datatype fix and update diagram Approved; rationale updated.
1086-04 Clarify Max Length for CX Datatype Approved w/ updates
1125-01 Fix documentEntry.referenceIdList Approved
1148-00 IUA - define JWT token structure Approved
1154-00 Editorial: Fix section numbers in AS4 TI Supplement Approved
1157-02 Add Link to RAD TF - Best Practice for the Grouping of PDI with XDM Approved
1158-00 BPPC editorial fixes Approved


Assigned CPs

For a list of CPs that are currently assigned see the 'Active CPs' tab in the CP status google doc.

Assigned CPs are stored here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/1_Assigned/

Strategies for smarter CP processing (from Jul-17 F2F)

We often have CPs that need a lot of rework after ballot:

  • There is not enough review prior to ballot
  • Perhaps too much effort on specificity vs remaining silent
  • Look for opportunities to suggest that a small subset take a time-consuming or editorial problem offline and come back to the group with an updated change.

Gateway questions prior to accepting a CP (or finishing work on an existing CP):

  • Is solving the problem necessary for interoperability?
  • Has an implementer reported this problem, or should they, or... is this theoretical?
  • Is the text inconsistent? If so, are we over-specifying, i.e. can we delete the inconsistency?
  • Strongly suggest that a submitter propose a solution.
  • Is this a problem that needs to be fixed?

Upcoming CP discussions

ITI CP review calls are typically held every Thursday from 10-11am Central US. Additional sessions may be scheduled during ITI Tech F2F meetings. Changes to the 'traditional' schedule for CP calls are announced on the ititech email list.

The Google Doc used to gather availability of ITI Tech Members and the focus of future CP calls is here.

March 14, 2018

March 21, 2018

Time: 10:00 - 11:00 CDT

Webex link: https://himss.webex.com/himss/j.php?MTID=m0c4797d303b0ef85bc37ae2f1e30ee61

Meeting: 926 847 156

Password: Meeting1

Attendees:

The ITI CP tracking spreadsheet is here.

(1) Assigned CPs for Review ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/1_Assigned/

  • CP-ITI-1130 - Updates to Async option in existing TF to align with AS4 TI Supplement (Charles)
  • more tbd

(2) Incoming CPs ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/0_Incoming/

  • tbd

(3) Next in CPs

  • x

Minutes from past CP calls

See ITI CPs 2018-19-Agenda and Minutes from past CP calls