ITI CPs 2013-12-19

ITI domain CPs for 2013-2014 are managed here: http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=ITI_Change_Proposals_2014

This page contains the agenda and minutes for the Dec 19, 2013 meeting.

Dec-19-2013

9-11am Central US

Agenda

(1) Upcoming schedule: There will be no CP call on Jan 2. Our next call is Jan 16.

(2) Assigned CPs ready for review: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/1_Assigned/

• CP-ITI-731-00 (Elliott L) DICOM Audit Differences
• CP-ITI-732-01 (Elliott L) Update to Doc Relationship example
• CP-ITI-586-01 (Elliott L) MU typo
• CP-ITI-720-01 and pptx (Bill) Clarify Replacement for addendum and transformation docs
  • proposal to reassign from John to Bill: I (John) was involved in the email discussion, but in my case I added confusion to the email discussion bringing up the Appendix in Volume 1 that makes this even more confused. I would tend to agree with Gil that a replace on the addendum or transform should only affect those and not the parent. I just don’t have a clue if this is what Bill would agree is current fact. This item really needs to be owned by Bill.
• CP-ITI-721 - Clarify associations in different submission sets -
  • request to reassign from John M: I am not the expert here. I think the example is intended to provide an example of a submissionSet where just an association is included. The note on document-signature it isn’t a perfect example of a submissionSet that contains only an association. It is an example of a submissionSet holding a document (signature document) with an association to a document (signed document) from a different submissionSet. I can’t think of a ‘good’ example of a submissionSet with just an association. Most of the time one is submitting a new document with an association. If the point of the CP is that because the note is not a perfect example that it should be removed as an imperfect example, then I guess I don’t see the harm in removing it.
• CP-ITI-722 - Update explanation of relating a documentEntry to a Folder -
  • request to reassign from John M to Bill, Karen, Vassil or other
• CP-ITI-638-01 (Karen) Async Supplement update to Appendix V -
  • this CP is actually 'final text' but was never balloted or integrated. Need to determine whether ballot is needed, or can this just be integrated in 2014.
• CP-ITI-711 - (Karen) Add limitedMetadata attribute to optionality table -
  • from Karen: while I like the addition you made, I’m concerned that there is another category. For homeCommunityId the Registry is not REQUIRED to ignore the value, and is free to do something with it if it would like, but none is specified in the transaction. Not sure if we should add another category for “may ignore” or weaken the “I” or what.
• CP-ITI-712 - (Karen) Clarify “optional” metadata on “submission” -
  • from Karen: the limitedMetadata tag is an on/off tag, not a contents tag. If it is specified this means there is limited Metadata in the transaction. This makes it required as you have specified but NOT ALLOWED on all other transactions, since they are not allowed to carry limited metadata. Exception is XDM where it truly would be optional. We don’t have a NOT ALLOWED category so this also should be discussed.
• CP-ITI-655-04 - (Marek / Mark S) Modify field predicate logic for conditional fields PID-29, 30 Patient Death of IHE PAM
• CP-ITI-698 - (Rob) Fix URN Instructions
• CP-ITI-299 - (Rob) Fix 3881 references

(3) Discuss email comments on 2 completed CPs: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/2_Completed/

• CP-ITI-708 (Vassil's) Update Appendix V with current versions of WS-I profiles
• CP-ITI-709 (John M's) Accounting of Disclosures audit message

(4) CP Ballot 20 planning:

• Currently completed CPs are here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/2_Completed/
• Timeline PROPOSAL:
  • mm/dd/yyyy -- ballot content & spreadsheet sent to IHE USA staff (Lynn)
  • mm/dd/yyyy -- ballot sent to ITI Tech email list (Nancy)
  • mm/dd/yyyy -- ballot comments due (ITI Tech)
  • mm/dd/yyyy -- ballot comments consolidated (Lynn)
  • mm/dd/yyyy -- CP call for ballot 20 review (ITI Tech)

(5) Incoming CP review: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/0_Incoming/

• bill-vol1-doc-src.doc
• bill-vol1-folders.doc
• CP-ITI-BPPCtypecode.doc
• CP-ITI-CSD-CL_default_namespaces.doc
• CP-ITI-CSD_CL-inconsistent_soap.doc
• CP-ITI-HV_otherID_parameter_description.doc
• CP-ITI-ES-Add referenceId attribute optionality.doc
• CP-ITI-ES-Clarify query attribute optionality-RESUBMITTED.doc
• CP-ITI-formatCode.doc
• CP-ITI-typeCodeVSclassCode.doc

(6) Old CPs - Motion to cancel these assigned CPs

• CP-ITI-496 (John M) - ATNA secure communications option
  • I am unsure that this is still wanted. It is also a very radical change that would affect “IHE Integration Statements”, be even worse for Gazelle. Given that this is many years old. I think it might be best to cancel it and see if it comes back up again. Reality is that today this is happening through non-stated means. Not a great idea, but reality. I think a solution that would be more accepted would be to write a new profile that was just the audit logging. I would rather see that submitted as a profile proposal. It might be one as small as CT. But it would likely get to what people want (audit without mandatory secure-communications). – Motion to cancel
• CP-ITI-514 (John M) - Correct conflict in node authentication requirements
  • I think we solved this a long time ago with other broad ATNA rewrites. I certainly don’t think I could track down the meaning of the comments in the CP document. – Motion to cancel
• CP-ITI-581 (John M) - Correct DSUB audit messages
  • this seems to want us to take the current ITI-18 audit log messages and make them DSUB. But DSUB is not the same thing as ITI-18. I think the current DSUB audit messages are appropriate, and would not agree with the CP. Motion to cancel.

Minutes

The updated status spreadsheet is here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/Status/

(1) Upcoming schedule: There will be no CP call on Jan 2. Our next call is Jan 16.

(2) These Assigned CPs were discussed

• CP-ITI-731-00 (Elliott L) DICOM Audit Differences - approved for ballot 20
• CP-ITI-732-01 (Elliott L) Update to Doc Relationship example - propose to merge contents w/ 720
• CP-ITI-586-01 (Elliott L) MU typo - approved for ballot 20
• CP-ITI-720-01 (Bill) Clarify Replacement for addendum and transformation docs - discussed with Bill - committee gave guidance for future work
• CP-ITI-721 - Clarify associations in different submission sets - reassigned from john to bill
• CP-ITI-722 - Update explanation of relating a documentEntry to a Folder - reassigned from john to bill
• CP-ITI-638-01 (Karen) Async Supplement update to Appendix V - approved for ballot 20
• CP-ITI-711 - (Karen) Add limitedMetadata attribute to optionality table - discussed and Karen got guidance on moving forward
• CP-ITI-712 - (Karen) Clarify “optional” metadata on “submission” - discussed and Karen got guidance on moving forward
• CP-ITI-655-04 - (Marek / Mark S) Modify field predicate logic for conditional fields PID-29, 30 Patient Death of IHE PAM - discussion of this CP deferred to Jan 16 in favor of CPs owned by attendees on the call
• CP-ITI-698 - (Rob) Fix URN Instructions - John's incoming formatCode CP will be integrated/merged into this one
• CP-ITI-699 - (Rob) Fix 3881 references - ran out of time to discuss this one; deferred to Jan 16

(3) Discuss email comments on 2 completed CPs:

• CP-ITI-708 (Vassil's) Update Appendix V with current versions of WS-I profiles - will be in ballot 20
• CP-ITI-709 (John M's) Accounting of Disclosures audit message - enough issues were raised during email review; move back to assigned

(4) CP Ballot 20 planning:

• Currently completed CPs are here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance-2014/CPs/2_Completed/
• This is the timeline:
  • before 12/27/2014 -- ballot contents & spreadsheet sent to IHE USA staff (Lynn)
  • 01/07/2014 -- ballot sent to ITI Tech email list (Nancy)
  • 02/07/2014 -- ballot comments due (ITI Tech)
  • 02/11/2014 -- ballot comments consolidated (Lynn)
  • potential cmte look @ ballot comments during Vienna F2F the week of Feb 10
  • 02/16/2014 -- CP call for ballot 20 comment review (ITI Tech)

(5a) These incoming CPs were reviewed:

• CP-ITI-BPPCtypecode.doc - 736 - Completed - for ballot 20
• CP-ITI-CSD-CL_default_namespaces.doc - 733 - editorial updates needed before inclusion in ballot 20
• CP-ITI-CSD_CL-inconsistent_soap.doc - 734 - editorial updates needed before inclusion in ballot 20
• CP-ITI-HV_otherID_parameter_description.doc - 735 - editorial updates needed before inclusion in ballot 20
• CP-ITI-formatCode.doc - contents of this CP will be merged into 698
• CP-ITI-typeCodeVSclassCode.doc - 737 - Completed - for ballot 20

(5a) These incoming CPs were deferred to Jan 16 due to lack of time:

• CP-ITI-ES-Add referenceId attribute optionality.doc
• CP-ITI-ES-Clarify query attribute optionality-RESUBMITTED.doc
• bill-vol1-doc-src.doc
• bill-vol1-folders.doc

(6) This topic deferred to Jan 16 due to lack of time: Old CPs - Motion to cancel these assigned CPs

• CP-ITI-496 (John M) - ATNA secure communications option
• CP-ITI-514 (John M) - Correct conflict in node authentication requirements