Difference between revisions of "IHE Testing and Tools Committee Teleconference Minutes 2008-05-12"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Attendees== * Chris Carr, RSNA * Didi Davis, HIMSS * Bill Majurski, NIST * Joan McMillen, RSNA * Steve Moore, MIR ==Minutes==)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
 +
 +
===Contributor Agreements===
 +
* Reviewed version prepared by Steve Moore with change notation to show divergence from base Apache 2.0 contributions
 +
** Substantive difference is elimination of clause about contributions of third-party software; clause is unnecessary because any addition of third-party software to the project code will be made by the Technical Management Group and not other contributors
 +
* Is it necessary to have separate agreement documents for entities and corporations? Possible to eliminate entities agreement?
 +
* '''Action: Committee members''' will consult their organizations about whether separate agreements are necessary
 +
* Final versions of agreements will be clean documents, but will point to marked up version of Apache 2.0 license for reference
 +
* '''Action: Committee''' to develop package for Board approval on June 12 tcon to include license and contributor agreements with rationale for selection
 +
 +
===Process for Software Contributions===
 +
* Steve and Eric developing document to describe procedures for checking in and approving code
 +
* Two models: Moderated check-in where all code is scrutinized before becoming part of base vs. enabling trusted contributors to check-in on their own
 +
* Action: Steve and Eric will submit draft for review on May 19 Testing and Tools Committee Tcon
 +
 +
===Tools inventory===
 +
* Reviewed

Revision as of 18:58, 12 May 2008

Attendees

  • Chris Carr, RSNA
  • Didi Davis, HIMSS
  • Bill Majurski, NIST
  • Joan McMillen, RSNA
  • Steve Moore, MIR

Minutes

Contributor Agreements

  • Reviewed version prepared by Steve Moore with change notation to show divergence from base Apache 2.0 contributions
    • Substantive difference is elimination of clause about contributions of third-party software; clause is unnecessary because any addition of third-party software to the project code will be made by the Technical Management Group and not other contributors
  • Is it necessary to have separate agreement documents for entities and corporations? Possible to eliminate entities agreement?
  • Action: Committee members will consult their organizations about whether separate agreements are necessary
  • Final versions of agreements will be clean documents, but will point to marked up version of Apache 2.0 license for reference
  • Action: Committee to develop package for Board approval on June 12 tcon to include license and contributor agreements with rationale for selection

Process for Software Contributions

  • Steve and Eric developing document to describe procedures for checking in and approving code
  • Two models: Moderated check-in where all code is scrutinized before becoming part of base vs. enabling trusted contributors to check-in on their own
  • Action: Steve and Eric will submit draft for review on May 19 Testing and Tools Committee Tcon

Tools inventory

  • Reviewed