IHE Testing and Tools Committee Teleconference Minutes 2008-04-21

Attendees

• Geert Claeys - Agfa
• Cor Loef - Philips
• David Monteau - INRIA
• Steve Moore - MIR
• Chris Carr - RSNA
• Didi Davis - HIMSS
• Joan McMillen - RSNA

Agenda

Licensing Terms for Gazelle Project

1. Apache 2.0 or Eclipse License?

• Considered differences between two licenses:
  • Apache 2.0 is more "permissive" in the sense that it poses minimal restrictions on redistribution and distribution of derivative works: Requires attribution only
  • Eclipse license is more restrictive (or "viral") in that it requires all derivative versions ("additions" and "modifications") to be released under the same Eclipse license
    • Eclipse does make allowance for "modules" that are distinct from "the Program" and that can be release under separate licensing terms
    • Would introduce the problem of sorting out what contributions were the Program vs modules: Everything on INRIA forge constitutes the Program?
  • Even the "attribution only" model might prevent some contributors from putting their code on the forge (eg, NIST)
  • Difficult to determine whether additional restrictions of Eclipse license would pose an obstacle to contributors, but this does seem possible
• Voted on the current committee members' preference between the two proposed licenses:
  • Apache 2.0 was the preferred license selected (Apache 2.0: 2 votes; Eclipse: 1 vote; 3 abstentions)
  • Action: Chris will announce outcome to the committee list and invite any objections/alternatives before moving forward with contributor agreements, etc. based on the license

Contributor's Agreement

David Monteau's draft agreements for:

1. Corporate Contributors
2. Other Entities
3. Individuals

Topics for Next Call

1. April 28, 8:30 am CDT