Difference between revisions of "IHE Testing and Tools Committee Teleconference Minutes 2008-04-21"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
===Licensing Terms for Gazelle Project===
 
===Licensing Terms for Gazelle Project===
 
# [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php Apache 2.0] or [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/eclipse-1.0.php Eclipse] License?
 
# [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php Apache 2.0] or [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/eclipse-1.0.php Eclipse] License?
 +
* Considered differences between two licenses:
 +
** Apache 2.0 is more "permissive" in the sense that it poses minimal restrictions on redistribution and distribution of derivative works: Requires attribution only
 +
** Eclipse license is more restrictive (or "viral") in that it requires all derivative versions ("additions" and "modifications") to be released under the same Eclipse license
 +
*** Eclipse does make allowance for "modules" that are distinct from "the Program" and that can be release under separate licensing terms
 +
*** Would introduce the problem of sorting out what contributions were the Program vs modules: Everything on INRIA forge constitutes the Program?
  
 
===Contributor's Agreement===
 
===Contributor's Agreement===

Revision as of 10:09, 21 April 2008

Attendees

  • Geert Claeys - Agfa
  • Cor Loef - Philips
  • David Monteau - INRIA
  • Steve Moore - MIR
  • Chris Carr - RSNA
  • Didi Davis - HIMSS
  • Joan McMillen - RSNA

Agenda

Licensing Terms for Gazelle Project

  1. Apache 2.0 or Eclipse License?
  • Considered differences between two licenses:
    • Apache 2.0 is more "permissive" in the sense that it poses minimal restrictions on redistribution and distribution of derivative works: Requires attribution only
    • Eclipse license is more restrictive (or "viral") in that it requires all derivative versions ("additions" and "modifications") to be released under the same Eclipse license
      • Eclipse does make allowance for "modules" that are distinct from "the Program" and that can be release under separate licensing terms
      • Would introduce the problem of sorting out what contributions were the Program vs modules: Everything on INRIA forge constitutes the Program?

Contributor's Agreement

David Monteau's draft agreements for:

  1. Corporate Contributors
  2. Other Entities
  3. Individuals

Committee Governance

Membership Application

Inventory of Tools

Topics for Next Call

  1. April 28, 8:30 am CDT