Difference between revisions of "IHE Testing and Tools Committee Teleconference Minutes 2008-04-21"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===Licensing Terms for Gazelle Project=== | ===Licensing Terms for Gazelle Project=== | ||
# [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php Apache 2.0] or [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/eclipse-1.0.php Eclipse] License? | # [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php Apache 2.0] or [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/eclipse-1.0.php Eclipse] License? | ||
+ | * Considered differences between two licenses: | ||
+ | ** Apache 2.0 is more "permissive" in the sense that it poses minimal restrictions on redistribution and distribution of derivative works: Requires attribution only | ||
+ | ** Eclipse license is more restrictive (or "viral") in that it requires all derivative versions ("additions" and "modifications") to be released under the same Eclipse license | ||
+ | *** Eclipse does make allowance for "modules" that are distinct from "the Program" and that can be release under separate licensing terms | ||
+ | *** Would introduce the problem of sorting out what contributions were the Program vs modules: Everything on INRIA forge constitutes the Program? | ||
===Contributor's Agreement=== | ===Contributor's Agreement=== |
Revision as of 10:09, 21 April 2008
Attendees
- Geert Claeys - Agfa
- Cor Loef - Philips
- David Monteau - INRIA
- Steve Moore - MIR
- Chris Carr - RSNA
- Didi Davis - HIMSS
- Joan McMillen - RSNA
Agenda
Licensing Terms for Gazelle Project
- Apache 2.0 or Eclipse License?
- Considered differences between two licenses:
- Apache 2.0 is more "permissive" in the sense that it poses minimal restrictions on redistribution and distribution of derivative works: Requires attribution only
- Eclipse license is more restrictive (or "viral") in that it requires all derivative versions ("additions" and "modifications") to be released under the same Eclipse license
- Eclipse does make allowance for "modules" that are distinct from "the Program" and that can be release under separate licensing terms
- Would introduce the problem of sorting out what contributions were the Program vs modules: Everything on INRIA forge constitutes the Program?
Contributor's Agreement
David Monteau's draft agreements for:
Committee Governance
Membership Application
Inventory of Tools
Topics for Next Call
- April 28, 8:30 am CDT