Difference between revisions of "IHE Testing and Tools Committee 2009-11-09 Teleconference Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* Discussed proposal for restructuring management of Gazelle project presented by Charles Parisot | * Discussed proposal for restructuring management of Gazelle project presented by Charles Parisot | ||
| − | :* Currently development of Gazelle is a joint project led by the Connectathon Managers | + | :* Currently development of Gazelle is a joint project led by the Connectathon Managers, Eric Poiseau/INRIA and Steve Moore/MIR |
:* Connectathon testing has been successful, but absorbs labor resources of Connectathon Manangers, leaving relatively little for tools development | :* Connectathon testing has been successful, but absorbs labor resources of Connectathon Manangers, leaving relatively little for tools development | ||
:* Demand for testing services is emerging in a number of national projects worldwide | :* Demand for testing services is emerging in a number of national projects worldwide | ||
:* Some may have financial resources to dedicate to tools development | :* Some may have financial resources to dedicate to tools development | ||
| − | ::* | + | ::* epSOS - IHE Europe working to become testing contractor for EU projects |
| − | ::* NIST | + | ::* NIST - has funding for US ARRA testing and will issue RFP in early 2010 |
::* Various "Projectathons" for deployment activities | ::* Various "Projectathons" for deployment activities | ||
::* Focused virtual Connectathons with smaller scope and number of participants | ::* Focused virtual Connectathons with smaller scope and number of participants | ||
:* Funding would come with additional requirements and shared control | :* Funding would come with additional requirements and shared control | ||
:* Need to be prepared to respond to requests for services | :* Need to be prepared to respond to requests for services | ||
| + | :* Currently the lead organizations are constrained in being able to mobilize labor resources to the problem | ||
| + | :* Financing and resources devoted to Gazelle are not sufficiently well documented or widely understood | ||
| + | :* Priority milestones to win epSOS/NIST contracts need to be determined (and expressed in clear messaging) and firm target dates established | ||
| + | |||
Revision as of 12:04, 9 November 2009
Attendees
- Chris Carr
- Didi Davis
- Geert Claeys
- Bruce Curran
- Cor Loef
- Joan McMillen
- Steve Moore
- Charles Parisot
- Eric Poiseau
- Lisa Spellman
Minutes
1) Test Data Repository
- Reviewed proposal developed by Steve Moore
- Create consent form and Wiki page for Vendors willing to share their data sets publicly
- Gazelle has "Objects" feature that allows testing participants to upload test data sets and makes them visible to participants testing complementary roles
- Eric's team will continue to develop this feature; it will be part of testing at IHE Europe Connectathon in April 2010
- Consider implementing consent form for publication of test data on public "repository" page in 2011
- Action Item: Chris Carr to work on consent language for publication of test data
2) Gazelle Status
- Discussed proposal for restructuring management of Gazelle project presented by Charles Parisot
- Currently development of Gazelle is a joint project led by the Connectathon Managers, Eric Poiseau/INRIA and Steve Moore/MIR
- Connectathon testing has been successful, but absorbs labor resources of Connectathon Manangers, leaving relatively little for tools development
- Demand for testing services is emerging in a number of national projects worldwide
- Some may have financial resources to dedicate to tools development
- epSOS - IHE Europe working to become testing contractor for EU projects
- NIST - has funding for US ARRA testing and will issue RFP in early 2010
- Various "Projectathons" for deployment activities
- Focused virtual Connectathons with smaller scope and number of participants
- Funding would come with additional requirements and shared control
- Need to be prepared to respond to requests for services
- Currently the lead organizations are constrained in being able to mobilize labor resources to the problem
- Financing and resources devoted to Gazelle are not sufficiently well documented or widely understood
- Priority milestones to win epSOS/NIST contracts need to be determined (and expressed in clear messaging) and firm target dates established
3) Connectathon Mgr Training
- Proposed date/location: June/Oak Brook
- Faculty, curriculum, logistics
- Targeted promotion
4) Product Registry
5) Other Issues?