Difference between revisions of "IHE Testing and Tools Committee 2009-03-30 Teleconference Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
− | * Steve Moore | + | * Lisa Carnahan, NIST |
− | * Eric Poiseau | + | * Steve Moore, MIR |
− | * Joan McMillen | + | * Charles Parisot, GE |
− | + | * Eric Poiseau, INRIA | |
− | + | * Rob Snelick, NIST | |
+ | * Joan McMillen, RSNA | ||
* Chris Carr, RSNA | * Chris Carr, RSNA | ||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
::* January 2010 Connectathon to use Gazelle | ::* January 2010 Connectathon to use Gazelle | ||
::* Eric's group (INRIA) to devote focused attention to test engine over the next few months | ::* Eric's group (INRIA) to devote focused attention to test engine over the next few months | ||
+ | :::* Porting 600+ existing tests into test management framework will require time | ||
+ | :::* Critical task is to refine the test engine first to make population with test scripts possible (need to be defined in BPEL) | ||
+ | :::* Refactoring of Kudu tests will improve organization and efficiency, but again requires effort | ||
+ | ::* MIR has two engineer FTEs working on Gazelle (also performs Connectathon management and domain committee work/test plan development) | ||
+ | ::* INRIA has three FTEs working on Gazelle | ||
+ | :::* Eric currently applying for renewal of team's funding | ||
+ | :::* MIR contract renewal with HIMSS/RSNA under discussion: likely equivalent or slightly reduced support | ||
+ | ::* Plus management oversight by Eric and Steve (one FTE total) | ||
::* Delays have made it difficult for NIST to link up its simulation tools | ::* Delays have made it difficult for NIST to link up its simulation tools | ||
+ | |||
:* NIST Plans | :* NIST Plans | ||
+ | ::* NIST likely to get specified funds for Test Tools Development | ||
+ | :::* Designed to be used up over next 2 years | ||
+ | :::* Most of the funding to be contracted out | ||
+ | ::* Increase of 2-3 FTEs internally | ||
+ | ::* Need to develop tools with ability to support NHIN, CCHIT testing (as well as IHE) | ||
+ | ::* Need to coordinate timelines and development plans to avoid redundancy and conflict | ||
+ | :* Willing to undertake connections to test services other gaps in development work: focus on external validation services (EVS), eg, CDA validator and linking of simulation tools | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* IHE Europe in discussion with EC about funding for development of platform for tools (Mandate 403) | ||
+ | ::* Charles will forward report | ||
+ | ::* Important to highlight international aspect of development effort | ||
+ | |||
:* CCHIT and Cypress | :* CCHIT and Cypress | ||
+ | ::* NIST to convene a kickoff meeting among groups sometime around mid-April | ||
2) [http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcknbdz7_1ds7c95hd Connectathon Process Guidelines] | 2) [http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcknbdz7_1ds7c95hd Connectathon Process Guidelines] | ||
:* Review updated draft of Connectathon QC guidelines and Sponsor requirements | :* Review updated draft of Connectathon QC guidelines and Sponsor requirements | ||
+ | ::* Place responsibility for test plan development on national deployment committees holding Connectathons | ||
+ | ::* Chris Carr to develop matrix of technical project managers, domains and funding groups | ||
− | 3) [http://product-registry.ihe.net/ Product Registry] Development and Rollout | + | 3) [http://product-registry.ihe.net/ Product Registry] Development and Rollout [Deferred to next tcon] |
:* Vendor input pilot | :* Vendor input pilot | ||
:* User review pilot | :* User review pilot | ||
− | 4) Connectathon Monitor/Project Manager Training Event | + | 4) Connectathon Monitor/Project Manager Training Event [Deferred to next tcon] |
:* Date | :* Date | ||
:* Location | :* Location | ||
:* Cost | :* Cost | ||
:* Target Audience | :* Target Audience | ||
− | + | :* Eric and Steve to develop a proposal for event | |
Latest revision as of 13:17, 30 March 2009
Attendees
- Lisa Carnahan, NIST
- Steve Moore, MIR
- Charles Parisot, GE
- Eric Poiseau, INRIA
- Rob Snelick, NIST
- Joan McMillen, RSNA
- Chris Carr, RSNA
Minutes
1) Tools Development Planning with NIST
-
- January 2010 Connectathon to use Gazelle
- Eric's group (INRIA) to devote focused attention to test engine over the next few months
- Porting 600+ existing tests into test management framework will require time
- Critical task is to refine the test engine first to make population with test scripts possible (need to be defined in BPEL)
- Refactoring of Kudu tests will improve organization and efficiency, but again requires effort
- MIR has two engineer FTEs working on Gazelle (also performs Connectathon management and domain committee work/test plan development)
- INRIA has three FTEs working on Gazelle
- Eric currently applying for renewal of team's funding
- MIR contract renewal with HIMSS/RSNA under discussion: likely equivalent or slightly reduced support
- Plus management oversight by Eric and Steve (one FTE total)
- Delays have made it difficult for NIST to link up its simulation tools
- NIST Plans
- NIST likely to get specified funds for Test Tools Development
- Designed to be used up over next 2 years
- Most of the funding to be contracted out
- Increase of 2-3 FTEs internally
- Need to develop tools with ability to support NHIN, CCHIT testing (as well as IHE)
- Need to coordinate timelines and development plans to avoid redundancy and conflict
- Willing to undertake connections to test services other gaps in development work: focus on external validation services (EVS), eg, CDA validator and linking of simulation tools
- IHE Europe in discussion with EC about funding for development of platform for tools (Mandate 403)
- Charles will forward report
- Important to highlight international aspect of development effort
- CCHIT and Cypress
- NIST to convene a kickoff meeting among groups sometime around mid-April
2) Connectathon Process Guidelines
- Review updated draft of Connectathon QC guidelines and Sponsor requirements
- Place responsibility for test plan development on national deployment committees holding Connectathons
- Chris Carr to develop matrix of technical project managers, domains and funding groups
3) Product Registry Development and Rollout [Deferred to next tcon]
- Vendor input pilot
- User review pilot
4) Connectathon Monitor/Project Manager Training Event [Deferred to next tcon]
- Date
- Location
- Cost
- Target Audience
- Eric and Steve to develop a proposal for event