Difference between revisions of "IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2015-11-18"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 49: Line 49:
  
 
===Domain Coordination Issues===
 
===Domain Coordination Issues===
* Strategy for incorporating FHIR into IHE Connectathon testing and profiles. [https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9_jYVJ2XnXsTnRIWmRKSk9nT0E/view?usp=sharing FHIR Issues Document]
+
* Strategy for incorporating FHIR into IHE profiles and Connectathon testing
:* Should profiles be based on DSTU’s? Should that affect the status of those profiles? Eg, should a profile based on a DSTU be allowed to go to final text? Trial implementation?
+
:* Steve Moore developed [https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9_jYVJ2XnXsTnRIWmRKSk9nT0E/view?usp=sharing Document outlining FHIR-related Issues] after attending ITI meetings and Keith Boone's training session
:* How do we align IHE profile development and testing with FHIR’s development and testing cycles?
+
:* Questions include timing of adoption of FHIR for profiles and for Connectathon testing; how to reference FHIR resources; how frequently to update profiles to incorporate evolving FHIR resource specifications.
:* Scheduling and coordination of cycles (HL7 DSTU vs. IHE development cycles)
+
* HL7 has identified different levels of maturity (0-5) for FHIR resources than were used for previous HL7 standards
:* Tooling development - when to invest in validation tools
+
:* Independent of the question of whether something is in DSTU or is "Normative"
 +
:* FHIR is currently on DSTU 2 and HL7 has plans to release 2.1 (in May) and 3
 +
:* Need to identify the maturity level of each resource and the source DSTU in profiles based on FHIR
 +
:* Profiles should not go to final text until the underlying standards are fully mature
 +
:* Create list of resources and current maturity level
 +
:* ITI has formed a work group to coordinate how different domains profile FHIR
 +
::* John Moehrke and Keith Boone have been tagged as leaders of that group
 +
:* Need guidance in terms of timing and coordination of testing resources for Connecathons
 +
::* Domain Committees need to keep abreast of the evolution of FHIR standards
 +
:* Require that profiles always reference the "Current Official Published Version" and include the version number
 +
:* Looking to define guidelines for use by all domains
 +
::* Experience developing MHD profile gives ITI a good perspective on the possibilities and limitations of using FHIR. Plan on republishing all FHIR-based supplements (MHD, PIX/PDQ, etc.) in new versions by March to address changes in DSTU 2 update
 
:* '''Action:''' Invite ITI leadership work group to next DCC teleconference and review above questions regarding guidelines needed for profile development based on FHIR (referencing, timing, cycles, etc.) across domains
 
:* '''Action:''' Invite ITI leadership work group to next DCC teleconference and review above questions regarding guidelines needed for profile development based on FHIR (referencing, timing, cycles, etc.) across domains
  
 
* Reconvening of Documentation Work Group
 
* Reconvening of Documentation Work Group
:* Redefinition of Templates
+
:* Refinement of Templates
 
::* Potential change of approach to profile publication
 
::* Potential change of approach to profile publication
 
::* Managing obsolete documents
 
::* Managing obsolete documents
 
::* A call for participation distributed by Nichole and Nancy
 
::* A call for participation distributed by Nichole and Nancy
:* Main issues with templates
+
:* Main issues with templates include:
::* Adding additional content to templates
+
::* Adding new content types
 
::* Updating glossary and actor list
 
::* Updating glossary and actor list
:* '''Action:''' Mary J. to schedule a call with interested candidates
+
:* '''Action:''' Mary J. and RSNA to schedule a call with interested work group volunteers
  
 
* Tools and Processes for OID, Name Space Management
 
* Tools and Processes for OID, Name Space Management
 
:* Interest in reconvening this work group
 
:* Interest in reconvening this work group
:* Never developed official process
+
:* Previous discussions did not lead to development of an official process
:* Extracting existing OIDs that exact - still work to be done
+
:* Extracting OIDs from existing profiles is a challenge that has not yet been addressed
:* Seeking suggestions for completing extraction work and developing a management process
+
::* Recent profiles have a defined section where authors declare OIDs
:* Eric. P investigating converting docs
+
:* Seeking suggestions for completing extraction work and develop an ongoing management and publication process
 
:* Ultimate goal is to have library where items reside
 
:* Ultimate goal is to have library where items reside
 
:* '''Action:''' Distribute call for interested candidates to reconvene working group
 
:* '''Action:''' Distribute call for interested candidates to reconvene working group

Revision as of 11:20, 18 November 2015

Participants

  • Mary Jungers (Document Specialist)
  • Chris Lindop (RAD)
  • Steve Moore (WUSTL)
  • Monroe Pattillo (PCD)
  • Amit Popat (QRPH)
  • Paul Sherman (PCD)
  • Teri Sippel Schmidt (RAD)
  • Jose Costa Teixeira (PHARM)
  • Mauro Zanardini (ITI)


  • Non-voting: Jamie Kontos, Chris Carr, Nancy Ramirez

Quorum not met

General Committee Business

1. Roll Call see Roster

2. Approval of Minutes

  • Review for approval - deferred

3. New Business: from Future Agenda Topics Page

4. Review Action Items List

  • Deferred for approval due to quorum not achieved

Domain Announcements

1. Domain Milestone Dates

2. Domain Board Reports

  • Action: Chris C. to contact Dr. Lemke and Franziska for clarity on domain activities
  • Deferred for approval

Domain Coordination Issues

  • Strategy for incorporating FHIR into IHE profiles and Connectathon testing
  • Steve Moore developed Document outlining FHIR-related Issues after attending ITI meetings and Keith Boone's training session
  • Questions include timing of adoption of FHIR for profiles and for Connectathon testing; how to reference FHIR resources; how frequently to update profiles to incorporate evolving FHIR resource specifications.
  • HL7 has identified different levels of maturity (0-5) for FHIR resources than were used for previous HL7 standards
  • Independent of the question of whether something is in DSTU or is "Normative"
  • FHIR is currently on DSTU 2 and HL7 has plans to release 2.1 (in May) and 3
  • Need to identify the maturity level of each resource and the source DSTU in profiles based on FHIR
  • Profiles should not go to final text until the underlying standards are fully mature
  • Create list of resources and current maturity level
  • ITI has formed a work group to coordinate how different domains profile FHIR
  • John Moehrke and Keith Boone have been tagged as leaders of that group
  • Need guidance in terms of timing and coordination of testing resources for Connecathons
  • Domain Committees need to keep abreast of the evolution of FHIR standards
  • Require that profiles always reference the "Current Official Published Version" and include the version number
  • Looking to define guidelines for use by all domains
  • Experience developing MHD profile gives ITI a good perspective on the possibilities and limitations of using FHIR. Plan on republishing all FHIR-based supplements (MHD, PIX/PDQ, etc.) in new versions by March to address changes in DSTU 2 update
  • Action: Invite ITI leadership work group to next DCC teleconference and review above questions regarding guidelines needed for profile development based on FHIR (referencing, timing, cycles, etc.) across domains
  • Reconvening of Documentation Work Group
  • Refinement of Templates
  • Potential change of approach to profile publication
  • Managing obsolete documents
  • A call for participation distributed by Nichole and Nancy
  • Main issues with templates include:
  • Adding new content types
  • Updating glossary and actor list
  • Action: Mary J. and RSNA to schedule a call with interested work group volunteers
  • Tools and Processes for OID, Name Space Management
  • Interest in reconvening this work group
  • Previous discussions did not lead to development of an official process
  • Extracting OIDs from existing profiles is a challenge that has not yet been addressed
  • Recent profiles have a defined section where authors declare OIDs
  • Seeking suggestions for completing extraction work and develop an ongoing management and publication process
  • Ultimate goal is to have library where items reside
  • Action: Distribute call for interested candidates to reconvene working group
  • Review the current listing of IHE Profiles implemented and in use in major US initiatives

Documentation, Websites and Public Information

  • Reconvening Documentation Work Group shortly after beginning of new year

Governance Implementation

  • Membership Update
  • Committee Feedback

New Business

Next steps and New Actions Items

  • December DCC Tcon: December 15, 9am-10:30am CT (due to holiday the next week)


Domain Coordination Committee