Difference between revisions of "IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2013-12-17"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
5. Domain Committee Review of Test Plans | 5. Domain Committee Review of Test Plans | ||
+ | :* Currently no review of test plans by committees; feasible to add? | ||
+ | :* There would be a huge backlog if we tried to do all published profiles; focus on those being offered for 17025 Accredited Testing | ||
+ | :* Review would have some formal aspects: criteria, time on agenda, formal committee approval vote | ||
+ | :* RO already performs a similar review, but in a limited and somewhat informal setting | ||
+ | :* Domain project managers would welcome the review | ||
+ | :* Perform review after first round of Connectathon testing; make a requirement before advancing profile to final text status | ||
+ | :* Some test plans could take several hours to a few days to review | ||
+ | :* Profile author is the best positioned person to review; should be thinking about testability in writing profiles. Profile author could identify potential test partners to help with review. | ||
+ | :* Proposed process details: | ||
+ | ::* Prior to final text publication | ||
+ | ::* Within 12 months of initial submission for TI publication | ||
+ | :* '''Action Item:''' Chris, Kevin, Mary and Steve will develop proposal | ||
===[[Domain Communication|Domain Announcements]]=== | ===[[Domain Communication|Domain Announcements]]=== |
Revision as of 10:56, 17 December 2013
Minutes
Agenda
General Committee Business
1. Roll Call see Roster
2. Approval of November 19 Minutes
3. New Business: from Future Agenda Topics Page
4. Review Action Items List
5. Domain Committee Review of Test Plans
- Currently no review of test plans by committees; feasible to add?
- There would be a huge backlog if we tried to do all published profiles; focus on those being offered for 17025 Accredited Testing
- Review would have some formal aspects: criteria, time on agenda, formal committee approval vote
- RO already performs a similar review, but in a limited and somewhat informal setting
- Domain project managers would welcome the review
- Perform review after first round of Connectathon testing; make a requirement before advancing profile to final text status
- Some test plans could take several hours to a few days to review
- Profile author is the best positioned person to review; should be thinking about testability in writing profiles. Profile author could identify potential test partners to help with review.
- Proposed process details:
- Prior to final text publication
- Within 12 months of initial submission for TI publication
- Action Item: Chris, Kevin, Mary and Steve will develop proposal
Domain Announcements
2. Domain Board Reports
- Surgery Report
- Cardiology report (will submit mid-Jamuary)
Domain Coordination Issues
- Cross-Domain Strategic Planning Work Group
- Review dashboard to track status of work groups
- mHealth Task Force
Documentation, Websites and Public Information
- Documentation Work Group
1. Proposal for Documentation Scheduling
2. Wiki tagging
- Next call: January 27th 9:00am-10:30am central
Governance Implementation
*Next call January 27th 9:00-10:30 central