Difference between revisions of "IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2012-01-31"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 73: Line 73:
 
:* [http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail.cfm?dstuid=69 IHE/HL7 Implementation Guide Link]
 
:* [http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail.cfm?dstuid=69 IHE/HL7 Implementation Guide Link]
  
- Developing volume 3 supplement template for definition of content modules
+
*Developing volume 3 supplement template for definition of content modules
- The model of adopting IHE Cardiology CIRC profile as a general model is called into question by publication of Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) Implementation Guide by HL7 IHE Health Story  
+
**The model of adopting IHE Cardiology CIRC profile as a general model is called into question by publication of Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) Implementation Guide by HL7 IHE Health Story  
- Action Item: Teri Sippel to try to set up call between IHE Documentation Work Group and IHE Health Story Consolidation Project (under Structured Document Work Group)
+
*** '''Action:''' Teri Sippel to try to set up call between IHE Documentation Work Group and IHE Health Story Consolidation Project (under Structured Document Work Group)
  
 
* Reinvigorating development committee volunteer activity - continue discussion- Karen W
 
* Reinvigorating development committee volunteer activity - continue discussion- Karen W
 
:* IHE Board is requesting advice on above topic
 
:* IHE Board is requesting advice on above topic
 
:* General concern is that committees are becoming fragmented where small groups, or individuals, develop profiles and there is little cross-review amongst the different profile development mini-groups.  Result is lower quality profiles.  Is there anything the DCC or Board can do to help the situation?
 
:* General concern is that committees are becoming fragmented where small groups, or individuals, develop profiles and there is little cross-review amongst the different profile development mini-groups.  Result is lower quality profiles.  Is there anything the DCC or Board can do to help the situation?
:* Please see the meeting minutes from the January 17th DCC call for proposals and discussions: [[IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2012-01-17 | January 17, 2012 Minutes]]
+
*Please see the meeting minutes from the January 17th DCC call for proposals and discussions:  
 
+
**[[IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2012-01-17 January 17, 2012 Minutes]]
- Discussed implementing rules around document review within committee
+
*** Discussed implementing rules around document review within committee
- Require that every supplement published have two designated reviewers, who need to submit comments
+
*** Require that every supplement published have two designated reviewers, who need to submit comments
- Reviewers would be listed on title page along with authors
+
*** Reviewers would be listed on title page along with authors
- Cross-domain review has not proven practical in previous efforts
+
*** Cross-domain review has not proven practical in previous efforts
- Require named reviewers on Trial Implemenation drafts of documents; build that as a requirement in the supplement template; make submission of reviewer names part of data about the document published elsewhere (not in the document itself, perhaps in Mary Jungers' publication database)
+
*** Require named reviewers on Trial Implemenation drafts of documents; build that as a requirement in the supplement template; make submission of reviewer names part of data about the document published elsewhere (not in the document itself, perhaps in Mary Jungers' publication database)
- Record in minutes when a given profile has been discussed in committee
+
*** Record in minutes when a given profile has been discussed in committee
- Volume 1 needs to be heavily reviewed in committee; implementers needed to review Volume 2
+
*** Volume 1 needs to be heavily reviewed in committee; implementers needed to review Volume 2
- Action Item: Kevin O'Donnell will implement reviewer policy in Radiology  
+
*** Action Item: Kevin O'Donnell will implement reviewer policy in Radiology
  
 
===Documentation, Websites and Public Information===
 
===Documentation, Websites and Public Information===

Revision as of 14:02, 1 February 2012

Attendees

  • Juergen Brandstaetter-Pharmacy
  • Sidrah Abdul-RO
  • Flora Lum-Eye Care
  • Kevin O'Donnell-Radiology
  • Karen Witting-ITI
  • Antje Schroeder-Cardiology
  • Didi Davis-QRPH
  • Rob Horn-ITI Tech
  • Tom Dolan-Cardiology
  • John Rhodes-PCC
  • Mary Jungers-Document Specialist
  • Teri Sippel-Schmidt-Process Specialist
  • Joan McMillen-RSNA
  • Chris Carr-RSNA
  • La Shawn Edwards-RSNA

Minutes

General Committee Business

1. Roll Call see Roster

  • Top Truancy : PCC & Pathology (tie) - absent last 5 meetings

2. Approval of December 20, 2011 Minutes

  • Approved with one abstention.
  • Approved with one abstention.
  • Approved with two abstentions.

3. New Business: from Future Agenda Topics Page

4. Review Action Items List

Domain Announcements

1. Domain Milestone Dates

  • reminder - follow the Domain Announcements link for simple templates for announcements
    • Please add domain announcements for your domain here prior to the tcon

2. Domain Board Reports (10 min - Karen Witting)

  • Status
    • New Provisional board report template
  • Provisional template to review on the Feb. 14 agenda
    • Action: Kevin O'Donnell will provide to DCC/Karen Witting
    • Action: Chris Carr will send to Dental and Endoscopy for trial use
    • Action: Would like to have new draft for Feb. 14 meeting; drafts due by Feb. 12
    • Dental Report Board_Report_IHE_Dental Domain-2011_01_03.doc
  • Defer Dental review until March Board meeting
  • Endoscopy Board Report Comments
    • Use template (start-up or original to prepare report)
    • Co-chairs need to attend DCC
    • Secretary needs to be the name of an individual and the organization he/she represents
    • Need same information for Board Rep
    • Mission needs to be broader than current focus on a single profile
    • Adapt timeline to existing models
    • Sequence of events needs to follow the prescribed pattern
    • Publication is centralized and goes through IHE International

Domain Coordination Issues

  • Important Item: Walk through draft Strategic Plan presentation to Board
  • Defer to Feb. 14; Chris Carr to notify Mike Nusbaum
  • Update on IHE/HL7 CDA Consolidation project: "HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA® Release 2: IHE Health Story Consolidation, Release 1 - US Realm " - anyone???
  • Developing volume 3 supplement template for definition of content modules
    • The model of adopting IHE Cardiology CIRC profile as a general model is called into question by publication of Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) Implementation Guide by HL7 IHE Health Story
      • Action: Teri Sippel to try to set up call between IHE Documentation Work Group and IHE Health Story Consolidation Project (under Structured Document Work Group)
  • Reinvigorating development committee volunteer activity - continue discussion- Karen W
  • IHE Board is requesting advice on above topic
  • General concern is that committees are becoming fragmented where small groups, or individuals, develop profiles and there is little cross-review amongst the different profile development mini-groups. Result is lower quality profiles. Is there anything the DCC or Board can do to help the situation?
  • Please see the meeting minutes from the January 17th DCC call for proposals and discussions:
    • IHE Domain Coordination Committee Teleconference Minutes 2012-01-17 January 17, 2012 Minutes
      • Discussed implementing rules around document review within committee
      • Require that every supplement published have two designated reviewers, who need to submit comments
      • Reviewers would be listed on title page along with authors
      • Cross-domain review has not proven practical in previous efforts
      • Require named reviewers on Trial Implemenation drafts of documents; build that as a requirement in the supplement template; make submission of reviewer names part of data about the document published elsewhere (not in the document itself, perhaps in Mary Jungers' publication database)
      • Record in minutes when a given profile has been discussed in committee
      • Volume 1 needs to be heavily reviewed in committee; implementers needed to review Volume 2
      • Action Item: Kevin O'Donnell will implement reviewer policy in Radiology

Documentation, Websites and Public Information

  • Documentation Work Group (15 min - Teri Sippel Schmidt; Mary Jungers)
  • progress made on General Intro, Vol 1, Vol 2, Vol 4 "shells" for new domains and for eventual transition by existing domains
  • progress on Content Module Supplement Template - really looking for input from PCC and QRPH
  • proposal for Volume 3 structure, looking for early feedback since this will affect YOU:
    • 1: Introduction
    • 2: This section intentionally left blank.
    • 3: This section intentionally left blank.
    • 4: Data Models (e.g., bindings, meta data model)
    • 5: This section intentionally left blank.
    • 6: Content Module Definitions
  • Volume 3 supplement template will be forthcoming in the next several weeks. Requires resolution of questions about CDA Consolidation Project above.
  • Technical Framework Publication Planning and Schedule - 2012 cycle (10 min Mary Jungers)
  • reminder of/reintroduction to the process
  • Hard dates needed for the testing and tools committee
  • Mary will be making calls to Domain Co-chairs this week to confirm publication schedule

Governance Implementation

Next steps and New Actions Items

  • Next Call Feb 14, 2012, 9am-10:30am CT

Domain Coordination Committee