Difference between revisions of "IHE Domain Coordination Committee 2009-04-28 Teleconference Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
|||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*Chris Carr - RSNA | *Chris Carr - RSNA | ||
*Nichole Drye-Mayo - RSNA | *Nichole Drye-Mayo - RSNA | ||
− | *Guest: Frank Oemig | + | *Guest: Frank Oemig - Agfa |
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
2. Laboratory: Opening Public Comment | 2. Laboratory: Opening Public Comment | ||
− | :* Publication Plan: Soon Comments Due: | + | :* Publication Plan: Soon Comments Due: May 23, 2009 |
− | ::* | + | ::* White Paper on External Laboratory Order |
+ | ::* No specific feedback requested | ||
3. ITI: Evaluated for Final Text | 3. ITI: Evaluated for Final Text | ||
− | :* | + | :* [[Final Text Process | Evaluation process]] followed. Worked well. No changes recommended. |
− | + | :* See [[Minutes_Nov_2008_-_Sep_2009#March_31_2009_ITI_Final_Text_Prioritization | March 31 minutes]] | |
− | ::* Evaluation process followed. Worked well. No changes recommended. | + | ::* XDS.b Approved pending outcome of Euro-Connectathon; Final decision in May |
+ | ::* PDQ.v3 Approved pending development of test tools, resolution of CPs and outcome of Euro-Connectathon | ||
+ | ::* PIX/PDQ Approved pending development of test tools, resolution of CPs and outcome of Euro-Connectathon | ||
+ | ::* XDR not approved due to lack of implementations and testing | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. ITI: Evaluated for Retirement | ||
+ | :* [[Evaluation of Published Profiles | Evaluation process]] followed. Worked well. No changes recommended. | ||
+ | :* See [[Minutes_Nov_2008_-_Sep_2009#March_31_2009_ITI_Final_Text_Prioritization | March 31 minutes]] | ||
+ | ::* XDS.a proposed for retirement due to universal vendor shift to XDS.b which makes XDS.a redundant. | ||
+ | ::* Final decision will be made in May | ||
===Domain Coordination Issues=== | ===Domain Coordination Issues=== | ||
− | 1. R2/ | + | 1. R2/RE Discussion |
:* Outcomes of 4/16 Tcon | :* Outcomes of 4/16 Tcon | ||
+ | *Optionality and Terminology Discussion | ||
+ | :* R2 vs RE is one example of terminology discrepancies within technical frameworks | ||
+ | :* [http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dfgq2bt6_12gr8q3qcx Frank Oemig presented a document] that attempts to address these issues and provide a consistent explanation of each | ||
+ | :* Normative language terms need to be defined and documented here; likely remain a stable reference | ||
+ | :* Needs to include specific mapping to underlying standards; consistent with terminology used in underlying standards | ||
+ | :* Intended to provide abstract use case descriptions; not to address how individual profiles work, dependencies, etc. | ||
+ | :* Provides guidance to profile authors, but also for implementers of profiles | ||
+ | :* '''Action Item:''' Chris Carr to circulate Frank Oemig's optionality document to co-chairs and profile authors; co-chairs and profile authors to provide comments to Frank Oemig; Frank Oemig will continue to be primary edit document | ||
+ | ::* Review again on May 26 (?) tcon | ||
===Documentation, Websites and Public Information=== | ===Documentation, Websites and Public Information=== | ||
Line 57: | Line 76: | ||
===Governance Implementation=== | ===Governance Implementation=== | ||
1. Adherence to balloting process for co-chair elections | 1. Adherence to balloting process for co-chair elections | ||
− | |||
:* Deprecation process needs review: what are the steps needed to document, etc. | :* Deprecation process needs review: what are the steps needed to document, etc. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Laboratory | + | * Laboratory Domain holding co-chair elections at Kyoto meeting: |
:* Governance document requires 15-day email ballot for co-chairs | :* Governance document requires 15-day email ballot for co-chairs | ||
:* '''Action Item: Chris Carr''' to communicate requirement to Lab secretary the requirement in Governance document for email ballot | :* '''Action Item: Chris Carr''' to communicate requirement to Lab secretary the requirement in Governance document for email ballot | ||
− | Teleconference Access is not always being offered for domain meetings | + | * Teleconference Access is not always being offered for domain meetings |
:* Impress upon domain secretaries that telephone access is highly advised | :* Impress upon domain secretaries that telephone access is highly advised | ||
− | :* Teleconference access for detailed discussions is not optimal; committee members should be encouraged to attend face-to-face meetings; but access for votes | + | :* Teleconference access for detailed discussions is not optimal; committee members should be encouraged to attend face-to-face meetings; but access for votes must be provided by tcon to facilitate international participation |
− | |||
− | |||
===Next steps and New Actions Items=== | ===Next steps and New Actions Items=== |
Latest revision as of 15:31, 11 May 2009
Attendees
- Mike Nusbaum, ITI Plan
- Tone Southerland - PCC Tech
- Rick Butler - Eye Care Tech
- John Rhoades - PCD Tech
- Steve Merritt - PCD Tech
- Karen Witting - ITI Tech
- Kevin O'Donnell - Radiology Plan
- Jason Colquitt - QRPH Tech
- Ken Fuchs - PCD Plan
- John Donnelly - PCC Plan
- Bruce Curran - RO
- Steve Moore - MIR
- Lisa Spellman - HIMSS
- Chris Carr - RSNA
- Nichole Drye-Mayo - RSNA
- Guest: Frank Oemig - Agfa
Minutes
General Committee Business
1. Roll Call see Roster
2. Approval of Minutes
3. New Business: from Future Agenda Topics Page
4. Review Action Items List
- Reviewed sample text in draft Domain Mission Statements
Domain Announcements
2. Laboratory: Opening Public Comment
- Publication Plan: Soon Comments Due: May 23, 2009
- White Paper on External Laboratory Order
- No specific feedback requested
3. ITI: Evaluated for Final Text
- Evaluation process followed. Worked well. No changes recommended.
- See March 31 minutes
- XDS.b Approved pending outcome of Euro-Connectathon; Final decision in May
- PDQ.v3 Approved pending development of test tools, resolution of CPs and outcome of Euro-Connectathon
- PIX/PDQ Approved pending development of test tools, resolution of CPs and outcome of Euro-Connectathon
- XDR not approved due to lack of implementations and testing
4. ITI: Evaluated for Retirement
- Evaluation process followed. Worked well. No changes recommended.
- See March 31 minutes
- XDS.a proposed for retirement due to universal vendor shift to XDS.b which makes XDS.a redundant.
- Final decision will be made in May
Domain Coordination Issues
1. R2/RE Discussion
- Outcomes of 4/16 Tcon
- Optionality and Terminology Discussion
- R2 vs RE is one example of terminology discrepancies within technical frameworks
- Frank Oemig presented a document that attempts to address these issues and provide a consistent explanation of each
- Normative language terms need to be defined and documented here; likely remain a stable reference
- Needs to include specific mapping to underlying standards; consistent with terminology used in underlying standards
- Intended to provide abstract use case descriptions; not to address how individual profiles work, dependencies, etc.
- Provides guidance to profile authors, but also for implementers of profiles
- Action Item: Chris Carr to circulate Frank Oemig's optionality document to co-chairs and profile authors; co-chairs and profile authors to provide comments to Frank Oemig; Frank Oemig will continue to be primary edit document
- Review again on May 26 (?) tcon
Documentation, Websites and Public Information
1. Supplement Packaging for TI and PC
2. Radiology Board Report
- Reviewed Draft Document
Governance Implementation
1. Adherence to balloting process for co-chair elections
- Deprecation process needs review: what are the steps needed to document, etc.
- Laboratory Domain holding co-chair elections at Kyoto meeting:
- Governance document requires 15-day email ballot for co-chairs
- Action Item: Chris Carr to communicate requirement to Lab secretary the requirement in Governance document for email ballot
- Teleconference Access is not always being offered for domain meetings
- Impress upon domain secretaries that telephone access is highly advised
- Teleconference access for detailed discussions is not optimal; committee members should be encouraged to attend face-to-face meetings; but access for votes must be provided by tcon to facilitate international participation