Difference between revisions of "IHE Domain Coordination Committee 2009-04-28 Teleconference Minutes"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 71: Line 71:
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
−
Optionality and Terminology Discussion
+
 
−
:* R2 vs RE is one example of terminology discrepancies within technical frameworks
 
−
:* Frank Oemig presented document that attempts to address these issues and provide a consistent explanation of each
 
−
:* Normative language terms need to be defined and documented here; likely remain a stable reference
 
−
:* Needs to include specific mapping to underlying standards; consistent with terminology used in underlying standards
 
−
:* Intended to provide abstract use case descriptions; not to address how individual profiles work, dependencies, etc.
 
−
:* Provides guidance to profile authors, but also for implementers of profiles
 
 
   
 
   
 
:* Action Item: Circulate to co-chairs and profile authors to provide comments to Frank Oemig; Frank Oemig will continue to edit document
 
:* Action Item: Circulate to co-chairs and profile authors to provide comments to Frank Oemig; Frank Oemig will continue to edit document
Line 94: Line 88:
 
:* Impress upon domain secretaries that telephone access is highly advised
 
:* Impress upon domain secretaries that telephone access is highly advised
 
:* Teleconference access for detailed discussions is not optimal; committee members should be encouraged to attend face-to-face meetings; but access for votes
 
:* Teleconference access for detailed discussions is not optimal; committee members should be encouraged to attend face-to-face meetings; but access for votes
−
 
 
−
 
  
 
===Next steps and New Actions Items===
 
===Next steps and New Actions Items===

Revision as of 14:07, 11 May 2009

Attendees

  • Mike Nusbaum, ITI Plan
  • Tone Southerland - PCC Tech
  • Rick Butler - Eye Care Tech
  • John Rhoades - PCD Tech
  • Steve Merritt - PCD Tech
  • Karen Witting - ITI Tech
  • Kevin O'Donnell - Radiology Plan
  • Jason Colquitt - QRPH Tech
  • Ken Fuchs - PCD Plan
  • John Donnelly - PCC Plan
  • Bruce Curran - RO
  • Steve Moore - MIR
  • Lisa Spellman - HIMSS
  • Chris Carr - RSNA
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo - RSNA
  • Guest: Frank Oemig, Agfa

Minutes

General Committee Business

1. Roll Call see Roster

2. Approval of Minutes


3. New Business: from Future Agenda Topics Page

4. Review Action Items List

Domain Announcements

1. Domain Milestone Dates

2. Laboratory: Opening Public Comment

  • Publication Plan: Soon Comments Due: May 23, 2009
  • White Paper on External Laboratory Order
  • No specific feedback requested

3. ITI: Evaluated for Final Text

  • XDS.b Approved pending outcome of Euro-Connectathon; Final decision in May
  • PDQ.v3 Approved pending development of test tools, resolution of CPs and outcome of Euro-Connectathon
  • PIX/PDQ Approved pending development of test tools, resolution of CPs and outcome of Euro-Connectathon
  • XDR not approved due to lack of implementations and testing

4. ITI: Evaluated for Retirement

  • XDS.a proposed for retirement due to universal vendor shift to XDS.b which makes XDS.a redundant.
  • Final decision will be made in May

Domain Coordination Issues

1. R2/RO Discussion

  • Outcomes of 4/16 Tcon

Documentation, Websites and Public Information

1. Supplement Packaging for TI and PC

2. Radiology Board Report

Governance Implementation

1. Adherence to balloting process for co-chair elections

  • Deprecation process needs review: what are the steps needed to document, etc.



  • Action Item: Circulate to co-chairs and profile authors to provide comments to Frank Oemig; Frank Oemig will continue to edit document
  • Review again on May 26 (?) tcon


Supplements: One profile per supplement; only publish supplements (not TF as Trial Implementation)

  • Follow format on supplement publishing pages for ITI and Radiology


Laboratory Holding Co-chair Elections in Kyoto:

  • Governance document requires 15-day email ballot for co-chairs
  • Action Item: Chris Carr to communicate requirement to Lab secretary the requirement in Governance document for email ballot

Teleconference Access is not always being offered for domain meetings

  • Impress upon domain secretaries that telephone access is highly advised
  • Teleconference access for detailed discussions is not optimal; committee members should be encouraged to attend face-to-face meetings; but access for votes

Next steps and New Actions Items

Domain Coordination Committee

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=IHE_Domain_Coordination_Committee_2009-04-28_Teleconference_Minutes&oldid=32776"