IHE Domain Coordination Committee 2009-04-14 Teleconference Minutes
Attendees
- Rick Butler - Eyecare Plan
- Imran Chaudhri - Eyecare Tech
- Jason Colquitt - QRPH Tech
- Todd Cooper - PCD Tech
- Bruce Curran - RO Plan
- John Donnelly - PCC Plan
- Ken Fuchs - PCD Plan
- Mike McCoy - PCC Plan
- Steve Merritt - PCD Plan
- Mike Nusbaum - ITI Plan
- Kevin O'Donnell - Rad Plan
- Charles Parisot - ITI Plan
- Karen Witting - ITI Tech
- Steve Moore - MIR
- Lisa Spellman - HIMSS
- Chris Carr - RSNA
- Nichole Drye-Mayo - RSNA
- Joan McMillen - RSNA
Minutes
General Committee Business
1. Roll Call see Roster
2. Approval of Minutes
3. New Business: from Future Agenda Topics Page
4. Review Action Items List
Domain Announcements
2. Eye Care: Profiles selected
- Legacy Acquisition Modality Actor - addition to Eye Care Workflow Profile
- Additional Order Information - addition to Eye Care Workflow Profile
- Optional extension to provide full procedure instructions (compare with JJ1017 profile; communicate with Paul Seifert)
- Department Scheduling Actor (Under Consideration - may develop the scheduling proposal as a white paper)
- EMR (Order Placer/Filler) to display schedule from practice management system; update scheduling in practice management system
- Other domains (eg, Radiology) have similar needs; profile proposal for Appointment Workflow in 2007
- Domains needing scheduling functionality may present a request to IT Infrastructure to add this to their profile development work
- A process needs to be developed to enable other domains to present their needs to ITI and collaborate on development of profiles
Domain Coordination Issues
1. R2/RO Discussion
- Tcon scheduled for Thursday 4/16, 8:00-9:00am CT
Documentation, Websites and Public Information
1. Supplement Packaging for TI and PC
- Urgent because we should get this resolved before we get too far in this cycle
- Most domains publish one supplement document for each profile containing both Volume 1 and Volume 2 material
- Eyecare and RadOnc are publishing an updated TF Volume 1 document and an updated TF Volume 2
- This may be confusing for readers (which is the Real TF) and inconvenient for reviewers (have to handle two documents for each supplement being reviewed or trial implemented)
- Is there a good reason to use this format?