IHE Domain Coordination Committee 2009-04-14 Teleconference Minutes

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attendees

  • Rick Butler - Eyecare Plan
  • Imran Chaudhri - Eyecare Tech
  • Jason Colquitt - QRPH Tech
  • Todd Cooper - PCD Tech
  • Bruce Curran - RO Plan
  • John Donnelly - PCC Plan
  • Ken Fuchs - PCD Plan
  • Mike McCoy - PCC Plan
  • Steve Merritt - PCD Plan
  • Mike Nusbaum - ITI Plan
  • Kevin O'Donnell - Rad Plan
  • Charles Parisot - ITI Plan
  • Karen Witting - ITI Tech
  • Steve Moore - MIR
  • Lisa Spellman - HIMSS
  • Chris Carr - RSNA
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo - RSNA
  • Joan McMillen - RSNA

Minutes

General Committee Business

1. Roll Call see Roster

2. Approval of Minutes

3. New Business: from Future Agenda Topics Page

4. Review Action Items List

Domain Announcements

1. Domain Milestone Dates

2. Eye Care Profiles selected for development

  • Legacy Acquisition Modality Actor to be added to Eye Care Workflow
  • Additional Order Information: Optional extension to provide full procedure instructions (compare with Mammo Rad Tech Communication profile)
  • Under Consideration: Department Scheduling Actor: EMR (Order Placer/Filler) to display schedule from practice management system; update scheduling in practice management system
  • Eye Care may develop the scheduling proposal as a white paper
  • Other domains (eg, Radiology) have similar needs; profile proposal for [Appointment Workflow] in 2007
  • Domains needing scheduling functionality may present a request to IT Infrastructure to add this to their profile development work
  • A process needs to be developed to enable other domains to present their needs to ITI and collaborate on development of profiles

Domain Coordination Issues

1. R2/RO Discussion

  • Tcon: Thursday, 8:00-9:00am CT

Documentation, Websites and Public Information

1. Supplement Packaging for TI and PC

  • Urgent because we should get this resolved before we get too far in this cycle
  • Most domains publish one supplement document for each profile containing both Volume 1 and Volume 2 material
  • Eyecare and RadOnc are publishing an updated TF Volume 1 document and an updated TF Volume 2
  • This may be confusing for readers (which is the Real TF) and inconvenient for reviewers (have to handle two documents for each supplement being reviewed or trial implemented)
  • Is there a good reason to use this format?

Governance Implementation

Next steps and New Actions Items

Domain Coordination Committee