Difference between revisions of "IHE Domain Coordination Committee 2008-09-16 Teleconference Minutes"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 86: Line 86:
 
:* Add link to summary descriptions on Website to list of profiles included in TF final text document
 
:* Add link to summary descriptions on Website to list of profiles included in TF final text document
 
:* Distinguish white papers (brainstorming) from implementation guidance documents and handbooks
 
:* Distinguish white papers (brainstorming) from implementation guidance documents and handbooks
::* '''Action Item:''' Karen will update sample ITI TF Wiki page for review on 2008-09-30 call
+
::* '''Action Item:''' Karen will update [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=ITI_Technical_Framework_webpage sample ITI TF Wiki page] for review on 2008-09-30 call
 
   
 
   
 
3. Interoperability Showcase
 
3. Interoperability Showcase

Revision as of 15:19, 16 September 2008

Attendees

  • Bruce Curran - RO Tech
  • Ana Estelrich - QRPH Plan
  • Chris Lindop - Rad Plan
  • Flora Lum, MD - Eye Care Plan
  • Mike Nusbaum - ITI Plan
  • Charles Parisot - ITI Plan
  • Karen Witting - ITI Tech
  • Steve Moore - Mallinckrodt Inst.
  • Lisa Spellman, HIMSS
  • Don Van Syckle - Eye Care
  • LaVerne Palmer, HIMSS
  • Chris Carr, RSNA
  • Joan McMillen
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA

Minutes

General Committee Business

1. Roll Call

  • Quorum not attained: meeting restricted to discussion items

2. Approval of Minutes [Deferred to 2008-09-30 tcon]

3. Schedule Future Agenda Topics for upcoming meetings

  • Add for 2008-09-30 tcon:
  • Review of Updated Supplement Template
  • Plan for soliciting participation in DCC from non-participating domains
  • Implementation Support Material: Use of INRIA Forge for Distributing WSDLs and Schema Rules in Controlled Environment

4. Review previous action items

Domain Coordination Checkpoint Announcements

  • Radiology about to publish TF rev. 9.0 as final text
  • Several domains set to publish calls for profiles

Domain Coordination Issues

1. Domain Timeline Coordination

  • Action Item: Domain Co-chairs are to fill in missing dates and estimated numbers of profiles
  • Goal is to avoid overload in publishing documents and public comment
  • PCC and ITI meeting simultaneously and publish many supplement documents in same time frame: if possible, encourage some gap between publication dates to enable interested parties to review all the documents
  • Further question for future consideration is whether there should be some limit on the number of profiles published in a given domain

2. Committee Quorums

  • Minutes of 2008-08-18 show that motion passed unanimously to set minimum Quorum for a committee at three active members (committee membership minimum is thus five members)
  • Action Item: Chris Carr to set call of domain committee secretaries to plan implementation of this rule and other issues

3. Review of definitions of R2 and RE (see discussion in 2008-08-18 minutes)

  • There is no clear distinction between the definitions provided of R2 and RE in Technical Framework documents
  • Perception of PCC, per Keith Boone, has been that RE is stricter than R2
  • No distinction has been made in testing of R2 vs. RE elements per Steve Moore
  • ITI uses both R2 and RE in PAM profile
  • IHE Radiology created R2 designation based on Type 2 requirement definition in DICOM; however, R2 is only applied to HL7 elements in Rad TF; Rad would be amenable to adopting RE definition
  • HL7 is working on refining RE definition for release of HL7 2.7 (timeline unknown)
  • Action Item: Chris Carr to coordinate a meeting of interested parties during HL7 meeting in Vancouver to resolve disagreement and confusion and develop consistent definitions to be used in all TF documents
  • Participants to include: Todd Cooper, John Moerhke, Rob Horn, Keith Boone, Francois Macary, Kevin O'Donnell
  • Remaining questions:
  • Is a "send if known" designation (R2 or RE) appropriate at all or should these elements simply be optional?
  • Is there any meaningful distinction to be made between R2 and RE?
  • Would it be useful to be more precise in defining behaviors of sending and receiving actors; perhaps including behavior of human actors?


4. HL7 Task Force Update

  • Call took place on 2008-08-28
  • Paul Seifert has submitted CP to Rad TF to fix conflict in HL7 versions and requirements for Acknowledgment Mode
  • Other Radiology-specific issues to be addressed in updating Scheduled Workflow
  • Yongjian Bao and Vassil Peytchev will begin addressing Appendix C in ITI TF to address cross-version compatibility of HL7 versions
  • Next HL7 Task Force tcon: Thurs, Sept. 28, 10-11am

Documentation, Websites and Public Information

1. Implementation support material [Deferred until quorum is available 2008-09-30]

  • Review updated implementation templates and domain implementation guide links under Implementation Guidance

2. Technical Framework Publication Page

  • Organize sections uniformly
  • ITI the most complex: use as model
  • Publish all current trial implementation supplement versions and include publication date
  • Create separate section for white papers
  • Public comment documents go on a separate page with prominent link below final text technical framework
  • Normally Technical Framework final text first; supplements second; white papers third
  • Include delta version of TI supplements linked to revision date
  • Add link to summary descriptions on Website to list of profiles included in TF final text document
  • Distinguish white papers (brainstorming) from implementation guidance documents and handbooks

3. Interoperability Showcase

  • John Donnelly solicits input via email from Domain Co-chairs about what profiles they would like to see featured in Showcase
  • Action Item: Domain Planning Co-chairs to email John Donnelly priority profiles for demonstration

4. Recruitment message for clinicians to participate in Domain Committees [Defer to 2008-09-30]

  • Action Item: Chris Carr will distribute recruiting message for review and comment by committee

Governance Implementation

1. Vote on proposal to change the way the pluses are used in rosters for voting purposes.

2. ITI notes on implementing governance in domain committees

  • Review and consider for adoption across domain committee process for presentation and evaluation of profile proposals

3. Roadmap Development

  • Discuss method for strategic planning exercise to develop Roadmap
  • How to reflect strategic direction of Board
  • Have well-defined process and reference document for 2008-2009 publication cycle
  • Include coordination among domain (eg, for ITI, QRPH)
  • Action Item: Mike Nusbaum will circulate generalized approach for brainstorming strategic issues

4. IHE Membership Requirements

  • Action Item: Each Committee Secretary to update roster for next meeting and work with cochairs to remind/encourage laggard members.

Next Tcon

  • Tues., 2008-09-30, 10-11:30am CDT

Domain Coordination Committee