Difference between revisions of "GDC Minutes 2020-12-02"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Welcome == * Participants :* Jürgen Brandstätter :* Tie Tjee :* Vince McCauley :* Stephane Spahni * Approval of agenda :* Approved == National Deployment Committees ==...") |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:* Approved | :* Approved | ||
| + | * [https://ihe.webex.com/ihe/ldr.php?RCID=12335b4ecbe644e2a111f704daf71674 Meeting Recording 2020-12-02] | ||
== National Deployment Committees == | == National Deployment Committees == | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
* Discussion | * Discussion | ||
:* Jürgen: Yes, has not approved in terms of numbers of participants, but we now have people in the loop, which were not there before (Aus, Kor, Jap) | :* Jürgen: Yes, has not approved in terms of numbers of participants, but we now have people in the loop, which were not there before (Aus, Kor, Jap) | ||
| − | :* Vince: The staggering is important, because otherwise Australia could never have been present. Participation of Asia was quite ok all of the time. | + | :* Vince: The staggering is important, because otherwise Australia could never have been present. Participation of Asia was quite ok all of the time in the Asian-friendly calls. |
:* Stephane: The US calls have same attendance as before, so in total it's even a slight increase in number of partipcation | :* Stephane: The US calls have same attendance as before, so in total it's even a slight increase in number of partipcation | ||
| − | :* All: Much more diverse participation (in people and countries) | + | :* All: Much more diverse participation with the staggered schedule (in terms of people and countries) |
:* Tie: Number of partipication is not a matter of the schedule -> we need topics to increase participation (problem-based approach) | :* Tie: Number of partipication is not a matter of the schedule -> we need topics to increase participation (problem-based approach) | ||
| − | :* All: The staggered schedule is "enabling" participation better as the | + | :* All: The staggered schedule is "enabling" participation better as the schedule before |
:* '''Unanimously conclusion: let's keep the staggered schedule''' | :* '''Unanimously conclusion: let's keep the staggered schedule''' | ||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
* General to work-items | * General to work-items | ||
:* Result of: Confirmation of work-item approvals with whole GDC committee by email (Jürgen) | :* Result of: Confirmation of work-item approvals with whole GDC committee by email (Jürgen) | ||
| − | :* '''Decision: Work-items have had a turnaround through regions | + | :* '''Decision: Work-items have had a turnaround through regions without any objections -> they are approved''' |
| + | |||
* Work item: '''Interesting presentations could be included in the agenda on a regular basis''' | * Work item: '''Interesting presentations could be included in the agenda on a regular basis''' | ||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
::* Expected result: more participation in GDC calls | ::* Expected result: more participation in GDC calls | ||
:* Process: Call for presentations to DCs -> make long-term presentation schedule -> do proper advertising and invite (also board) | :* Process: Call for presentations to DCs -> make long-term presentation schedule -> do proper advertising and invite (also board) | ||
| − | :* Status work item | + | :* Status work item: Active |
| − | + | :* '''Decision on process:''' | |
| − | |||
::* Step 1: Prominent announcement of the presentation slot (mentioning the GDC call) to GDC and Board | ::* Step 1: Prominent announcement of the presentation slot (mentioning the GDC call) to GDC and Board | ||
::* Step 2: Presentations given once (in just one GCD call) | ::* Step 2: Presentations given once (in just one GCD call) | ||
| Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
::* Step 4: Replay presentation in the complementary slot (where the presenting region is not attending) | ::* Step 4: Replay presentation in the complementary slot (where the presenting region is not attending) | ||
::* Step 5: Enlist presentation in a "libarary of presentations" on GDC Wiki | ::* Step 5: Enlist presentation in a "libarary of presentations" on GDC Wiki | ||
| − | :* Presentation slots to be scheduled: | + | :* '''Presentation slots to be scheduled:''' |
::* European X-eHealth project is strategically important for Europe, but other regions would be interested in follow-up | ::* European X-eHealth project is strategically important for Europe, but other regions would be interested in follow-up | ||
:::* Decision: regular presentations on the project course desired (Jürgen) | :::* Decision: regular presentations on the project course desired (Jürgen) | ||
| Line 64: | Line 65: | ||
* Work item: '''Activity measurements''' | * Work item: '''Activity measurements''' | ||
:* Purpose: Find activity measurements (fees, reporting, ...) for distinguishing active from passive Deployment Committees and find a concept for Deployment Committees not paying their membership fees | :* Purpose: Find activity measurements (fees, reporting, ...) for distinguishing active from passive Deployment Committees and find a concept for Deployment Committees not paying their membership fees | ||
| − | :* Status work item | + | :* Status work item: On hold - waiting for IHE Europe input, results brought to this group as base for staring the work-item |
| − | : | ||
:* Status Action Items | :* Status Action Items | ||
::* Report IHE Europe status and outcomes (Jürgen) | ::* Report IHE Europe status and outcomes (Jürgen) | ||
| + | :::* Skipped due to time | ||
| + | |||
* Work item: '''How can we support national Deployment Committees?''' | * Work item: '''How can we support national Deployment Committees?''' | ||
:* "Good experiences" is an important way to support, develop a guideline of success factors, any help regarding getting membership | :* "Good experiences" is an important way to support, develop a guideline of success factors, any help regarding getting membership | ||
::* e.g., by setting up work-items/activities/etc. on International level, which are "so interesting" for countries, to that they can use it to advertise local membership | ::* e.g., by setting up work-items/activities/etc. on International level, which are "so interesting" for countries, to that they can use it to advertise local membership | ||
| − | :* Status work item | + | :* Status work item: On hold - waiting for IHE Europe input, results brought to this group as base for staring the work-item::* Pending confirmation |
| − | : | ||
:* Status Action Items | :* Status Action Items | ||
::* Report IHE Europe status and outcomes (Jürgen) | ::* Report IHE Europe status and outcomes (Jürgen) | ||
| + | :::* Skipped due to time | ||
| + | |||
* Work item: '''Sharpening the role and purpose of Deployment Committees''' | * Work item: '''Sharpening the role and purpose of Deployment Committees''' | ||
:* Purpose: Upgrade the governance document, not sure, if hard constraints can be applied, but at least some more guidance, what we expect from a Deployment Committee | :* Purpose: Upgrade the governance document, not sure, if hard constraints can be applied, but at least some more guidance, what we expect from a Deployment Committee | ||
| − | :* Status work item | + | :* Status work item: Not started yet due to bandwidth - pending other work-items to finish first |
| − | : | ||
| − | |||
| Line 87: | Line 88: | ||
* AeHIN Meeting (virtual): "Strengthening Regional Health Systems Response to COVID-19: Digital Health Experiences in Asia" | * AeHIN Meeting (virtual): "Strengthening Regional Health Systems Response to COVID-19: Digital Health Experiences in Asia" | ||
:* Schedule: January 7, 14, 21, and 28, 2021 (every Thursday of January 2021 at 7:00-9:00 pm Manila time). | :* Schedule: January 7, 14, 21, and 28, 2021 (every Thursday of January 2021 at 7:00-9:00 pm Manila time). | ||
| − | :* [ | + | :* [https://www.asiaehealthinformationnetwork.org Link] |
* Report out of Netherlands (Tie) | * Report out of Netherlands (Tie) | ||
| − | :* Developments in other sectors: Netherland's "Forum standardization" | + | :* Developments in other sectors: Netherland's "Forum standardization" [https://forumstandaardisatie.nl/netherlands-standardisation-forum Link] |
::* Led by the Ministry of Economic affairs, ALL ministries involved | ::* Led by the Ministry of Economic affairs, ALL ministries involved | ||
::* Director of that forum was at IHE EU Connectathon in Den Haag and said "I was inspired" | ::* Director of that forum was at IHE EU Connectathon in Den Haag and said "I was inspired" | ||
::* Invited Tie to present the IHE methodology in front of all sectors (session is next week) | ::* Invited Tie to present the IHE methodology in front of all sectors (session is next week) | ||
| − | ::* | + | ::* Forum wants to investigate if they should embrace the IHE methodology too and propagate this to all sectors |
| + | :* Second event from the Ministry of Economic Affairs: "Conference Nederland Digital Strategy 2021" | ||
| + | ::* Tie was approached by the Senior Policy Advisor for Digital Economy, that he discovered that 'interoperability' was missing as topic in the programme. | ||
| + | ::* He discussed it within the Programme Committee and they agreed to add 'interoperability' | ||
| + | ::* IHE The Netherlands is asked to organise this track | ||
| + | ::* Due to the enormous amount of proposed sessions, they are now doing a selection - so we are close, but not definitive in the programme | ||
| + | ::* Interesting: The results of the sessions will be bundled and offered to the Parliament! | ||
| + | ::* Period: end January/begin February | ||
| + | |||
Latest revision as of 01:54, 3 December 2020
Welcome
- Participants
- Jürgen Brandstätter
- Tie Tjee
- Vince McCauley
- Stephane Spahni
- Approval of agenda
- Approved
National Deployment Committees
- New Reports
- Waiting for representation from IHE Germany to present report
Discuss 2021 meeting schedule
- Participation is reportedly low with staggered schedule meant to accommodate various regions/time zones
- Discussion
- Jürgen: Yes, has not approved in terms of numbers of participants, but we now have people in the loop, which were not there before (Aus, Kor, Jap)
- Vince: The staggering is important, because otherwise Australia could never have been present. Participation of Asia was quite ok all of the time in the Asian-friendly calls.
- Stephane: The US calls have same attendance as before, so in total it's even a slight increase in number of partipcation
- All: Much more diverse participation with the staggered schedule (in terms of people and countries)
- Tie: Number of partipication is not a matter of the schedule -> we need topics to increase participation (problem-based approach)
- All: The staggered schedule is "enabling" participation better as the schedule before
- Unanimously conclusion: let's keep the staggered schedule
Global Consortium for eHealth Interoperability Update
- Status
- Vince: Nominations for the committees feel pretty US-centric. There is no Asian participation at all, hardly few from Europe
- Tie: ad strategic members: the consortium must provide benefits to those strategic members. Also lookout for other sectors.
- Messages to the consortium (Jürgen forwards to GCeHI EB)
- Make sure that it's nominations to committees are "international"
Engagement of Deployment Committees
- General to work-items
- Result of: Confirmation of work-item approvals with whole GDC committee by email (Jürgen)
- Decision: Work-items have had a turnaround through regions without any objections -> they are approved
- Work item: Interesting presentations could be included in the agenda on a regular basis
- Purpose: "US/Asia/Europe slots" for such presentations of "interesting topic of the country" (maybe 3/6 times a year)
- Expected result: more participation in GDC calls
- Process: Call for presentations to DCs -> make long-term presentation schedule -> do proper advertising and invite (also board)
- Status work item: Active
- Decision on process:
- Step 1: Prominent announcement of the presentation slot (mentioning the GDC call) to GDC and Board
- Step 2: Presentations given once (in just one GCD call)
- Step 3: Presentation will be cut out of the general recording and advertised for offline viewing in dedicated emails to the GDC and Board
- Step 4: Replay presentation in the complementary slot (where the presenting region is not attending)
- Step 5: Enlist presentation in a "libarary of presentations" on GDC Wiki
- Presentation slots to be scheduled:
- European X-eHealth project is strategically important for Europe, but other regions would be interested in follow-up
- Decision: regular presentations on the project course desired (Jürgen)
- Action item: Prepare presentation for February slot (Jürgen)
- Australia: National approach to Health IT Standards selection (Vince)
- Action item: Prepare presentation for March slot (Vince)
- Work item: Activity measurements
- Purpose: Find activity measurements (fees, reporting, ...) for distinguishing active from passive Deployment Committees and find a concept for Deployment Committees not paying their membership fees
- Status work item: On hold - waiting for IHE Europe input, results brought to this group as base for staring the work-item
- Status Action Items
- Report IHE Europe status and outcomes (Jürgen)
- Skipped due to time
- Work item: How can we support national Deployment Committees?
- "Good experiences" is an important way to support, develop a guideline of success factors, any help regarding getting membership
- e.g., by setting up work-items/activities/etc. on International level, which are "so interesting" for countries, to that they can use it to advertise local membership
- Status work item: On hold - waiting for IHE Europe input, results brought to this group as base for staring the work-item::* Pending confirmation
- Status Action Items
- Report IHE Europe status and outcomes (Jürgen)
- Skipped due to time
- Work item: Sharpening the role and purpose of Deployment Committees
- Purpose: Upgrade the governance document, not sure, if hard constraints can be applied, but at least some more guidance, what we expect from a Deployment Committee
- Status work item: Not started yet due to bandwidth - pending other work-items to finish first
Any other business
- AeHIN Meeting (virtual): "Strengthening Regional Health Systems Response to COVID-19: Digital Health Experiences in Asia"
- Schedule: January 7, 14, 21, and 28, 2021 (every Thursday of January 2021 at 7:00-9:00 pm Manila time).
- Link
- Report out of Netherlands (Tie)
- Developments in other sectors: Netherland's "Forum standardization" Link
- Led by the Ministry of Economic affairs, ALL ministries involved
- Director of that forum was at IHE EU Connectathon in Den Haag and said "I was inspired"
- Invited Tie to present the IHE methodology in front of all sectors (session is next week)
- Forum wants to investigate if they should embrace the IHE methodology too and propagate this to all sectors
- Second event from the Ministry of Economic Affairs: "Conference Nederland Digital Strategy 2021"
- Tie was approached by the Senior Policy Advisor for Digital Economy, that he discovered that 'interoperability' was missing as topic in the programme.
- He discussed it within the Programme Committee and they agreed to add 'interoperability'
- IHE The Netherlands is asked to organise this track
- Due to the enormous amount of proposed sessions, they are now doing a selection - so we are close, but not definitive in the programme
- Interesting: The results of the sessions will be bundled and offered to the Parliament!
- Period: end January/begin February
Next meeting
- Wednesday, January 6th, 06:00-07:00pm CT (US/Asia friendly)