GDC Minutes 2020-12-02

From IHE Wiki
Revision as of 04:35, 2 December 2020 by Juergenbrandstaetter (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Welcome == * Participants :* Jürgen Brandstätter :* Tie Tjee :* Vince McCauley :* Stephane Spahni * Approval of agenda :* Approved == National Deployment Committees ==...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome

  • Participants
  • Jürgen Brandstätter
  • Tie Tjee
  • Vince McCauley
  • Stephane Spahni
  • Approval of agenda
  • Approved


National Deployment Committees

  • New Reports
  • Waiting for representation from IHE Germany to present report


Discuss 2021 meeting schedule

  • Participation is reportedly low with staggered schedule meant to accommodate various regions/time zones
  • Discussion
  • Jürgen: Yes, has not approved in terms of numbers of participants, but we now have people in the loop, which were not there before (Aus, Kor, Jap)
  • Vince: The staggering is important, because otherwise Australia could never have been present. Participation of Asia was quite ok all of the time.
  • Stephane: The US calls have same attendance as before, so in total it's even a slight increase in number of partipcation
  • All: Much more diverse participation (in people and countries)
  • Tie: Number of partipication is not a matter of the schedule -> we need topics to increase participation (problem-based approach)
  • All: The staggered schedule is "enabling" participation better as the one before
  • Unanimously conclusion: let's keep the staggered schedule


Global Consortium for eHealth Interoperability Update

  • Status
  • Vince: Nominations for the committees feel pretty US-centric. There is no Asian participation at all, hardly few from Europe
  • Tie: ad strategic members: the consortium must provide benefits to those strategic members. Also lookout for other sectors.
  • Messages to the consortium (Jürgen forwards to GCeHI EB)
  • Make sure that it's nominations to committees are "international"


Engagement of Deployment Committees

  • General to work-items
  • Result of: Confirmation of work-item approvals with whole GDC committee by email (Jürgen)
  • Decision: Work-items have had a turnaround through regions with objections -> they are approved
  • Work item: Interesting presentations could be included in the agenda on a regular basis
  • Purpose: "US/Asia/Europe slots" for such presentations of "interesting topic of the country" (maybe 3/6 times a year)
  • Expected result: more participation in GDC calls
  • Process: Call for presentations to DCs -> make long-term presentation schedule -> do proper advertising and invite (also board)
  • Status work item
  • Active
  • Process:
  • Step 1: Prominent announcement of the presentation slot (mentioning the GDC call) to GDC and Board
  • Step 2: Presentations given once (in just one GCD call)
  • Step 3: Presentation will be cut out of the general recording and advertised for offline viewing in dedicated emails to the GDC and Board
  • Step 4: Replay presentation in the complementary slot (where the presenting region is not attending)
  • Step 5: Enlist presentation in a "libarary of presentations" on GDC Wiki
  • Presentation slots to be scheduled:
  • European X-eHealth project is strategically important for Europe, but other regions would be interested in follow-up
  • Decision: regular presentations on the project course desired (Jürgen)
  • Action item: Prepare presentation for February slot (Jürgen)
  • Australia: National approach to Health IT Standards selection (Vince)
  • Action item: Prepare presentation for March slot (Vince)


  • Work item: Activity measurements
  • Purpose: Find activity measurements (fees, reporting, ...) for distinguishing active from passive Deployment Committees and find a concept for Deployment Committees not paying their membership fees
  • Status work item
  • On hold waiting for IHE Europe input, results brought to this group as base for staring the work-item
  • Status Action Items
  • Report IHE Europe status and outcomes (Jürgen)
  • Work item: How can we support national Deployment Committees?
  • "Good experiences" is an important way to support, develop a guideline of success factors, any help regarding getting membership
  • e.g., by setting up work-items/activities/etc. on International level, which are "so interesting" for countries, to that they can use it to advertise local membership
  • Status work item
  • On hold waiting for IHE Europe input, results brought to this group as base for staring the work-item::* Pending confirmation
  • Status Action Items
  • Report IHE Europe status and outcomes (Jürgen)
  • Work item: Sharpening the role and purpose of Deployment Committees
  • Purpose: Upgrade the governance document, not sure, if hard constraints can be applied, but at least some more guidance, what we expect from a Deployment Committee
  • Status work item
  • Not started yet due to bandwidth, pending other work-items to finish first
  • Pending confirmation


Any other business

  • AeHIN Meeting (virtual): "Strengthening Regional Health Systems Response to COVID-19: Digital Health Experiences in Asia"
  • Report out of Netherlands (Tie)
  • Developments in other sectors: Netherland's "Forum standardization"
  • Led by the Ministry of Economic affairs, ALL ministries involved
  • Director of that forum was at IHE EU Connectathon in Den Haag and said "I was inspired"
  • Invited Tie to present the IHE methodology in front of all sectors (session is next week)
  • Clear indication that the methodology shall be applied to all sectors (not only eHealth)


Next meeting

  • Wednesday, January 6th, 06:00-07:00pm CT (US/Asia friendly)


Global Deployment Coordination Committee