Difference between revisions of "GDC Agenda 2021-03-03"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Special Presentation == | == Special Presentation == | ||
| − | * '''Guideline | + | * '''IHE Guideline Transmural Multidisciplinary Consultation Oncology (Tie Tjee)''' |
:* In IHE The Netherlands we started a Working Group in which the primary healthcare process is the leading principle, instead of developing an IHE profile. The reason to do this approach is, that we wanted to connect in a better way with the layer of healthcare professionals. Our basics are the multilayer model of interoperability. By telling the healthcare professionals that their process will be leading for the supporting layers, they will be eager to join this working group. We connected with NABON (National Breast cancer Consultation Netherlands: national multidisciplinary consultation body of healthcare professionals which are involved in the diagnostics and treatment of breast cancer) and SONCOS (the same topic but now in the context of professional associations). These bodies just finalized their professional guideline and we’re actually stuck at the point “how do we come to the phase that their guidelines are implemented in the systems they are using?” It is now interesting to see what the impact was of this approach in terms of adoption of this IHE Guideline by the MoH, the Association of Healthcare Insurance companies, the vendors and the awareness at the healthcare professionals that the IHE methodology helps them to come to interoperable solutions based on standards. | :* In IHE The Netherlands we started a Working Group in which the primary healthcare process is the leading principle, instead of developing an IHE profile. The reason to do this approach is, that we wanted to connect in a better way with the layer of healthcare professionals. Our basics are the multilayer model of interoperability. By telling the healthcare professionals that their process will be leading for the supporting layers, they will be eager to join this working group. We connected with NABON (National Breast cancer Consultation Netherlands: national multidisciplinary consultation body of healthcare professionals which are involved in the diagnostics and treatment of breast cancer) and SONCOS (the same topic but now in the context of professional associations). These bodies just finalized their professional guideline and we’re actually stuck at the point “how do we come to the phase that their guidelines are implemented in the systems they are using?” It is now interesting to see what the impact was of this approach in terms of adoption of this IHE Guideline by the MoH, the Association of Healthcare Insurance companies, the vendors and the awareness at the healthcare professionals that the IHE methodology helps them to come to interoperable solutions based on standards. | ||
Revision as of 11:49, 24 February 2021
Welcome
- Participants
- Approval of agenda
- Permission to record this session
National Deployment Committees
- No reports available to be presented this month
- Discussion: remind GDC members whose reports are past due
Global Consortium for eHealth Interoperability Update
- Status (only if Jürgen Brandstätter or Didi Davis are present)
Special Presentation
- IHE Guideline Transmural Multidisciplinary Consultation Oncology (Tie Tjee)
- In IHE The Netherlands we started a Working Group in which the primary healthcare process is the leading principle, instead of developing an IHE profile. The reason to do this approach is, that we wanted to connect in a better way with the layer of healthcare professionals. Our basics are the multilayer model of interoperability. By telling the healthcare professionals that their process will be leading for the supporting layers, they will be eager to join this working group. We connected with NABON (National Breast cancer Consultation Netherlands: national multidisciplinary consultation body of healthcare professionals which are involved in the diagnostics and treatment of breast cancer) and SONCOS (the same topic but now in the context of professional associations). These bodies just finalized their professional guideline and we’re actually stuck at the point “how do we come to the phase that their guidelines are implemented in the systems they are using?” It is now interesting to see what the impact was of this approach in terms of adoption of this IHE Guideline by the MoH, the Association of Healthcare Insurance companies, the vendors and the awareness at the healthcare professionals that the IHE methodology helps them to come to interoperable solutions based on standards.
- Future Presentations and tentative schedule:
- Apr (Asia/US): (potential) Sequoia Image Exchange (Didi)
- Action item: Asking Didi (Chris)
- May (US/EU): IHE Methodology applied cross-sector in The Netherlands (Tie)
- Jun (EU/Asia): AI and Interoperability for Radiology and Pathology in UK (Dewinder)
- Jul (Asia/US): IHE USA cooperative agreement with ONC to advance FHIR (Joyce)
- Aug (US/EU): eGabon National HIE with World Bank - Projectathon (Charles)
- Sep (EU/Asia): European X-eHealth, April slot (Jürgen)
- Oct (Asia/US): Australia: National approach to Health IT Standards selection, March slot (Vince)
- Nov (US/EU): Greek National eHealth Information Framework - Projectathon (Charles)
- Dec (EU/Asia):
Open Forum (informal information sharing)
Any other business
Next meeting
- Wednesday, April 7 2021, 6:00-7:00pm CT (US / Asia friendly time)