Difference between revisions of "Final Text Process"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Run down the checklist for each profile | * Run down the checklist for each profile | ||
− | ** | + | ** Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions? |
− | ** | + | ** Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon? |
− | ** | + | ** Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested? |
− | ** | + | ** Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon? |
− | ** | + | ** Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile? |
+ | ** Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT? | ||
+ | ** Have at least one of each actor been released in the market (but Vendors may not want to publish integration statement if it’s not FT)? | ||
** ?? Have any complaints been raised against the profile ?? | ** ?? Have any complaints been raised against the profile ?? | ||
− | ** Are there any outstanding CPs against the profile | + | ** Are there any outstanding CPs against the profile? |
* Debate exceptions (failure of the above is cause for discussion) | * Debate exceptions (failure of the above is cause for discussion) |
Revision as of 10:57, 4 April 2007
<Note: All Process pages are very much Strawman documents>
At some point, a Trial Implementation supplement will be ready for consideration as a Final Text candidate.
- Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda (April-May)
- scheduling pre-requisite: after Public Comment resolution meeting (March)
- input pre-requisite: Deal with CPs against the profile.
- input pre-requisite: after Connectathons (NA=Jan, EU=Apr)
- Announce intention to review for Final Text (announce in mid-Feb)
- Run down the checklist for each profile
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- Have at least one of each actor been released in the market (but Vendors may not want to publish integration statement if it’s not FT)?
- ?? Have any complaints been raised against the profile ??
- Are there any outstanding CPs against the profile?
- Debate exceptions (failure of the above is cause for discussion)
- Hold and record formal vote
- Communicate results to TC
Tech Cmte.
- Prepare Final Text Supplement
- Publish Final Text on ihe.net
- Announce publication
<Discuss whether you can put an Integration Statement up for a TI Profile? Would need to review and either remove IS or change implementation based on Final Text>