Difference between revisions of "Final Text Process"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
* Run down the checklist for each profile
 
* Run down the checklist for each profile
** has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions
+
** Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
** has the profile been tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon.
+
** Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
** have the standards underlying the profile been previously implemented in a system/product in our domain (expand on the issue of testing the standard and testing the profile)
+
** Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
** has each actor in the profile been implemented independently at least twice
+
** Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
** have at least one of each actor been released in the market (but Vendors may not want to publish integration statement if it’s not FT)
+
** Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
 +
** Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
 +
** Have at least one of each actor been released in the market (but Vendors may not want to publish integration statement if it’s not FT)?
 
** ?? Have any complaints been raised against the profile ??
 
** ?? Have any complaints been raised against the profile ??
** Are there any outstanding CPs against the profile  
+
** Are there any outstanding CPs against the profile?
  
 
* Debate exceptions (failure of the above is cause for discussion)
 
* Debate exceptions (failure of the above is cause for discussion)

Revision as of 10:57, 4 April 2007

<Note: All Process pages are very much Strawman documents>

At some point, a Trial Implementation supplement will be ready for consideration as a Final Text candidate.

  • Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda (April-May)
    • scheduling pre-requisite: after Public Comment resolution meeting (March)
    • input pre-requisite: Deal with CPs against the profile.
    • input pre-requisite: after Connectathons (NA=Jan, EU=Apr)
  • Announce intention to review for Final Text (announce in mid-Feb)
  • Run down the checklist for each profile
    • Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
    • Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
    • Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
    • Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
    • Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
    • Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
    • Have at least one of each actor been released in the market (but Vendors may not want to publish integration statement if it’s not FT)?
    • ?? Have any complaints been raised against the profile ??
    • Are there any outstanding CPs against the profile?
  • Debate exceptions (failure of the above is cause for discussion)
  • Hold and record formal vote
  • Communicate results to TC

Tech Cmte.

  • Prepare Final Text Supplement
  • Publish Final Text on ihe.net
  • Announce publication

<Discuss whether you can put an Integration Statement up for a TI Profile? Would need to review and either remove IS or change implementation based on Final Text>