Difference between revisions of "Evaluation of Invoke Image Display"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
 
* Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
  
−
There is one outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349) that suggests adding "close" and "logout" commands in the API.
+
There is one outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349) that suggests adding "close" and "logout" commands in the API. This CP might be related to security. Need to review.
  
 
See [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TmSwnn4AIiXqFLc_AtzP0dNd9LUWnA-ZcCjBMKpLzp4/edit#gid=0 CP Tracking Spreadsheet]
 
See [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TmSwnn4AIiXqFLc_AtzP0dNd9LUWnA-ZcCjBMKpLzp4/edit#gid=0 CP Tracking Spreadsheet]

Revision as of 09:59, 4 May 2016

Profile wiki page: Invoke Image Display

Technical Committee Evaluation (Preliminary answers)

Answers to the following checklist for IID

  • Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?

There is one outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349) that suggests adding "close" and "logout" commands in the API. This CP might be related to security. Need to review.

See CP Tracking Spreadsheet

  • Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?

Yes

  • Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?

Yes. Need to review the newly submitted CP from Marco.

  • Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?

Yes

  • Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?

Yes

Informal feedback gathering only

  • Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?

Yes.

  • Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
  • Record checklist findings and debate conclusion

Planning Committee Consensus (Preliminary answers)

  • Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?

Yes. Tested in Bochum 2016, NA 2016, NA 2015, Vienna 2014

Connectathon test results summary

  • Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?

Yes.

  • Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?

Yes.

  • Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?

No option defined.

  • Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?

No.

  • Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?

Yes. HTTP(S) URL is widely used.

  • (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)

Yes.

  • Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?

One outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349)

David has already created one Invoke Image Display

  • Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
  • Record checklist findings and conclusions of the debate in your meeting minutes
Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Evaluation_of_Invoke_Image_Display&oldid=94433"