EduCom Minutes 2019-05-03
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Agenda
Welcome
- Participants
- Jürgen Brandstätter
- Alexander Ihls
- Charles Parisot
- Werner Henschelchen
- Jamie Dulkowski
- Review and Approve Agenda
- Approved
Exam status update
- Report on operation, # of exam takers, issues, etc. (Jürgen, Werner)
- So far one exam passed: Charles Parisot is the first :) (consent given for publication in these minutes)
- Charles's feedback:
- Registration for the exam
- Process is complex and has gaps, several different websites (GASQ, ProctorU, Exam site) involved
- Since price is given as "netto" price (which cannot be changed), the registration process ends up with more money to be paid after taxes are applied -> this can be received as a bad surprise
- Action item: Wording on ihe.net website and in registratino process shall be enhanced, so that there is no "bad surprise" effect
- Exam itself
- Timing: 30min for Charles out of 1 hour -> seems to be ok
- Out of 40 questions:
- 14 questions needed deeper analysis
- Question/answers were unclear, ambiguous or mulitple answers could work or answers were not clear
- Comments were given in the exam as comments
- Only 4 out of the 5 sections of the Syllabus were covered by the exam questions
- Alexander: Questions for all sections are available, must be a randomizing or structuring issue in the exam
- Issue resolution
- Issue received about "Pin", which is asked, but not given. Reason was bad wording in GASQ registration email, reported to be fixed now
- Fixed
- Issue not fixed yet: There are things to do on the GASQ website, which have to be done first (registering and paying) in order to do the exam -> instructions are not complete
- Action item: GASQ to review the instructions by following the instructions (starting from the IHE website) and remove all gaps (Werner)
- Refer to Charles's emails from April 30, 23:25 and the ones resent on May 3rd, 15:25 and May 3rd, 15:28
- Feedback given on exam (see above)
- Action item: Process feedback on exam (Werner, Exam question group)
- Feedback loop
- A feedback look is required to debug the exam
- Certain experts could be asked for sitting the exam and give feedback
- They shall be given instructions, how to provide the feedback
- Action item: Education Committee shall search and ask experts (Jürgen)
Logo
- General FTP folder: Logo
- Formal decision on logo colors: Logo colors
- Decision: Based on the offline voting between blue and red, the final logo is the "blue" one
- Action item: Finalize logo (web version, print version, etc.) (Chris)
- including putting logo on website and transfer logo to Werner for finalization of certificate
Certificate
- General FTP folder: Certificates
- First draft version of certifiate
- Logo and feedback on Exam certificate has been/will be provided to Werner
- Action item: Provide second version of certificate based on logo and input given so far (Werner)
Processes Document
- General FTP folder: Processes
- Status and review of additions
- Clarification on the question: Who is the highest authority on the certificate?
- Option 1: GASQ (or any equivalent exam provider) is the highest authority for issuing certificates, which are all equivalent according the the agreed scheme of IHE
- Option 2: IHE is the highest authority for issuing certificates, and the exam providers are "just" the fulfillers and delivery of the certificate to the person
- Answer: According the ISO Standards it's option 1
- If you have an issue with your current exam, the exam provider is responsible for all issues (but acting on behalf of IHE)
- That's why the certificate is branded with the exam provider
- Even includes that in case of re-certification at another exam provider instead of the first one, this is seamless possible and does not break the "certified since ..." chain
- Most recent version: Version 0.18_JB3
- Action item: Provide next version of process document based on comments given (Werner)
Accreditation of training providers
- Status and next steps
- Interested:
- University of Applied Sciences, Austria
- ZTG, Germany
- No action possible, because waiting for process to be finished
Any other business
- None
Next call
- Thursday, May 16, 8am - 9am CT (15:00 - 16:00 Vienna time)