Difference between revisions of "Digital Pathology Aid for Nephrology"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(This page contains a draft with the main contents of this profile proposal.)
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
==1. Proposed Workitem: ''Digital Pathology Aid for Nephrology''==
 
==1. Proposed Workitem: ''Digital Pathology Aid for Nephrology''==
  
* Proposal Editor: ''Francesca Vanzo''
+
* Proposal Editor: ''Francesca Vanzo?''
 
* Editor: ''Francesca Vanzo, ...''  
 
* Editor: ''Francesca Vanzo, ...''  
 
* Date:    N/A (Wiki keeps history)
 
* Date:    N/A (Wiki keeps history)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
   
 
   
 
[[Category:DomainAbbreviation]]
 
[[Category:DomainAbbreviation]]
 
  
 
==2. The Problem==
 
==2. The Problem==
Line 28: Line 27:
  
 
==4. Standards and Systems==
 
==4. Standards and Systems==
 +
Standards:
 +
DICOM, HL7
  
''<List existing systems that are/could be involved in the problem/solution.>''
+
IHE Profiles:
 +
XDS-I.b, XDS, ATNA
  
''<If known, list standards which might be relevant to the solution>''
+
Other components: Digital Slide Scanners, Pathology LIS
  
 
==5. Discussion==
 
==5. Discussion==

Latest revision as of 03:58, 9 October 2020


1. Proposed Workitem: Digital Pathology Aid for Nephrology

  • Proposal Editor: Francesca Vanzo?
  • Editor: Francesca Vanzo, ...
  • Date: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
  • Version: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
  • Domain: Pathology and Laboratory in Medicine

2. The Problem

<Summarize the integration problem. What doesn’t work, or what needs to work.>


<Now describe the Value Statement: what is the underlying cost incurred by the problem, what is to be gained by solving it>

3. Key Use Case

<Describe a short use case scenario from the user perspective. The use case should demonstrate the integration/workflow problem.>

<Feel free to add a second use case scenario demonstrating how it “should” work. Try to indicate the people/systems, the tasks they are doing, the information they need, and hopefully where the information should come from.>


4. Standards and Systems

Standards: DICOM, HL7

IHE Profiles: XDS-I.b, XDS, ATNA

Other components: Digital Slide Scanners, Pathology LIS

5. Discussion

<Include additional discussion or consider a few details which might be useful for the detailed proposal>

<Why IHE would be a good venue to solve the problem and what you think IHE should do to solve it.>
<What might the IHE technical approach be? Existing Actors? New Transactions? Additional Profiles?>
<What are some of the risks or open issues to be addressed?>