Difference between revisions of "Digital Pathology Aid for Nephrology"
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==4. Standards and Systems== | ==4. Standards and Systems== | ||
Standards: | Standards: | ||
− | DICOM | + | DICOM, HL7 |
− | HL7 | ||
IHE Profiles: | IHE Profiles: | ||
− | XDS-I.b | + | XDS-I.b, XDS, ATNA |
− | XDS | ||
− | ATNA | ||
− | Digital Slide Scanners | + | Other components:Digital Slide Scanners, Pathology LIS |
− | Pathology LIS | ||
==5. Discussion== | ==5. Discussion== |
Revision as of 09:27, 8 October 2020
1. Proposed Workitem: Digital Pathology Aid for Nephrology
- Proposal Editor: Francesca Vanzo
- Editor: Francesca Vanzo, ...
- Date: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
- Version: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
- Domain: Pathology and Laboratory in Medicine
2. The Problem
<Summarize the integration problem. What doesn’t work, or what needs to work.>
<Now describe the Value Statement: what is the underlying cost incurred by the problem, what is to be gained by solving it>
3. Key Use Case
<Describe a short use case scenario from the user perspective. The use case should demonstrate the integration/workflow problem.>
<Feel free to add a second use case scenario demonstrating how it “should” work. Try to indicate the people/systems, the tasks they are doing, the information they need, and hopefully where the information should come from.>
4. Standards and Systems
Standards: DICOM, HL7
IHE Profiles: XDS-I.b, XDS, ATNA
Other components:Digital Slide Scanners, Pathology LIS
5. Discussion
<Include additional discussion or consider a few details which might be useful for the detailed proposal>
- <Why IHE would be a good venue to solve the problem and what you think IHE should do to solve it.>
- <What might the IHE technical approach be? Existing Actors? New Transactions? Additional Profiles?>
- <What are some of the risks or open issues to be addressed?>