Difference between revisions of "DEV Domain F2F Apr 2021 Webex"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(79 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
+
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive 2021]]
[[Category:DEV Meeting]]
+
[[Category:DEV Meeting Archive 2021]]
  
Paul Sherman, PCD TPM
+
Paul Sherman and Michael J. Kirwan, DEV Domain TPM's
  
 
== Meeting Objectives ==
 
== Meeting Objectives ==
  
: These face-to-face meetings have a number of objectives depending on the committees involved:
+
: These face-to-face meetings have a number of objectives depending on the programs and committees involved:
 
:* '''DEV Domain level Discussions'''
 
:* '''DEV Domain level Discussions'''
 
:* '''DEV PCD Program Discussion'''
 
:* '''DEV PCD Program Discussion'''
 +
:* '''DEV PCH Program Discussion'''
 +
:* '''DEV DPi Program Discussion'''
 
:: Planning Committee:  Review, plan and initiate PCD activities; contribute to planning of the HIMSS Interoperability Showcase and other Showcases and events; recruit vendors and users.
 
:: Planning Committee:  Review, plan and initiate PCD activities; contribute to planning of the HIMSS Interoperability Showcase and other Showcases and events; recruit vendors and users.
:: Technical Committee:  Review and adopt brief profile proposals;Adjourn Joint PC&TC meeting. contribute to Connectathon test tools, tests, and procedures.
+
:: Technical Committee:  Review and adopt brief profile proposals; Adjourn Joint PC&TC meeting. contribute to Connectathon test tools, tests, and procedures.
  
 
== Location & General Schedule ==
 
== Location & General Schedule ==
Line 22: Line 24:
 
: '''Dates'''  
 
: '''Dates'''  
  
:- To assist European participants, all meetings will be morning meetings, with a meeting on Friday.
+
:- To assist European participants, all meetings(except the Pump WG) will be morning meetings, with a meeting on Friday.
 
:: the times will be 9AM EDT - 1PM EDT
 
:: the times will be 9AM EDT - 1PM EDT
  
::: Monday : Pump Working Group
+
:::* Monday : Pump Meeting (Noon to 3pm Eastern)
::: Tuesday : Joint DEV Domain meeting (PCD+DPi+PCH), PCD Planning Committee
+
:::* Wednesday : PCD Planning Committee (9am to 1pm Eastern)
::: Wednesday : PCD Planning and Technical Committees
+
:::* Thursday, : PCD Technical Committee (9am to 1pm Eastern)
::: Thursday, : PCD Technical Committee
+
:::* Friday, : Joint DEV Domain meeting (PCD+DPi+PCH)(9am to 1pm Eastern)
::: Friday, : PCD Technical Committee
 
  
 
:: The schedule is proposed; actual meeting times may change during the week.
 
:: The schedule is proposed; actual meeting times may change during the week.
Line 51: Line 52:
 
: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
 
: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
 
: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements  
 
: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements  
: 201  Pump utilization - publicizing
 
 
: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
 
: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
  
 
== Webex Support==
 
== Webex Support==
  
Because of COVID-19, these meetings will be held via Webex. The links will are provided below.  
+
Because of COVID-19, these meetings will be held via Webex. The links are provided below.  
  
 
Reminders: the IP agreement is in force, and participation counts toward voting rights.
 
Reminders: the IP agreement is in force, and participation counts toward voting rights.
Line 64: Line 64:
 
The IHE Webex page is [[https://ihe.webex.com/ IHE Webex]]
 
The IHE Webex page is [[https://ihe.webex.com/ IHE Webex]]
  
:DEV PCD Meetings
+
:DEV PCD Meeting Archive 2021s
  
:- Monday, October 5: DEV PCD Pump WG: Meeting Number:     145 575 8268
+
:* Monday, April 26: IHE DEV April'21 vF2F: DEV PCD Pump WG: Meeting Number: 167 728 8656
  
:- Tuesday, Oct 6: DEV Domain joint, followed by DEV PCD PC: Meeting Number:     145 230 3641
+
:* Wednesday April 28: DEV PCD PC: Meeting Number: 167 892 6443
  
:- Wednesday Oct 7: Joint DEV PCD PC&TC and TC: Meeting Number:     145 257 7058
+
:* Thursday April 29: DEV PCD TC: Meeting Number: 167 419 4377
  
:- Thursday Oct 8: DEV PCD TC: Meeting Number:     145 546 3377
+
:* Friday, April 30: DEV Domain joint: Meeting Number: 167 109 3080
  
:- Friday, Oct 9: DEV PCD TC: Meeting Number:    145 767 6035
+
'''Updated 4/12/2021 KE'''
  
: PCH Meetings:
+
'''Updated 4/19/2021 MJK'''
 
 
:- Tuesday, Oct 6: DEV Domain joint: Meeting Number: 145 230 3641
 
 
 
: DPi Meetings:
 
 
 
:- Tuesday, Oct 6: DEV Domain joint: Meeting Number: 145 230 3641
 
'''Updated 8/10/2020 PRS'''
 
  
 
== Attachments / Materials ==
 
== Attachments / Materials ==
Line 107: Line 100:
 
! width="20%"  align="center"  |Committees
 
! width="20%"  align="center"  |Committees
 
!              align="center"  |Topics
 
!              align="center"  |Topics
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | '''Monday'''
+
| align="center" | '''Monday Pt. 1'''
| align="center" | 09:00 - 12:00
+
| align="center" | 12:00 - 1:30
 
| align="center" | PCD Pump workgroup
 
| align="center" | PCD Pump workgroup
 
|
 
|
 +
:
 +
:* Introductions - Kurt
 +
:* Agenda review - Kurt
 +
:* [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]] - Kurt
 
::
 
::
:* Morning (09:00-12:00)
+
::* Pump Terms containment model update - .5 hr
::* Introductions - Kurt
+
::: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ym939O0Gz8hgozA9W90sWpI_W1BTJg5d/view?usp=sharing 2020-02-24.DMC.1m.2021-01-18T17.final.corrected-MDC_MOC_BATT.xls]
::* Agenda review - Kurt
+
::: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/12XpGZhrcMycsCJcE8aZ3qoIaiG8OJAj5/view?usp=sharing PumpNumDevTerms.x2c.2020-12-02T18.UoM.Enums-CommonTermsAdded.etc.xls]
::* [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]] - Kurt
+
::* Rack/Pillar/Stack terms and CP - .5 hr
:::
+
::: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/10U-4DmNpQki0isVf_5e_-DFrMnGoNRCm/view?usp=sharing _04_19_2020_CP-PCD-nnn-PUMP_Slots-Racks-Pillars.doc]
::* 9:10
+
::* Units of measure - .5 hr
:::Pump Terms containment model update - .5hr
+
:::How are the UOM codes below used?
:::Rack/Pillar/Stack terms and CP - 1hr
+
:::_UOM_DOSE_CONC
::
+
:::_UOM_DOSE_QUAN
::* Break (10:40-10:50)
+
:
::: RTMMS ENUM description updates
 
:::
 
:::
 
::::
 
::::
 
:* 12:00 > Meeting Adjournment
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
 
 
=== Tuesday Oct 6, 2020 ===
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
:{|border="2"
 
|-
 
! width="10%"  align="center" |Date
 
! width="10%"  align="center" |Hours
 
! width="20%"  align="center"  |Committees
 
!              align="center"  |Topics
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
| align="center" | '''Tuesday Pt. 1'''
 
| align="center" | 09:00 - 11:00
 
| Joint IHE Devices (DEV) Meeting
 
|
 
:* 09:00 > [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]] (Kurt)
 
:* 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
 
:* 09:20 > Welcome (15 minutes)
 
:* 09:30 > Program Reports (20 minutes each)
 
:: 09:30 PCD
 
:: 09:50 PCH
 
:: 10:10 DPI
 
 
 
:* IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
 
 
 
:* Review 2020/2021 Milestones - [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Domain_Milestone_Dates]
 
 
 
:* Domain Discussions
 
:: Domain vs. Program decisions (Profiles, CPs, etc.)  (Paul Sherman)
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | '''Break'''  
 
| align="center" | '''Break'''  
| align="center" | 11:00 - 11:15 AM
+
| align="center" | 1:30 - 1:40 PM
 
|
 
|
 
|  
 
|  
 
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | '''Tuesday Pt. 2'''
+
| align="center" | '''Monday Pt. 2'''
| align="center" | 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM
+
| align="center" | 1:40 PM - 3:10 PM
| Joint IHE Devices (DEV) Meeting Continued
+
| align="center" | Meeting Continued
 
|
 
|
 +
::* Discussion of new terms for Maintenance (used for flush, prime, and KVO) - .5 hr
 +
::: Events that occur during a flush (stop, pause, alerts)
 +
::: Flush volume in PCD-03 with multiple meds
 +
:::: How to indicate a different fluid source (flush) vs a separate order
 +
::
 +
::* Discussion of new terms for Relay - .5 hr
 +
::: How does switching sources and devices apply to relay
 +
::
 +
::* RTMMS ENUM description updates- .5 hr
 +
::: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EHs05YEk_RpTcYrcTvAUDbMhQ6KG7hh3/view?usp=sharing Pump_enum_descriptions.xlsx]
 +
::
 +
:* 3:10 > Meeting Adjournment
 +
|- 
 +
|-
 +
|}
  
:* 11:15 >
 
:: New Proposals
 
::- DPI - Medical Device Interoperability Reference Architecture (MDIRA)
 
:: PCH- PCH D2C Work-item Brief Proposal [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Direct-to-Cloud-Constrained_Devices_Brief_Proposal#3._Key_Use_Case]
 
:: DEV PC Action Items: [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/DEV_Planning_Committee_Action_Items DEV PC Action Items]
 
::- 002 Board Review
 
::- 003 Wiki Web Updates
 
::- 004 Finalize the DEV Cochair Leadership (PCD vs DEV TC & PC) - Call for Domain Cochairs. Put forth 2 names for the DEV Ballot
 
::: Ballot currently open - results or finish vote (Michael)
 
:: Proposed schedule for Spring 2021 F2F
 
::- If Virtual
 
::: Tuesday AM Pump WG
 
::: Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
 
::: Thurs AM TC
 
::: Friday AM Joint DEV
 
::- If Live
 
::: Tuesday Pump WG
 
::: Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
 
::: Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
 
::: Thurs PM Joint DEV
 
:* 12:45 > Next steps and wrap up
 
:* 13:00 > Adjourn Joint DEV Meeting
 
 
'''updated 10/02/2020'''
 
 
|}
 
  
 
=== Wednesday April 28, 2021 ===
 
=== Wednesday April 28, 2021 ===
Line 228: Line 168:
 
::- Review & Approve PC Agenda (Kurt)
 
::- Review & Approve PC Agenda (Kurt)
 
:: General PCD Work Program Review (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
 
:: General PCD Work Program Review (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
::- ACM (Rob W for Monroe P)
+
::
::- MEM DMC (Rob W for Monroe P)
+
::- General update on PCD TF Vol 10 (John R)
::- MEM LS (Rob W for Monroe P)
+
::- ACM (Monroe P)
 +
::- MEM DMC (Monroe P)
 +
::- MEM LS (Monroe P)
 
::- WCM (Paul Schluter)
 
::- WCM (Paul Schluter)
 
::- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
 
::- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
Line 240: Line 182:
 
::- PCIM (John R)
 
::- PCIM (John R)
 
::- Physio monitor (John R)
 
::- Physio monitor (John R)
::- DEC  
+
::- DEC (John R)
:::* General update PCD TF) (John R)
 
 
:::* DEC OPTION:  FHIR  (Todd C)
 
:::* DEC OPTION:  FHIR  (Todd C)
 
::- EC (John R)
 
::- EC (John R)
Line 260: Line 201:
 
: 11:30 >   
 
: 11:30 >   
 
:- Review current Action Item: [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
 
:- Review current Action Item: [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
::  None as of 9/30/2020
+
::  None as of 4/26/2021
  
 
: Adjourn Planning Committee meeting
 
: Adjourn Planning Committee meeting
Line 288: Line 229:
 
:* DEV PCD Program review:
 
:* DEV PCD Program review:
  
 +
:: Update PCD TF Vol 10 (John R)
 
:: ACM (Monroe P)
 
:: ACM (Monroe P)
 
:: MEM DMC (Monroe P)
 
:: MEM DMC (Monroe P)
Line 296: Line 238:
 
:: IPEC (Kurt)
 
:: IPEC (Kurt)
 
:: Pump (Kurt)
 
:: Pump (Kurt)
:: DPI  (John R)
 
 
:: Physio monitor (John R)
 
:: Physio monitor (John R)
 
:: PCIM (John R)
 
:: PCIM (John R)
Line 302: Line 243:
 
:: IDCO (Alexander Kraus)
 
:: IDCO (Alexander Kraus)
 
:: RTM (Paul Schluter)  
 
:: RTM (Paul Schluter)  
 +
:: RTM model update (Michael Faughn)
 
::  Quiet Hospital
 
::  Quiet Hospital
  
Line 315: Line 257:
 
|  
 
|  
  
 +
:*11:00 Farewell Send-off to Paul Sherman
 
:*11:15 > Continued topic discussions
 
:*11:15 > Continued topic discussions
  
Line 323: Line 266:
 
:: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
 
:: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
 
:: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements  
 
:: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements  
:: 201  Pump utilization - publicizing
 
 
:: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
 
:: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
  
 
|}
 
|}
  
=== Friday, Oct 9, 2020 ===
+
=== Friday, April 30, 2021 DEV Domain ===
  
 
:{|border="2"  
 
:{|border="2"  
Line 336: Line 278:
 
! width="20%"  align="center" |Lead
 
! width="20%"  align="center" |Lead
 
!              align="center" |Agenda Items
 
!              align="center" |Agenda Items
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | '''Friday Pt. 1'''
 
| align="center" | '''Friday Pt. 1'''
| align="center" | 09:00 - 11:00 AM
+
| align="center" | 09:00 - 11:00
|  
+
| Joint IHE Devices (DEV) Meeting
 
|
 
|
 +
:* 09:00 > [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]] (Kurt)
 +
:* 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
 +
:* 09:20 > Welcome (15 minutes)
 +
:* 09:30 > Program Reports (20 minutes each)
 +
:: 09:30 PCD
 +
:: 09:50 PCH
 +
:: 10:10 DPI
  
:* 09:00 > Additional Topics
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | '''Break'''  
 
| align="center" | '''Break'''  
| align="center" | 11:00 - 11:15 AM
+
| align="center" | 11:15 - 11:25 AM
 
|
 
|
 
|  
 
|  
Line 353: Line 300:
 
| align="center" | '''Friday, Pt. 2'''  
 
| align="center" | '''Friday, Pt. 2'''  
 
| align="center" | 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM
 
| align="center" | 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM
| DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
+
|
 
|  
 
|  
  
:*11:15 > Continued topic discussions
+
:*11:25 > Continued topic discussions
 +
 
 +
:* IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
 +
 
 +
:* Review 2021/2022 Milestones - [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Domain_Milestone_Dates]
  
 +
:* Domain Discussions
 +
:: DEV Domain Rosters and transition to new tools (Confluence and Zoom, possibly other).
 +
Reference: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AWuSbQ5H9gxM_6fmalPoo90Z6fxUjcoN
  
 
: F2F Action Review (from this week)
 
: F2F Action Review (from this week)
  
 
:- DEV - PCD Program
 
:- DEV - PCD Program
:: If approved, schedules for Spring 2021 F2F
+
:: If approved, schedules for Fall 2021 F2F
 
 
::- If Virtual
 
::: Tuesday AM Pump WG
 
::: Wed AM PC
 
::: Thurs AM TC
 
::: Friday AM Joint DEV
 
 
 
::- If Live
 
::: Tuesday Pump WG
 
::: Wed AM PC
 
::: Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
 
::: Thurs PM Joint DEV
 
 
 
:: PC
 
 
 
: New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2.  Owner: John Rhoads
 
 
 
: Five Year Plan - Do we still need it?  Review at next PC meeting.
 
  
 
: Next F2F -
 
: Next F2F -
:*  Week of April 26, 2021
+
:*  Week of Oct ?? , 2021
:*  Plan on virtual, hope for F2F
+
:*  Plan on In Person F2F
 
 
  
:: TC
 
::
 
  
 
:* > TC Meeting Wrap up and Adjournment (Fournier)
 
  
 
|}
 
|}
Line 402: Line 333:
  
  
'''Monday Oct 5'''
+
'''Monday April 26'''
 
:'''Chair:''' '' Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
 
:'''Chair:''' '' Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
:'''Participants:'''  '' Al Engelbert (BBraun), Ali Nakoulima (Cerner), Brian Witkowski (BBraun), Christophe Fournier (Fresenius), Jeff Rinda (Interoperability Solutions), Marufur Rahmen (ICU), Paul Schluter (CMI), Tom Kowalczyk (BBraun)  
+
:'''Participants:'''  '' Al Engelbert (BBraun), Bill Haralson (Smiths), Brian Sullivan(BD), Brian Witkowski (BBraun), Caroline Cornelius (Baxter), Dan Kernan (Epic), Jeff Rinda (Interoperability Solutions), Lisa Digget (BD), Marufur Rahmen (ICU), Paul Schluter (), Shantanu Chawla (BD), Tom Kowalczyk (BBraun)
  
'''Tuesday, Oct 6'''
+
'''Wednesday, April 28'''
 
:'''Chair:''' '' Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
 
:'''Chair:''' '' Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
: '''Participants:''' Jacob Anderson, Todd Cooper, Kurt Elliason, Al Engelbert, Thom Erickson, Javier Espina, Michael Faughn, Christophe Fournier, Ken Fuchs, John Garguilo, Timon Grob,  Jorn, Mike Kirwan, Tom Kowalczyk, Koichiro Matsumoto, Eric Moll, Monroe Pattillo, Dalibor Pokrajac, Marufar Rahman, Martin Rosner, Stefan Schlicting, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Rob Wilder, Brian Witkowski
+
: '''Participants:'''  
  
'''Wednesday, Oct 7'''
+
'''Thursday, April 29'''
:'''Chair:''' '' Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
 
: '''Participants:''' Kurt Elliason, Al Engelbert, Javier Espina, Michael Faughn, Christophe Fournier, Mike Kirwan, Tom Kowalczyk, Monroe Pattillo, Dalibor Pokrajac, Marufar Rahman, Stefan Schlicting, Paul Schluter, Paul Sherman, Rob Wilder, Brian Witkowski
 
 
 
'''Thursday, Oct 8'''
 
  
 
:'''Chair:'''  
 
:'''Chair:'''  
 
:'''Participants:'''
 
:'''Participants:'''
  
'''Friday, Oct 9'''
+
'''Friday, April 30'''
 
:'''Chair:'''  
 
:'''Chair:'''  
 
:'''Participants:'''
 
:'''Participants:'''
Line 449: Line 376:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 2
 
| align="center" | 2
| '''Pump Terms containment model update''' <br>  
+
| ''' Pump Terms containment model update ''' <br>  
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rN5x8Uhlj6s8qIoExzaS1EyfrpgfvCZt/edit
+
: Reviewed status of terms and 10101b update.
::Comments added to Review Comments tab in spreadsheet
+
::Pump terms are final, have REFIDs and descriptions assigned.   10101b is working on ventilator terms expect it to be a few months yet before it is ready for final comments and balloting.
::Identified some missing terms/descriptions.  
 
::Deprecated/to be withdrawn terms have been removed from Model already, Brian has a list that has been added to spreadsheet as new tab
 
:::Deprecated terms needs to be reviewed by everyone, need to add replacement terms for each deprecated term.  
 
::Decision on readiness of terms for IEEE 10101b - getting closer, still need to finish a few updates based on questions/comments.
 
 
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| align="center" | 3
 
| align="center" | 3
| '''PCD-10 question Flush event''' <br>  
+
| ''' Rack/Pillar/Stack terms and CP ''' <br>  
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:PCD-10 question on Flush event, MDC_EVT_STAT_LINE_FLUSH.
 
::IPEC has very specific events defined, this could be a PCD-01 event but would not be a PCD-10 event.
 
  
 +
:Review of proposed CP content.
 +
::Identifies number of pillars and which direction (horizontal or vertical pillars)
 +
:: split pillar definitions from pump location.  Pillar info goes in MDS, pump detail in VMD
 +
:: clarified several enums
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 5
+
| align="center" | 4
| '''Next meeting''' <br>  
+
| ''' Units of measure  ''' <br>  
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
: Decided to hold next pump WG meeting on Oct 26th, will cancel Oct 12th.
 
::: Brian working on FHIR based approach to programming pumps  - will add to agenda for discussion on the 26th
 
::: Christophe will prepare some examples of messages using the Model for review on the 26th.
 
  
:Pump WG F2F meeting adjourned at 10:30
+
: The constructs _UOM_DOSE_CONC and _UOM_DOSE_QUAN specify groups of units-of-measure that may be referenced by a METRIC observation or setting.  Any unit-of-measure belonging the specified _group may be used.  These are all documented on the NIST RTMMSv1 but may have been updated by the infusion pump WG.
 +
 
 +
: Other possibly missing units were reviewed. 
 +
::*mgPE
 +
::*Vials
 +
::*Kunit
 +
::*kunit/kg
 +
::*EU
 +
::*EU/kg
 +
::*mcal
 +
::*mcal/kg
 +
::*kIU
 +
::*kIU/kg
 +
::*mIU  
 +
::*mIU/kg
 +
::*IU
 +
::*IU/kg
  
 +
:::International unit exist in the list.  [iU]  Paul referred to notes in IEEE11073  other units are identified by [USP] and [arb'U]
 +
:::BD to follow up on mgPE, UCUM units may be extensible.
  
'''Action(s):'''
+
::Vials are a question that requires further discussion.  How are they different from syringes or other containers.  Isn't the contents of the vial also in another UOM already?
See above
 
  
|-
+
::Need more definition on EU
  
|}
+
::Kunit  is this USP, IU or arb'U?
  
=== Tuesday DEV Domain Meeting Summary ===
+
::Some updates needed to list
 +
::: 4 entries have /hr instead of /h  and not in a group
 +
:::kcal and cal not in a group 
 +
::::_UOM_DOSE_QUAN_CALORIC
 +
::::_UOM_DOSE_RATE_CALORIC
 +
: Will schedule time for more discussion of units during a regular pump WG session.
  
:{|border="2"
 
 
|-
 
|-
! width="5%"  align="center" |Item
+
| align="center" | 5
! width="25%" align="left"  |Topic
+
| ''' Discussion of new terms for Maintenance (used for flush, prime, and KVO) ''' <br>
!              align="left"  |Discussion
+
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
 
 +
::Adding new term to _MDC_PUMP_NOT_DELIVERING_REASON for pump-stopped-flushing
 +
::Consider adding new term to _MDC_PUMP_DELIV_STAT for pump-delivery-status-priming, needs more discussion and a complete description.
 +
: Will schedule time during a regular pump WG session for further discussion on flush and priming.
 +
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 1
+
| align="center" | 6
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Chair
+
| ''' Discussion of new terms for Relay  ''' <br>  
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:  Kurt Elliason reviewed the IHE IP Management Process
 
:  Introductions and Agenda Review
 
  
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
+
::Adding new term to _MDC_PUMP_NOT_DELIVERING_REASON for pump-stopped-switching-device
: Agenda approved  
+
::Reviewed CP -148 that added some new terms for Relay. 148 was not included in Revision 9, should by in Revision 10.
'''Action(s):'''
+
:: Use of PCD-03 to program pumps was not included in the initial CP, only documentation.  More work needs to be done in order to program a relay across multiple pumps using PCD-03.
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 2
+
| align="center" | 7
| '''Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes''' <br>- Chair
+
| ''' RTMMS ENUM description updates  ''' <br>  
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
+
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
+
:New terms were proposed during the WG meeting but time ran out before the full list could be reviewed.  Will schedule time during a regular pump WG session.
  
  
 
|-
 
|-
| align="center" | 3
+
| align="center" | 8
| '''Agenda Items''' <br>-
+
| '''   ''' <br>  
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
  
 +
:Pump WG F2F meeting adjourned at 3:10
  
:* 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
 
 
:* Program Reports
 
:: PCD
 
::- Quiet Hospital (Rob)
 
:::  Constant progress, discussing some changes, esp with ACM.  Some changes underway.  Lot of Definition progress.  Word is getting out very well via a HIMSS video.  Pla to have presentations witrh SDPi and ACM included at the HIMSS Showcase.
 
::- Pumps (Brian)
 
::: Terminology updating underway.  Formalizing new termss and cleaning up existing terms.  New spreadsheet with containment model hierarchy.  Michael Faughn asking a lot of good questions.  Hope to get it out for review and then inclusion in 10101b.
 
 
:: PCH (Thom)
 
::- Slide deck on Google Drive.
 
::-  Promotional Activities – Blog series came out.  Participated in FHIR Dev Days, will join the November session as well.  IHE Webinar, video on Youtube.  Participated in HIMSS Europe 2020.
 
::- Preparing Program Value proposition for customers.
 
::- Working with IEEE-PHD to simplify the information model.  Working on 2nd draft – will have BT info to develop a generic sensor profile.  Close to BARB (Bluetooth Architecture Review Board) review.
 
::- D2C constrained Implementation (Brief Proposal prepared to vote on today)
 
::- Mobile Health Apps – styill in queue
 
::- Test and Tools – Gazelles, POU Profiles and Remote Testing capabilities.
 
::- Project Gemini Participation – Info in slides.
 
::- PCHA Code report – Goal to connect any medical devices to any EMR.
 
::- Surveyed builders – Got to 300-400 people, will wrap up in a couple of weeks.
 
:: 10:10 DPI (Ken)
 
::- Had about 2-3 meetings focused on Brief Profile Proposal.  Still getting organized and moving forward.
 
 
:* Review 2020/2021 Milestones - [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Domain_Milestone_Dates]
 
:: 2020 – TF in final stages, will be published soon
 
:: 2021 – Looking format similar to ITI, rather than hard dates, would make us more nimble.  Monroe – need to check with Mary on how it will affect her workload.  DEV Cochairs will take this forward as an ‘’’Action Item’’’
 
 
:* Domain Discussions
 
:: Domain vs. Program decisions (Profiles, CPs, etc.)  (Paul Sherman)
 
::- Thom – Do things at the program level as much as possible.  Rob – CPs at program level, but communicate at Domain level.  Quiet Hospital is a good example PCD work that affects DPi is a good example.  Unless it’s at the governance level, we may not need Domain action.  Rob will assemble some notes for review at DEV Cochairs ’’’Action Item’’’
 
 
:: New Proposals
 
::- DPI - Medical Device Interoperability Reference Architecture (MDIRA) (Todd)
 
::: Been circulated within Dpi and DEV for review.  A 10 year journey to get here.
 
::: How to leverage existing standards to create a DEV Porofile (Add transactions and Actors).  MDIRA leverages existing ICE work.
 
::: Talk about data logger – how will we get the data out of the logger?  No guidance on that yet.  Dialysis is using the HL7 v2 ‘Batch’ function – it works very well.  There is a lot of work available that can help.
 
:::  Are there actual devices that are using or planning on using this?  Yes, it’s a DoD funded project; there is a pump and couple of monitors that are using it.  2-3 pump companies are preparing to implement it.  The plan is to have it open source.  Big question – is this addressing problems already solved?  It is focused on solutions that provide value.
 
:::  Todd displayed MDIRA website and link.  Discussed process, monetization and open source nature of the product.
 
::: Motion proposed (Christophe), Second (Rob) – approved.
 
 
::- PCH D2C Work-item Brief Proposal [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Direct-to-Cloud-Constrained_Devices_Brief_Proposal#3._Key_Use_Case]  (Thom and Michael)
 
::: Figure out to have a small device send info in a low coverage area without the battery running down fast.  Touches on a number of standards for leverage. 
 
::: Proposal voted on and approved.
 
::: Discussion of process for detailed proposal.  Can be close to TI or just a bit more detailed.  Other members will help with that work.
 
 
::- Motions will be posted on the meeting folder and the current cycle folder.
 
 
:: DEV PC Action Items: [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/DEV_Planning_Committee_Action_Items DEV PC Action Items]
 
::- 002 Board Review
 
::- 003 Wiki Web Updates
 
::: Todd has some more to do yet, re-open and set to Oct 27
 
::- 004 Finalize the DEV Cochair Leadership (PCD vs DEV TC & PC) - Call for Domain Cochairs. Put forth 2 names for the DEV Ballot. 
 
::: Closed, slate approved
 
::: Paul and Michael will formalize IHE notification.
 
 
:: Proposed schedule for Spring 2021 F2F
 
::- Propose April for meeting month.  Not week of
 
::- Discussion regarding virtual vs. F2F, a lot depends on HIMSS support commitment.  Concerns about HIMSS support coordination. 
 
::- Will
 
::- If Virtual
 
::: Monday Pump WG
 
::: Tues PCD PC
 
::: Wed Joint PC/TC and TC
 
::: Thurs TC
 
::: Friday Joint DEV
 
::- If Live
 
::: Tuesday Pump WG
 
::: Wed AM PC and Joint PC/TC
 
::: Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
 
::: Thurs PM Joint DEV
 
 
:: Discussion of HIMSS conference and Use Case presentations.
 
::- Rob discussed their recent experience with the virtual showcase.  Discussion on process and plans for the August HIMSS conference Showcase.
 
 
:* IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
 
:- January – update on Global Consortium at ONC conference.  HL7, HIMSS, PCH Alliance and IHE pledge to cooperate.  Consortium formed and will start to leverage strength.  May hear some noise about IHE and FHIR ‘taking over the world’; not the case, taking advantage our work and support it.  Work and coordination, specs, testing happens in IHE (Gemini Project), Consortium is interested in promoting and encouraging work forward and creating publicity and awareness.  Is it all about FHIR?  There was a lot of discussion.  HL7 is highly focused on FHIR, though most work is in V2. 
 
:- Membership is strong, a lot due to DEV.
 
:-  IHE Europe Connectathon is virtualized (early November)  Cost is about the same due to platform work.  Plugathon coming up as well.  Plan to leverage this work for the NA Connectathon.  NA Connectathon is rescheduled for March now.  Showcase will be part of August HIMSS conference.
 
Any details on when we’ll get info on the NA Connectathon?  Likely nothing until after the European Connectathon.
 
 
:- Discussion of Showcase presentations and virtual vs. live.  Cost estimates?  Tom:  Took 5 months to prep, physical device expenses, software costs were minimal.  May be an advantage to prep for virtual; live conversion costs wouldn’t be overwhelming.  Getinge sponsored a lot of the work, so those expenses were minimized.  More support from HIMSS would help this a lot.  It’s easier to pivot from virtual to F2F vs. the other direction.  Do we, or can we assemble a ‘lesson learned’ document to take back to IHE and HIMSS – Tom and Todd will work on it. ‘’’DEV Action Item’’’  Review at DEV Leadership call Oct 27.
 
 
:- Role of IHE with other orgs – Making slow but consistent progress.  Seems to be at a good pace.  Project Gemini components are easier to understand than prior efforts.  Confluence helps, Rob recommends we adopt it.  ONC funded project to get IHE published same level as HL7, making progress, though still heavily FHIR focused.
 
 
:* Github discussion:  Make sure which CPs need integrated to Github.  John R – Cps
 
::  Draft 2020 TF prep.  Make a DEV Committee ‘’’Action Item’’’, due Oct 28.
 
 
:* Next steps and wrap up
 
::  Milestone process review
 
::  Proposals distributed as needed to proceed, plus confirm Milestones dates.
 
::  Spring meeting – assume virtual, select April dates after week of 5th.
 
::  Send final list of Cochairs to IHE.
 
::  DEV Cochairs – virtual vs. live Showcase
 
::  Github update
 
 
:* > Adjourn Joint DEV Meeting
 
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
: New Proposals
 
:* DPI - Medical Device Interoperability Reference Architecture (MDIRA)
 
:: Approved
 
:* PCH D2C Work-item Brief Proposal [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Direct-to-Cloud-Constrained_Devices_Brief_Proposal#3._Key_Use_Case]
 
:: Approved
 
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
 +
See above
  
::  Milestone process review
+
|-
::  Proposals distributed as needed to proceed, plus confirm Milestones dates.
 
::  Spring meeting – assume virtual, select April dates after week of 5th.
 
::  Send final list of Cochairs to IHE.
 
::  DEV Cochairs – virtual vs. live Showcase
 
::  Github update
 
  
 +
|}
  
|}
 
  
 
=== Wednesday DEV PCD PC Meeting Summary ===
 
=== Wednesday DEV PCD PC Meeting Summary ===
Line 667: Line 506:
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
  
:: General PCD Work Program Review (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
+
::- General update on PCD TF Vol 10 (John R)
::- ACM (Rob W and Monroe P)
+
::: Working with Todd on new Vol 1 material.  Implementing SDPI material.  John lost access to info on his Philips computer, which affected his Vol 2 work.  Reconstructing it now and will push to Github.  John will provide the publish date soon.  It will include all CPs to date?  Yes.
::: Rather quiet, most work associated with Quiet HospitalReviewing a couple of Cps, another may be createdOne is addressing some PCD-05 updatesLikely 3 Cps before CN, focus on PCD-05 content; CN testing showed some enhancements were neededFound some HL7 non-complianceNIST tool looks for some content and format, but not specific contentMarket penetration is increasing, some Non IHE vendors asked Rob if SPOK was compliant.
+
::- ACM (Rob and Monroe P)
 +
::: Have a list of 8 or 9 items, mostly technical.  Also have a list of planning items: 
 +
:::- Nurse call - have 3 interested parties and have implemented in products.  Hope to get them into the working group.  Ascom a bit interested.  Hill Rom is in CNs but need to contact themRauland is also a possibility.  Nurse call vs. Alert Manager?  Biggest difference is different type of alerts, generally not physiologic (Advisories). Actual alarms are a grey areaNurse call is an AR, but can be AM via aggregating medical equipment alerts. 
 +
:::- Bed vendors - Talked to Hill-Rom and Stryker.  Awaiting regular participationThey're interested, but not engaged yet.
 +
:::- Documenting Lab and Radfiology results - There's a need for it.  Have discussed with Radiology vendors plus some Neuro vendorsMost use proprietary interfaces, with no HL7 experience.  PACS often have HL7 interfacesThere are some challenges adopting HL7; mACM hasn't been commercially implemented yetSome discussion regarding immunization; ACM not really involved, perhaps if the patients become ACM recipients.
 +
:::- Still pursuing need for AC actor in NIST tools.  Often at risk of not passing CN.
 
::- MEM DMC (Monroe P)
 
::- MEM DMC (Monroe P)
::: No new major activities, mostly nomenclature, which didn’t affect TIGetting some interest in this profile.
+
::: Some background on original focus (CMMS)Expanding into other utilization.
 
::- MEM LS (Monroe P)
 
::- MEM LS (Monroe P)
::: No new major activities, mostly nomenclature, which didn’t affect TIIEEE still planning to use HL7 for upper communication layerIEEE wants to know who to contact for agreeing to them using it.  Todd may be a good source to check.  Dalibor will check with him.  John R. - There may be a copyright acknowledgement needed, check with Todd or Mary Jungers.
+
::: Location 'tags' are getting smarter, providing other signals and infoCan send info to CMMS as well as LS systemCan be helpful for utilization.
 
::- WCM (Paul Schluter)
 
::- WCM (Paul Schluter)
::: Nothing major.  
+
::: Nothing new happening, it's being tested and used.  With vent terms, could provide more info.
 
::- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
 
::- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
:::  Very good progressClose to drafting textMany hope to attend NA Connectathon.
+
::: Terminology revision mostly done, working with Michael Faughn to get them into RTMMS. Trying to sort out what is within standard terms and what's beyond thatBoston Scientific signed up for CN, but weren't able to testHopefully next time.
::- RTM (Paul Schluter)
+
::- RTM and Vents (Paul Schluter)
::: Very good pump term progress, due to Brians updates. Once finalized can add codes to them and MEMDMC termsDialysis is in very good shape, a full profileIncludes TF and master spreadsheet with all needed terms, trees, models, etcIncludes six major vendorsOnce pumps and dialysis done, can have a balloit.
+
:::  Have some notes and will put on Google DrivePaul has worked with vent vendors to come up with a standardized modelGroup 7 has some terms.  Paul has set a deadline for new terms for this roundWill set up a ballot after that.  Working with Dialysis, making progress and have a good approachThey're pushing terms to their industry.
::- Vent (Paul Schluter)
 
::: Working with Getinge on their productsAlso working on vent modes, can include ISO 223 mode strings.
 
 
::- PIV (Kurt)
 
::- PIV (Kurt)
:::  No major changes this cycle.  CP to clean up some terms
+
:::  Nothing major planned
 
::- IPEC (Kurt)
 
::- IPEC (Kurt)
::: FT, no changes
+
::: In FT for about a year.  Discussing new terms.  Nothing major.
 
::- Pump (Kurt)
 
::- Pump (Kurt)
:::  Finalizing terms, pretty stable otherwise.
+
:::  F2F on Monday.  Notes in wiki.  Working on some standardized numbering of pump 'stack'  ID'd some missing units.  Need to add some 'kilo' terms, as well as some for relays and flushes.  Found some RTMMS enumerations that need cleaning up.
::- PCIM (John R)
+
::- PCIM (Tom and John R)
:::  Dormant for a while, but coming back to lifeA couple of vendors are interestedSome of the original members have moved on, hope some new staff there may be interestedUnlike other work, very like FHIR work, so may be a better fitV2 query handling is ugly, FHIR handles them much better.
+
::: Workgroup starting up again.  Focusing on pump-patient association.  Goal to have something for the 2022 HIMSS conference (Orlando). Monroe - If interested in correlating people/equipment and location, there are some OBX identifiers for accuracy.  Can use MEMLS work.  There is a mechanism to set a location accuracy level.  Question - Pump pulls info from PCD 16, is it accurate enough?  MEMLS does provide the instances, but they're optionalDalibor - confidence is provided via PCD-16 is at core of IEEE LS workgroupDiscussed accuracy of RTLS systems.  The work on this will likely end up in multiple standards.  John has set the base and the workgroup is running with it.  Paul Sch - It would be great if the IEEE group can provide some background on where their work is and how it'll work with MEMLS and PCIM.  Monroe - This may be beyond the scope of what IHE works on - let IEEE define the technology and accuracy requirements.  IEEE group will provide method for vendors to identify their accuracy'Policing' will need to be via RTLS usersRather extensive technical discussion on RTLS processes and technologies.
 
::- Physio monitor (John R)
 
::- Physio monitor (John R)
:::  VERY stable – solid foundation laid 2004-006.  Very good fit, haven’t needed to modify it muchCould work on V3 for data managementSome FHIR work; won’t replace V2, but once data is in the ecosystem, FHIR can help enable distribution.
+
:::  Some things are done, some things that they want to do, but we really need customer feedbackNeed to ask ourselves - where's the pull and whose willing to sign up and do the work?  had occaisions of strong pushback (good)What ought to be done now? 
::- DEC  
+
::- DEC (John R)
::: General update PCD TF) (John R)
+
::: Some things are done, some things that they want to do, but we really need customer feedback.  Need to ask ourselves - where's the pull and whose willing to sign up and do the work?  Need terms finalized.  Paul Sch - invest resources into containment models.  There are a lot of the pieces, but it needs to be tied together.  We're very close to have something computable.
:::- Some
+
:::- DEC OPTION:  FHIR  (Todd C)
::: DEC OPTION:  FHIR  (Todd C)
+
:::: HL7 work underway for Devices on FHIR.  Some skepticism due to large volumes of data.  Some use cases can use this process.  HL7 DEV Meeting Archive 2021 - discussing with anesthesiology community; have a small space of people seeing all info and a challenging patient.  A different model from what we usually do.  Their value is in looking at data after the case.  FHIR could be a good model for this.  Many are working on this.  IHE and HL7 are working on joining the threads togetherTodd proposes to write an IHE version of the HL7 work.  Feedback:  PCD needs to monitor and provide input as needed.  Some PCD lessons being ignored.  MEMLS is an example; they don't want the detail that is needed.  Not sure it's valuable for Device - Device comms; not really set up for that.  FHIR would be great for query based Profiles.  Not good for sending models.  Need to distinguish between FHIR core and implementations, FHIR has an 'escape hatch', extensibility.  It's fairly well managed so far, to avoid full fragmentation. Still could collapse under it's own weight, but does have some control to limit the risk.  John G provided some conformance background and how well we are doing with it. 
:::- Bridging HL7 to IHE.  Lot of work by Moerkhe and others to provide FHIR equivalence.
 
 
::- EC (John R)
 
::- EC (John R)
::: Event Communication – Generalized framework for dealing with events.  Much of it is addressed in other Profiles, especially ACM.  Generalized for none Alert info, can use ACM infrastructure.  IPEC is specialized EC, prototype for EC.  MEMDMC provides device focused events.  We are good at consistent implementation in those Profiles, this is available for other use.  Tom – Is there a need for generic EC?  Can John’s comments be put in V2 to address it?  A White Paper would have limited exposure.  Paul Sc - 10101B nails it an intermediate level.  John will draft it as an addition to the TF and send out for review and input.  '''new Action Item'''
 
 
::- DCM Pulse Oximetry
 
::- DCM Pulse Oximetry
::: Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT.  PCD determined that originator prepares FT.  It’s tested, so ready, but the creators haven’t been interested doing the work so far.  John will help as bandwidth allows, which it hasn’t.  Others are welcome to help as well.  Remains on the To Do list.  Michael Faughn has made great containment tool progress.  Smaller step to get the semantics readable.
+
:::* Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT.
  
 
:- Review current Action Item: [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
 
:- Review current Action Item: [[PCD Planning Committee Action Items]]:
::  None as of 9/30/2020
+
::  None as of 4/26/2021
  
: 10:30 - Adjourn Planning Committee meeting
 
  
 +
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
  
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
  
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
  
New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2. Owner: John Rhoads
+
:Please review notes and and propose Action Items.
 
 
  
 
|}
 
|}
  
=== Wednesday Joint PCD PC&TC Meeting Summary ===
+
=== Thursday PCD TC Meeting Summary ===
  
  
Line 732: Line 570:
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
|
 
|
: [[Patent_Disclosure_Process | IHE IP Management Process]]
+
 
 +
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 +
 
 +
: Agenda approved 
 +
 
 +
: '''Meeting concluded on Thursday'''
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
Line 741: Line 584:
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
 
|
 
|
:-
+
 
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 754: Line 597:
 
|
 
|
  
 +
:* DEV PCD Program review:
 +
 +
:: Update PCD TF Vol 10 (John R)
 +
:: ACM (Monroe P)
 +
 +
:::- The cutoff v9 was cp146, now at CP 150, to pass word docs to John. Taking some time to get to these docs. Action: Michael to update the Wiki site: https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/PCD_CP_grid.
 +
:::- PCD ACM last change was for PCD-05.
 +
 +
:: MEM DMC (Monroe P)
 +
 +
:::- Nothing here.
 +
 +
:: MEM LS (Monroe P)
 +
 +
:::- Nothing here. 
 +
 +
:: DEC (John R)
 +
 +
:::- John noted that Todd advocating for (mail liaison between IHE and HL7, specifically devices). There is the Gemini project (peace making between IHE and HL7 operations). Attempt to harmonize technical content. What’s not there in HL7 is an implementation guide specifically on devices (for HL7 v2). FHIR is a successor for HL7 V2 and replacement for V3 (not fully the truth but close). FHIR is meant to be more simple and follows practices of modern computing (RestFULL, etc.). Elements may or may not be there in FHIR. HL7 V2 has been quite successful in special needs for data flows in acute care. Will likely be the traffic of the future (not broke no need to fix). There are scenarios and usecases that ppl want (e.g., mobile clients that want access to medical record data). This has been nicely worked out with the SmartonFHIR group. FHIR becoming the lead for clinical decision support. A lot of the work is redundant. ITI and patient care is getting done both ways (both V2 and FHIR). DEC Profile could be recognized in HL7. We may be asking IHE to make an HL7 FHIR IG.
 +
 +
:: EC (John R)
 +
 +
:::- Event communication: John in IPEC, similar transfers in non-infusion pump, so the basics. John has no direct experience in IPEC. If someone with IPEC experience and lead 2 or 3 meetings and see what we should say. In the TF this could be a pattern. The EC text would be a guidance, let’s do this in the IPEC way. John asks if there are experts that would be willing to sit in a few meetings and help. Tom asked the group for thoughts on John’s comments.
 +
:::- We’re solving a problem that may/may not come up in future. There may not be another in the future. We haven’t seen a new IPEC thing coming so far, so may be better to wait. May be best to place on the shelf for now. There are other projects on the list to get done sooner. We can revisit this in 6 months or so (so at a future TC or PC meeting). No objections. Decided to bring this up again at next week’s TC meeting. This will give people a couple of weeks to assess. We can decide after that what we will do going forward.
 +
 +
:: PIV (Kurt)
 +
 +
:::- Kurt presented slides. Working on terms and their descriptions/definitions (relay, flushing, etc). Additionally working on a CP for pillar/rack terms. Tom to have this CP out by the end of next week. They are also looking at clarifying units (some missing). Paul noted that some of the units need to be assessed (such as vials). Others may want to way in on this. Lisa noted that vials are very specific, so important here. Is there a way if we used vials. Paul noted that vials could be something like its own unit of measure. Lisa working on this for the next meeting.
 +
 +
:: IPEC (Kurt)
  
 +
:: Pump (Kurt)
  
:* Five year plan
+
:: DPI (John R)
:: No current plan
 
::- [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Roadmap_and_Calendar/IHE-PCD_Roadmap_F2F_2017-04-04.xls 2017 Roadmap]
 
::- and [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/Roadmap_and_Calendar/IHE_PCD_PlanNotes2011-11-16.doc 2011 Plan Notes]
 
::- Need to move links to Google Drive
 
::- Nothing past 2020/2021 cycle. Does it serve a purpose?  Is this an IHE requirement?  Check the IHE for Domain requirements.  If not, we could eliminate it.  Also check with other programs to see if they want to continue with it.  It did serve a good purpose originally.  Can this be merged into other resources.  We have an updated document.  It is useful for showing plans to member organizations and sponsors.
 
::- Add for ACM – Rationalize 60601 rules, address nomenclature
 
::- Discuss at next PC meetings
 
::- Paul will share the document with everyone.
 
  
:* Cochair Action item - 106 - Activities Promoting PCD.
+
:::- Its own operation. Todd not here. We will discuss tomorrow.  
:: The Showcase video and This is ‘IHE webinar’. Todd may have a couple of DPI activities.  
 
  
:* Location, Dates of the DEV PCD 2021 Spring F2F
+
:: Physio monitor (John R)
:: Probably virtual, not the week of April 5.  Shoot for week of 26th.
 
:: May be able to adjust dates and length after this session.
 
  
:* Do we continue this meeting?  Stop for next F2F meeting and review.
+
:::- John noted discussed yesterday. We need to get this in a computable form and reflected in containment tree.  
  
: 9:40 - Adjourn Joint DEV PCD PC&TC meeting.
+
:: PCIM (John R)
 +
 
 +
:::- In the planning realm. We have a technical profile being implemented and various companies are demonstrating it, next year. Tom noted there is interest in moving this forward (HIMSS 2022), so feel free to join recurring meetings.
 +
 
 +
:: Vent (Paul Schluter)
 +
 
 +
:::- Paul presented slides recapping nomenclature -10101b extension and their provisional groups (5 groups, see slides). He noted that the provisional codes and Ref ID take significant discussion to ensure they are legal codes. In the future if we see errant codes they can be flagged. This is an extended containment model spanning the entire IEEE 11073-10101*
 +
 
 +
:::- Presentation on Google Drive. Would like to stay with vendor approved mappings.  Many good examples are available.  Plan to discuss Aux mode variables in meetings in the next two weeks.  A lot of hard/heavy listing is done - a major accomplishment.  It's possible to define a stream to define SQI from 0-100, will be helpful for several use cases.  Some are good MS and PhD projects.  Extensive discussion of possibilities and future progress.  Think about how this can be used (medico-legal).  Hemo - signing off on final terms. Will work on orders next.  Plan to borrow as much from PCD-03 as much as possible.  Implanted devices - Regrouped, am working with Michael Faughn.
 +
 
 +
:: IDCO (Graig Reiser) - not available
 +
:: RTM model update (Michael Faughn/John G)
 +
::- Presentation on Google Drive.  Working with IDCO, working on terms that belong in RTM vs. Implementation guides.  In general what's available - wouldn't notice much change.  Been working on framework a lot, solving problems.  User Permissions - need more types of access than is currently available.  Currently all or nothing.  Demo'd term checking mechanism.  Search results - currently will show top 10, but will download all of them.  Should be finished this week.  John G - User permissions; user roles would be similar to existing in NIST.  Dockerizing - Continue IEEE royalty free agreement and IEEE-LOINC mappings.  next version enables access to those terms and enable FHIR access to keep medical terminology as 'single source of truth'.  Please tell Michael how to build tools.  John G - once RTMMS v2 is up - NIST gives feedback and encourage everyone to do so.
 +
::- NIST - Provided stats on current status.  Have all 11073 terms.  Site continues to grow (Thanks Paul Schluter)
 +
::  Quiet Hospital  (Rob)
 +
::- A couple of status meetings.  Will start on HIMSS vignette soon.  No activity at CN, so no data there.  All related CPs passed.  Post-HIMSS; hope to have user input to help guide progress.  Tom - have video available for on-demand viewing at HIMSS21.  It is available to view now at:  https://confluence.hl7.org/display/GP/Narrative%3A++Quiet+Hospital
 +
 
 +
: PCD TC Action item review
 +
 
 +
:* [[http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Technical_Committee_Action_Items TC Action items]]
 +
 
 +
:: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
 +
::- Found a new way to work on this.  They have weekly meetings, so will try to get it on their agenda.  Hope to make progress by HL7 meeting week last of May.  Review June 2.
 +
:: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements
 +
::-  Coupled with Michael Faughn's availability.  Been capturing terms at various workgroup meetings.  Set to August meeting.
 +
:: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
 +
::- Passed it into HL7 Orders and Observations, out of their hands now.  Has Monroe contacted Hans?  John will send his contact to Monroe.  Set to June meeting.
 +
 
 +
New Topic - Next possible F2F.  Tom would like an actual F2F, thoughts?  On tomorrow's agenda, but think about it.
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 782: Line 673:
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
  
 
 
|-
 
  
  
 
|}
 
|}
  
===  Thursday/Friday PCD TC Meeting Summary ===
+
===  Friday DEV Joint Meeting Summary ===
  
  
Line 808: Line 696:
 
: Agenda approved   
 
: Agenda approved   
  
: '''Meeting concluded on Thursday'''
+
:  
  
 
'''Action(s):'''
 
'''Action(s):'''
Line 817: Line 705:
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
 
|
 
|
 +
  09:00 > IHE IP Management Process (Kurt)
  
 +
::- Reviewed IP page.
 +
::- Kurt led the call.
  
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
+
  09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
:  
 
  
'''Action(s):'''
+
::- There are 18 people on the call. Each introduced themselves.
  
|-
+
  09:20 > Welcome (15 minutes)
| align="center" | 3
 
| '''Agenda Items''' <br>-
 
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 
|
 
  
:* DEV PCD Program review:
+
  09:30 > Program Reports (20 minutes each)
  
:: ACM (Monroe P)
+
  09:30 PCD
::-  Getting PCD-05 into HL7 2.8.2 conformance.  Need an MSA statement, will have a CP.  Next is a transaction resolution from the last CN.  Third CP address OBRs 3 and 29.  Want value into 29, except for 1st component.  Makes alert onset doesn’t need what’s in 29 or 3 – will resolve the conflict.  May also change some TF semantic change due to feedback.  Will discuss in workgroup – mostly to clarify for new participants.  Could add descriptions in the test case.  John G – context based can have a pre-existing data.  That can be built into NIST Tool let him or Nicholas know when they will discuss it in the ACM meeting.  They can adjust the tool to provide context.  If it feeds into OBR 3 and 29, they can check the content.  TCAMPT can let them constrain the test to comply.  Rob has samples to review at next meeting.  4PM Eastern next week.
 
:: MEM DMC and MEM LS (Monroe P)
 
::- Next release of 10101b includes some MEM nomenclature.  Both at TI status; until we get more participants to test, they aren’t comfortable sending to FT.  Been tested for more than three years, but will be at least 2022 to submit.  MEMDMC – do we have enough actors?  We need more consumers, have enough reporters; one more would be good, a CMMS would help a lot.  MEMLS has enough consumers, but not enough reporters, including different technologies. 
 
:: DEC, Physio monitor, PCIM and EC (John R)
 
::- Mostly covered at Planning meeting.  Fundamentally stable.  Have an action item to revisit DEC hierarchy and amplify it for new implementers, not very major
 
:: PIV (Kurt)
 
::- Not much new.  Some tweaking to get everything to match.  It’s pretty stable.  Working on PCA programming.  Will TF have changes – mostly to clarify values and intent, no process changes.
 
:: IPEC and Pump (Kurt)
 
::- Lot of term work.  Kurt displayed the spreadsheet they’ve worked on this cycle and highlighted the changes.  Brian added examples to the document.  Plan to wrap it up in the next two meetings and get it to Paul Schluter.  Paul Sc – lets him release the MEM terms as well.  Are the REFIDs finalized?  Pretty much, some are ‘temporary’, but once set to provisional and sent to Michael Faughn they will be permanent and inviolable.
 
:: Pump (Kurt)+
 
  
:: DPI  (Todd, Stefan)
+
::- Kurt presented slides for PCD, see link here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yE4gSja3Uj11lszM1z4Ur-N3FQLWj3cO/view?usp=sharing. For Quiet Hospital, we will have a Interoperability Showcase at HIMSS (a vignette).  
::- A lot going on and a lot still to be done. Strategy of Germini has proven very helpful, helps keep both leaderships informed, Confluence enables that, plus IHE Webex and other tools help. Key focus areas:  Getting supplement done, plugathon/connectathon work.  SDPi will be part of European Plugathon - will test remote testing. Have SASMDI technical report underway, was slow because of time, should speed up soon.  Will be discussed in Europe nexr month.  Will work on Detailed Profile Proposal.  Is there a time limit?  Not really.
+
::- Rob noted looking forward to getting this out in the community. Lack of participation at the last NA Connectathon but HIMSS should provide with an opportunity to do this. Now in a lull on technical updates. We will pick-up a use-case design in the coming months.
::
+
::- Rob would love to see SDPi incorporated in a future Vignette)
:: Vent, IDCO, RTM, Dialysis (Paul Schluter)
+
::- Infusion pump now a trial implementation.  
:-  Presentation provided.
+
::- Todd questioned the challenges they’ve seen. Kurt noted is in getting feedback from the community. Hoping that HIMSS will have a good showing. Todd also noted giving ACCE Webinar. It may be a good opportunity to run a survey again. They may be interested in partnering with us. Independent and running under the clinical engineering community (ACCE). Todd to help kick this off. The nursing and pharma groups would be good as well.  
::- A lot of work is done. Getinge has new terms for vents but a lot of provisional codes assigned.  It’s the last step before becoming a standard. Other device categories not solid enough yet for provisional terms.  Pumps almost ready.  Dialysis is pretty much done, has a call at 10AM to work on that.  Nurse call and Bed management – waiting for increased vendor participation. Their participation will also help the MEM Profiles.  Monroe – don’t wait for Nurse call and Bed management slow the existing terms down.  ISO 19223 is standardizing vent mode, this can help standardize the user facing display.
 
::- Dialysis – they’ve struggled in the past using HL7.  Lately, they’ve revisited it in the last couple of years and have made great progress using IHE messaging.  Have a solid ‘’TF’’ assembled, which will be sent out for review by about 30 vendors and user companies. It’s very solid.  Showed some examples and highlighted messages and strings.  Want to get the ISO 19223 string well defined. Brings up some questions – some want 1-1 mapping both directions.  SNOMED is working on terms as well.  John G – Have settings with these settings – would it always defined in RTMMS, or in implementation guides?  Generally in implementation guides. Can be different validation levels, which will be testable by NIST.  Will each mde have specific rules stored as a Profile or device specialization. Could be stored as a containment tree.  The standard will publish the the supported strings.  All IEEE values will be listed.  Paul displayed vent mode listand discussed it’s use.  Do these need to be translated into REFIDS?  Yes and it’s been done. This could be useful for MEM as well, very useful for off-line analysis. Wanted to gather many readings and send together, rather than sending each as a seperate message.  Monroe pointed out a solution a few months ago, the BATCH message. They are using it for Dialysis, could be used for many Profiles.  No need for any new actors.  Some discussion of solicited vs. unsolicited messages.  Dialysis really wants to use it. It won’t be used in a CN soon.  John G – If this is important add ‘should’ to the submission, it helps NIST justify the inclusion.
 
  
:: IDCO (Paul Schluter for Alexander Kraus)
+
  09:50 PCH
::- Been doing a lot of work.  Ready for major publication.  They want to participate in the next NA CN.  They’re ready to start testing.  Working on use cases.
 
  
:: Dialysis (Paul Schluter)
+
::- Thom presented PCH slides. See link here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w1vVlEPL4Im894vLmKTTmJwCXNDLFGl7/view?usp=sharing
::- Have two CPs underway for new events. One can be in ACM. Some of their work is very similar to  
+
::- Todd questioned if the videos for the IHE USA Personal Health Track at the IHE NA Connectathon are also available.
WCM annotation. Have examples of the types of relevant events. Includes a ‘continue’ function, some wouldn’t arise to the level of an ACM event.
+
::- Todd questioned the Continua Test Tool integration with the Gazelle TM tool.
 +
::- Todd questioned if there would be an IHE Profile based on the IEEE ACOM spec. Ken noted that he keeps pushing the IEEE groups. Most are not getting down to the protocol level (most higher). Todd suggested this is more semantic interoperability. Paul Schluter noted that they have worked with the ISO 22923 group who is also looking at the higher layers. 
 +
::- Todd noted that they have been doing Plugathons and questioned if PCH was doing similar things for D2C Constrained. Michael noted that Amit is planning a Plugathon later this year so D2C Constrained may be a good candidate (per the IHE ONC CoAg). Ken questioned if related to ACOM. Thom noted there are two companies doing implementations. Thom noted that one of the reasons we’re doing this is to make this easier for implementers but the very market we’re approaching does not have the resources to help. Todd noted that there’s the TC215 Personalized Digital Informatics so the PCH work helps. This would be difficult to spec as the business drivers are changing on a daily basis. Thom noted that they are integrating with existing clinical workflows and other key use-cases.  
  
:: Tooling (Michael F)
+
   10:10 DPI
::- Presentation on Google drive.  RTMMS update - Why?  Looks good but messy underneath.  Showed how it will be.  Will map terms and improve user interface, with a mechanism to introduce new terms.  Rosetta term profiles will be able to drive NIST test tooling.  Should help create conformant profiles.  Finished migrating and merging RTMMS V1 and 10101-2019 into V3.   Profiling tools have started working.  Described the reference site and demonstrated it.  Looking for feedback on how useful it is and how to make it more useful.  The public version has some issues, they will migrate it to a newer server with a newer Ubuntu version.  If you want to test V2, let him know and he'll give you access.  Containment Profiles:  Brian Witkowski has done a lot of pump work.  Reviewed what they are.  It will be computable.  Using the term boosts inclusion in 10101.  provides high level/abstract device description and can drive the test tools.  Will ordering be in a published schema?  Generally, no - for example a monitor will send 200 readings, order isn't needed.  If order is needed, can use the Facet level, which resolves order-related issues.  Some discussion of how needed ordering is for different Domains and types of systems and that feasibility, especially regarding differing standards.  May need mapping to transform this into other Domains.  Versioning - How we version things is a bit tricky.  V2 Roadmap - Improve RTM tool and ref site interface, extensions for source/event pairs, RTMMMS web services and term management for SDO users.  John G Working on integrating the two profiling tools.  With these tools, it would help for each workgroup to have a super-user to go into IGAMPT and TGAMPT and review them for their use.  John: Metric hanging off an MDS?  If omitted, we have a mechanism to insert them, very rigorous.  Need to get on workgroup calls to work this out.  What do we call a 'metric' when it's not really a metric?  Things aren't always clear, choose something and go ahead.
 
  
 +
::- Todd presented slides. See link to the slides here:
 +
::- Rob questioned the conformity assessment: Regarding the FDA’s focus on intended use and workflow has it been discussed how that would work? Todd noted that the ASCA project is focused on the 60601 series. They’ve not looked at interoperability at the current time. Several of these standards are not registered FDA SDOs. Todd believes that it would be based on your claim to the FDA. This work should help the FDA out. Perhaps IHE certification may be possible at some point.
 +
::- Monroe questioned how soon with DPI be implemented? Todd noted later this year. Will it support PCD-05. Yes, planned to be included. Most integrate with ACM based managed systems. There are some products in the world that do SDC stuff, including alerting.
 +
::- Todd provided the link to the video presented during the F2F: https://confluence.hl7.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=109546326
  
::  Quiet Hospital (Rob)
+
  IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
::- Pretty well covered.  If you’re an AR vendor and interested, watch the PCD-05 work being done
 
  
: PCD TC Action item review
+
::- Todd started by noting he would like to share a few topics. Elliot Sloan, John Donnelly have been very helpful on the devices side. How are we doing to provide value to each of you at the F2F? New members are steady and increasing (John, Lisa and Paul Schluter). Budget doing well. The CA steering committee working infographics and videos. Working on a better home for on-demand streaming that we can send people to. IHE catalyst should be good for the org in the future. Showcases and Connectathons are discussed at the Board level. eHealth for Interoperability of IHE/HIMSS Global Consortium being expanded and now engaging with the WHO but this is still in the formative stage. They may be able to provide more funding opportunities. Currently no good way of doing this in IHE.
  
:* [[http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Technical_Committee_Action_Items TC Action items]]  
+
  Review 2021/2022 Milestones - [1]
  
:: 196  Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
+
::- Kurt reviewed milestones. Discussed dates. This is now more on-demand than in the past.  
::- No update. Move to February.
 
:: 200  MDS and VMD Requirements
 
::- Should be resolved with Pump group and work with Michael Faughn.  Move out to January call.
 
:: 201  Pump utilization - publicizing.  Pretty stagnant, close.
 
:: 202  MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
 
::- In HL7 queue, move to February, after HL7 meeting.
 
  
: IHE Board meeting summary (Todd) - Pretty stable financially, had a recent boost in revenue.  A lot of national/international engagement on testing with WHO, etc.  A lot of discussion on adding value to IHE IP and assets.  How to make that info solid and add value; went well until money came up.  One idea - a "Connectathon Seal" which seems to help in Japan.  Discussed Product Registry issues, it's a challenge to add to it.  They discussed IHE certified Professional -  Monroe looked at it, shallow knowledge of all domains, not much use to any customers.
+
  Domain Discussions
  
: F2F Action Review (from this week)
+
::-DEV Domain Rosters and transition to new tools (Confluence and Zoom, possibly other).Reference: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AWuSbQ5H9gxM_6fmalPoo90Z6fxUjcoN
  
:- DEV - PCD Program
+
::- Michael noted that this was initially brought up by Rob. Javier then requested that we discuss this during the vF2F. Monroe noted that we don’t get notified of membership (who joins or leaves). Kurt questioned that we start a new list. Rob would move to have a PC and TC list consolidated then extract information from IHE. Until profiles get mature this will continue to be a problem. Paul Sherman noted that requirements for active voting meetings and on ballots. The list we have is only for use for DEV level. Rob noted that this may be a PC item to help clean-up (temporary solution), so they could likely clean up this list quickly. Todd recalled that in the past that Celina used to manage these lists. We don’t get the contact info for new members and for which are interested in DEV. This needs to be taken back to Amit. Need an automated system. Belongs above the Domain, at IHE. We need to get this fixed as this won’t set well with the orgs like the FDA. See if we can get Amit in a future PC or TC call. Todd has a call with John and Elliot later today so will have a 5m chat on how to approach this challenge. Javier added that we have an additional challenge with 3 programs so this increases the IHE Domain complexity. There is a funding question and a leadership need. There are tools out there. Reviewed the DEV Ballot Roster 2020-SEP in google drive (and made some updates).
:: If approved, schedules for Spring 2021 F2F
+
::- Kurt noted that after we get the list we can scrub the google groups as well.
 +
::- Javier questioned how often the IHE membership list was updated. No one on the call really knows. Monroe noted that he had to poke IHE to have them shown on the list. John noted that after joining that there was no email notification. Todd will discuss this as well on his call.
 +
::- Both Chris Carr and Amit have previously mentioned that we would be moving from WikiMedia to Confluence and from IHE Webex to IHE Zoom. Todd talked to how they use Jira and Confluence at HL7. This would be fantastic.
  
::- If Virtual
 
::: Tuesday AM Pump WG
 
::: Wed AM PC
 
::: Thurs AM TC
 
::: Friday AM Joint DEV
 
  
::- If Live
+
  F2F Action Review (from this week)
::: Tuesday Pump WG
 
::: Wed AM PC
 
::: Wed PM and Thurs AM TC
 
::: Thurs PM Joint DEV
 
  
:: PC
+
::- DEV - PCD Program
 +
::- If approved, schedules for Fall 2021 F2F
  
: New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2.  Owner: John Rhoads
+
  Next F2F -
  
: Five Year Plan - Do we still need it? Review at next PC meeting.
+
::- Week of Oct ?? , 2021
 +
::- Plan on In Person F2F
  
: Review live vs video demo for HIMSS Showcase.
+
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
::- Plan for video/virtual vs. plan for live or vice versa.  Tom will gather info from his team and send to  Todd to take to board.
 
  
: Next F2F -
 
:*  Week of April 26, 2021
 
:*  Plan on virtual, hope for F2F
 
  
 +
  Actions
  
:: TC
+
::- Reviewed actions list. No current open actions. We will add the actions above.
::
 
  
: Monroe moved to close meeting, Christophe second
+
::- Fall F2F
 +
::- It may be possible to have a real F2F. Paul Schluter added NIST may be possible in October. We’ll start planning for this now (). Javier noted it may still need to be hybrid.
 +
::- There are other possible F2Fs to combine together with IEEE, IHE and the FDA.
  
Closed at 1300 Thursday
+
|-
 +
| align="center" | 3
 +
| '''Agenda Items''' <br>-
 +
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
 +
|
  
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
 
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
Line 935: Line 803:
  
 
: Next F2F -
 
: Next F2F -
:*  Week of April 26, 2021
+
:*  Week of Oct **, 2021
:*  Plan on virtual, hope for F2F
+
:*  Hope for F2F
  
 
== Action Items - PCD TC and WGs ==
 
== Action Items - PCD TC and WGs ==
Line 943: Line 811:
 
== Next Meetings ==
 
== Next Meetings ==
  
DEV Domain Meeting: Oct 28, 2020 [[DEV Joint 2020-10-28 Webex]]
+
*DEV Domain Cochairs Meeting: May 25th, 2021 [[DEV Joint 2021-05-25 Webex]]
 
 
Technical Committee: Nov 4, 2020 [[PCD TC 2020-11-04 Webex]]
 
  
Planning Committee: Oct 13, 2020, [[PCD PC 2020-10-13 Webex]]
+
*DEV Domain Joint Meeting: May 26th, 2021 [[DEV Joint 2021-05-26 Webex]]
  
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
 
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]

Latest revision as of 16:47, 19 February 2022

PCD Home

Paul Sherman and Michael J. Kirwan, DEV Domain TPM's

Meeting Objectives

These face-to-face meetings have a number of objectives depending on the programs and committees involved:
  • DEV Domain level Discussions
  • DEV PCD Program Discussion
  • DEV PCH Program Discussion
  • DEV DPi Program Discussion
Planning Committee: Review, plan and initiate PCD activities; contribute to planning of the HIMSS Interoperability Showcase and other Showcases and events; recruit vendors and users.
Technical Committee: Review and adopt brief profile proposals; Adjourn Joint PC&TC meeting. contribute to Connectathon test tools, tests, and procedures.

Location & General Schedule

Location:
- Virtual via Webex (Info below)


Dates
- To assist European participants, all meetings(except the Pump WG) will be morning meetings, with a meeting on Friday.
the times will be 9AM EDT - 1PM EDT
  • Monday : Pump Meeting (Noon to 3pm Eastern)
  • Wednesday : PCD Planning Committee (9am to 1pm Eastern)
  • Thursday, : PCD Technical Committee (9am to 1pm Eastern)
  • Friday, : Joint DEV Domain meeting (PCD+DPi+PCH)(9am to 1pm Eastern)
The schedule is proposed; actual meeting times may change during the week.
Daily Schedule - All times Eastern Daylight Time (US)
  • 09:00 - 11:00 Session #1
  • 11:15 - 13:00 Session #2

Agenda Suggestions

Please submit suggestions for agenda topics here or through emails to the committee co-chairs.

From the DEV PCD PC Action Items PCD Planning Committee Action Items:

No current open Action Items

From the DEV PCD TC Action Items: PCD Technical Committee Action Items:

196 Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
200 MDS and VMD Requirements
202 MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional

Webex Support

Because of COVID-19, these meetings will be held via Webex. The links are provided below.

Reminders: the IP agreement is in force, and participation counts toward voting rights.

Please note: the log in and phone number for each meeting is the same as for our WG meetings. The password is included in the email sent to participants. These are not provided here for security reasons (this is a public Wiki page).

The IHE Webex page is [IHE Webex]

DEV PCD Meeting Archive 2021s
  • Monday, April 26: IHE DEV April'21 vF2F: DEV PCD Pump WG: Meeting Number: 167 728 8656
  • Wednesday April 28: DEV PCD PC: Meeting Number: 167 892 6443
  • Thursday April 29: DEV PCD TC: Meeting Number: 167 419 4377
  • Friday, April 30: DEV Domain joint: Meeting Number: 167 109 3080

Updated 4/12/2021 KE

Updated 4/19/2021 MJK

Attachments / Materials

Documents related to the meeting when available will be found at the [Devices Google Drive] unless otherwise noted. Documents are available without a password.

Schedule/Deadlines: Patient Care Device and Domain Milestones

PCD PC Action Items PCD Planning Committee Action Items. Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

PCD TC Action Items PCD Technical Committee Action Items. Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Detailed Schedule & Agenda

Monday, April 26 (PCD Pump Workgroup)

Date Hours Committees Topics
Monday Pt. 1 12:00 - 1:30 PCD Pump workgroup
  • Pump Terms containment model update - .5 hr
2020-02-24.DMC.1m.2021-01-18T17.final.corrected-MDC_MOC_BATT.xls
PumpNumDevTerms.x2c.2020-12-02T18.UoM.Enums-CommonTermsAdded.etc.xls
  • Rack/Pillar/Stack terms and CP - .5 hr
_04_19_2020_CP-PCD-nnn-PUMP_Slots-Racks-Pillars.doc
  • Units of measure - .5 hr
How are the UOM codes below used?
_UOM_DOSE_CONC
_UOM_DOSE_QUAN
Break 1:30 - 1:40 PM
Monday Pt. 2 1:40 PM - 3:10 PM Meeting Continued
  • Discussion of new terms for Maintenance (used for flush, prime, and KVO) - .5 hr
Events that occur during a flush (stop, pause, alerts)
Flush volume in PCD-03 with multiple meds
How to indicate a different fluid source (flush) vs a separate order
  • Discussion of new terms for Relay - .5 hr
How does switching sources and devices apply to relay
  • RTMMS ENUM description updates- .5 hr
Pump_enum_descriptions.xlsx
  • 3:10 > Meeting Adjournment


Wednesday April 28, 2021

Quarter Time Lead Agenda Items
Wednesday Pt. 1 09:00 - 11:15 AM DEV PCD Planning Committee (PC)
  • 09:00 > Start DEV PCD PC meeting
  • Introduction
- IHE IP Management Process (5 minutes)(Kurt)
- Review & Approve PC Agenda (Kurt)
General PCD Work Program Review (statuses, plans only, details during TC sessions):
- General update on PCD TF Vol 10 (John R)
- ACM (Monroe P)
- MEM DMC (Monroe P)
- MEM LS (Monroe P)
- WCM (Paul Schluter)
- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
- RTM (Paul Schluter)
- Vent (Paul Schluter)
- PIV (Kurt)
- IPEC (Kurt)
- Pump (Kurt)
- PCIM (John R)
- Physio monitor (John R)
- DEC (John R)
  • DEC OPTION: FHIR (Todd C)
- EC (John R)
- DCM Pulse Oximetry
  • Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT.
Break 11:15 - 11:30 AM
Wednesday Pt. 2 11:30 AM - 1:00 PM DEV PCD Planning Committee (PC)
11:30 >
- Review current Action Item: PCD Planning Committee Action Items:
None as of 4/26/2021
Adjourn Planning Committee meeting

Thursday April 29, 2021

Quarter Time Lead Agenda Items
Thursday Pt. 1 09:00 - 11:00 AM
  • 09:00 > Open DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
TC Welcome and Agenda Review (Tom Kowalczyk)
Announcement – Decision Making meeting (TC Co-Chairs)
  • DEV PCD Program review:
Update PCD TF Vol 10 (John R)
ACM (Monroe P)
MEM DMC (Monroe P)
MEM LS (Monroe P)
DEC (John R)
EC (John R)
PIV (Kurt)
IPEC (Kurt)
Pump (Kurt)
Physio monitor (John R)
PCIM (John R)
Vent (Paul Schluter)
IDCO (Alexander Kraus)
RTM (Paul Schluter)
RTM model update (Michael Faughn)
Quiet Hospital
Break 11:00 - 11:15 AM
Thursday, Pt. 2 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM DEV PCD Technical Committee (TC)
  • 11:00 Farewell Send-off to Paul Sherman
  • 11:15 > Continued topic discussions
PCD TC Action item review
196 Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
200 MDS and VMD Requirements
202 MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional

Friday, April 30, 2021 DEV Domain

Quarter Time Lead Agenda Items
Friday Pt. 1 09:00 - 11:00 Joint IHE Devices (DEV) Meeting
  • 09:00 > IHE IP Management Process (Kurt)
  • 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
  • 09:20 > Welcome (15 minutes)
  • 09:30 > Program Reports (20 minutes each)
09:30 PCD
09:50 PCH
10:10 DPI


Break 11:15 - 11:25 AM
Friday, Pt. 2 11:15 AM - 1:00 PM
  • 11:25 > Continued topic discussions
  • IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
  • Review 2021/2022 Milestones - [1]
  • Domain Discussions
DEV Domain Rosters and transition to new tools (Confluence and Zoom, possibly other).

Reference: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AWuSbQ5H9gxM_6fmalPoo90Z6fxUjcoN

F2F Action Review (from this week)
- DEV - PCD Program
If approved, schedules for Fall 2021 F2F
Next F2F -
  • Week of Oct ?? , 2021
  • Plan on In Person F2F



Note: Time slot TBD: IDCO

Participants

Monday April 26

Chair: Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
Participants: Al Engelbert (BBraun), Bill Haralson (Smiths), Brian Sullivan(BD), Brian Witkowski (BBraun), Caroline Cornelius (Baxter), Dan Kernan (Epic), Jeff Rinda (Interoperability Solutions), Lisa Digget (BD), Marufur Rahmen (ICU), Paul Schluter (), Shantanu Chawla (BD), Tom Kowalczyk (BBraun);

Wednesday, April 28

Chair: Kurt Elliason (Smiths Medical)
Participants:

Thursday, April 29

Chair:
Participants:

Friday, April 30

Chair:
Participants:

Discussion

Discussion Summaries do not require formal approval, while minutes of meetings where votes are taken do. Participants are encouraged to review and bring up significant issues with discussion summaries of previous meetings. Votes will be taken to approve meetings where votes took place; these may be email ballots.

Monday Pump WG Meeting

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
Reviewed IHE IP Management Process

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Pump Terms containment model update
Status/Discussion:
Reviewed status of terms and 10101b update.
Pump terms are final, have REFIDs and descriptions assigned. 10101b is working on ventilator terms expect it to be a few months yet before it is ready for final comments and balloting.
3 Rack/Pillar/Stack terms and CP
Status/Discussion:
Review of proposed CP content.
Identifies number of pillars and which direction (horizontal or vertical pillars)
split pillar definitions from pump location. Pillar info goes in MDS, pump detail in VMD
clarified several enums
4 Units of measure
Status/Discussion:
The constructs _UOM_DOSE_CONC and _UOM_DOSE_QUAN specify groups of units-of-measure that may be referenced by a METRIC observation or setting.  Any unit-of-measure belonging the specified _group may be used.  These are all documented on the NIST RTMMSv1 but may have been updated by the infusion pump WG.
Other possibly missing units were reviewed.
  • mgPE
  • Vials
  • Kunit
  • kunit/kg
  • EU
  • EU/kg
  • mcal
  • mcal/kg
  • kIU
  • kIU/kg
  • mIU  
  • mIU/kg
  • IU
  • IU/kg
International unit exist in the list. [iU] Paul referred to notes in IEEE11073 other units are identified by [USP] and [arb'U]
BD to follow up on mgPE, UCUM units may be extensible.
Vials are a question that requires further discussion. How are they different from syringes or other containers. Isn't the contents of the vial also in another UOM already?
Need more definition on EU
Kunit is this USP, IU or arb'U?
Some updates needed to list
4 entries have /hr instead of /h and not in a group
kcal and cal not in a group
_UOM_DOSE_QUAN_CALORIC
_UOM_DOSE_RATE_CALORIC
Will schedule time for more discussion of units during a regular pump WG session.
5 Discussion of new terms for Maintenance (used for flush, prime, and KVO)
Status/Discussion:
Adding new term to _MDC_PUMP_NOT_DELIVERING_REASON for pump-stopped-flushing
Consider adding new term to _MDC_PUMP_DELIV_STAT for pump-delivery-status-priming, needs more discussion and a complete description.
Will schedule time during a regular pump WG session for further discussion on flush and priming.
6 Discussion of new terms for Relay
Status/Discussion:
Adding new term to _MDC_PUMP_NOT_DELIVERING_REASON for pump-stopped-switching-device
Reviewed CP -148 that added some new terms for Relay. 148 was not included in Revision 9, should by in Revision 10.
Use of PCD-03 to program pumps was not included in the initial CP, only documentation. More work needs to be done in order to program a relay across multiple pumps using PCD-03.
7 RTMMS ENUM description updates
Status/Discussion:
New terms were proposed during the WG meeting but time ran out before the full list could be reviewed. Will schedule time during a regular pump WG session.


8
Status/Discussion:
Pump WG F2F meeting adjourned at 3:10


Action(s): See above


Wednesday DEV PCD PC Meeting Summary

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
Kurt Elliason reviewed the IHE IP Management Process
Introductions and Agenda Review

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary or Approval of Minutes
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
Minutes approved

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Agenda Items
-
Status/Discussion:
- General update on PCD TF Vol 10 (John R)
Working with Todd on new Vol 1 material. Implementing SDPI material. John lost access to info on his Philips computer, which affected his Vol 2 work. Reconstructing it now and will push to Github. John will provide the publish date soon. It will include all CPs to date? Yes.
- ACM (Rob and Monroe P)
Have a list of 8 or 9 items, mostly technical. Also have a list of planning items:
- Nurse call - have 3 interested parties and have implemented in products. Hope to get them into the working group. Ascom a bit interested. Hill Rom is in CNs but need to contact them. Rauland is also a possibility. Nurse call vs. Alert Manager? Biggest difference is different type of alerts, generally not physiologic (Advisories). Actual alarms are a grey area. Nurse call is an AR, but can be AM via aggregating medical equipment alerts.
- Bed vendors - Talked to Hill-Rom and Stryker. Awaiting regular participation. They're interested, but not engaged yet.
- Documenting Lab and Radfiology results - There's a need for it. Have discussed with Radiology vendors plus some Neuro vendors. Most use proprietary interfaces, with no HL7 experience. PACS often have HL7 interfaces. There are some challenges adopting HL7; mACM hasn't been commercially implemented yet. Some discussion regarding immunization; ACM not really involved, perhaps if the patients become ACM recipients.
- Still pursuing need for AC actor in NIST tools. Often at risk of not passing CN.
- MEM DMC (Monroe P)
Some background on original focus (CMMS). Expanding into other utilization.
- MEM LS (Monroe P)
Location 'tags' are getting smarter, providing other signals and info. Can send info to CMMS as well as LS system. Can be helpful for utilization.
- WCM (Paul Schluter)
Nothing new happening, it's being tested and used. With vent terms, could provide more info.
- IDCO (Paul Schluter)
Terminology revision mostly done, working with Michael Faughn to get them into RTMMS. Trying to sort out what is within standard terms and what's beyond that. Boston Scientific signed up for CN, but weren't able to test. Hopefully next time.
- RTM and Vents (Paul Schluter)
Have some notes and will put on Google Drive. Paul has worked with vent vendors to come up with a standardized model. Group 7 has some terms. Paul has set a deadline for new terms for this round. Will set up a ballot after that. Working with Dialysis, making progress and have a good approach. They're pushing terms to their industry.
- PIV (Kurt)
Nothing major planned
- IPEC (Kurt)
In FT for about a year. Discussing new terms. Nothing major.
- Pump (Kurt)
F2F on Monday. Notes in wiki. Working on some standardized numbering of pump 'stack' ID'd some missing units. Need to add some 'kilo' terms, as well as some for relays and flushes. Found some RTMMS enumerations that need cleaning up.
- PCIM (Tom and John R)
Workgroup starting up again. Focusing on pump-patient association. Goal to have something for the 2022 HIMSS conference (Orlando). Monroe - If interested in correlating people/equipment and location, there are some OBX identifiers for accuracy. Can use MEMLS work. There is a mechanism to set a location accuracy level. Question - Pump pulls info from PCD 16, is it accurate enough? MEMLS does provide the instances, but they're optional. Dalibor - confidence is provided via PCD-16 is at core of IEEE LS workgroup. Discussed accuracy of RTLS systems. The work on this will likely end up in multiple standards. John has set the base and the workgroup is running with it. Paul Sch - It would be great if the IEEE group can provide some background on where their work is and how it'll work with MEMLS and PCIM. Monroe - This may be beyond the scope of what IHE works on - let IEEE define the technology and accuracy requirements. IEEE group will provide method for vendors to identify their accuracy. 'Policing' will need to be via RTLS users. Rather extensive technical discussion on RTLS processes and technologies.
- Physio monitor (John R)
Some things are done, some things that they want to do, but we really need customer feedback. Need to ask ourselves - where's the pull and whose willing to sign up and do the work? had occaisions of strong pushback (good). What ought to be done now?
- DEC (John R)
Some things are done, some things that they want to do, but we really need customer feedback. Need to ask ourselves - where's the pull and whose willing to sign up and do the work? Need terms finalized. Paul Sch - invest resources into containment models. There are a lot of the pieces, but it needs to be tied together. We're very close to have something computable.
- DEC OPTION: FHIR (Todd C)
HL7 work underway for Devices on FHIR. Some skepticism due to large volumes of data. Some use cases can use this process. HL7 DEV Meeting Archive 2021 - discussing with anesthesiology community; have a small space of people seeing all info and a challenging patient. A different model from what we usually do. Their value is in looking at data after the case. FHIR could be a good model for this. Many are working on this. IHE and HL7 are working on joining the threads together. Todd proposes to write an IHE version of the HL7 work. Feedback: PCD needs to monitor and provide input as needed. Some PCD lessons being ignored. MEMLS is an example; they don't want the detail that is needed. Not sure it's valuable for Device - Device comms; not really set up for that. FHIR would be great for query based Profiles. Not good for sending models. Need to distinguish between FHIR core and implementations, FHIR has an 'escape hatch', extensibility. It's fairly well managed so far, to avoid full fragmentation. Still could collapse under it's own weight, but does have some control to limit the risk. John G provided some conformance background and how well we are doing with it.
- EC (John R)
- DCM Pulse Oximetry
  • Currently waiting for someone to take it to FT.
- Review current Action Item: PCD Planning Committee Action Items:
None as of 4/26/2021


Decisions/Issues:


Action(s):

Please review notes and and propose Action Items.

Thursday PCD TC Meeting Summary

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved
Meeting concluded on Thursday

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary
- Chair
Status/Discussion:


Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):

3 Agenda Items
-
Status/Discussion:
  • DEV PCD Program review:
Update PCD TF Vol 10 (John R)
ACM (Monroe P)
- The cutoff v9 was cp146, now at CP 150, to pass word docs to John. Taking some time to get to these docs. Action: Michael to update the Wiki site: https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/PCD_CP_grid.
- PCD ACM last change was for PCD-05.
MEM DMC (Monroe P)
- Nothing here.
MEM LS (Monroe P)
- Nothing here.
DEC (John R)
- John noted that Todd advocating for (mail liaison between IHE and HL7, specifically devices). There is the Gemini project (peace making between IHE and HL7 operations). Attempt to harmonize technical content. What’s not there in HL7 is an implementation guide specifically on devices (for HL7 v2). FHIR is a successor for HL7 V2 and replacement for V3 (not fully the truth but close). FHIR is meant to be more simple and follows practices of modern computing (RestFULL, etc.). Elements may or may not be there in FHIR. HL7 V2 has been quite successful in special needs for data flows in acute care. Will likely be the traffic of the future (not broke no need to fix). There are scenarios and usecases that ppl want (e.g., mobile clients that want access to medical record data). This has been nicely worked out with the SmartonFHIR group. FHIR becoming the lead for clinical decision support. A lot of the work is redundant. ITI and patient care is getting done both ways (both V2 and FHIR). DEC Profile could be recognized in HL7. We may be asking IHE to make an HL7 FHIR IG.
EC (John R)
- Event communication: John in IPEC, similar transfers in non-infusion pump, so the basics. John has no direct experience in IPEC. If someone with IPEC experience and lead 2 or 3 meetings and see what we should say. In the TF this could be a pattern. The EC text would be a guidance, let’s do this in the IPEC way. John asks if there are experts that would be willing to sit in a few meetings and help. Tom asked the group for thoughts on John’s comments.
- We’re solving a problem that may/may not come up in future. There may not be another in the future. We haven’t seen a new IPEC thing coming so far, so may be better to wait. May be best to place on the shelf for now. There are other projects on the list to get done sooner. We can revisit this in 6 months or so (so at a future TC or PC meeting). No objections. Decided to bring this up again at next week’s TC meeting. This will give people a couple of weeks to assess. We can decide after that what we will do going forward.
PIV (Kurt)
- Kurt presented slides. Working on terms and their descriptions/definitions (relay, flushing, etc). Additionally working on a CP for pillar/rack terms. Tom to have this CP out by the end of next week. They are also looking at clarifying units (some missing). Paul noted that some of the units need to be assessed (such as vials). Others may want to way in on this. Lisa noted that vials are very specific, so important here. Is there a way if we used vials. Paul noted that vials could be something like its own unit of measure. Lisa working on this for the next meeting.
IPEC (Kurt)
Pump (Kurt)
DPI (John R)
- Its own operation. Todd not here. We will discuss tomorrow.
Physio monitor (John R)
- John noted discussed yesterday. We need to get this in a computable form and reflected in containment tree.
PCIM (John R)
- In the planning realm. We have a technical profile being implemented and various companies are demonstrating it, next year. Tom noted there is interest in moving this forward (HIMSS 2022), so feel free to join recurring meetings.
Vent (Paul Schluter)
- Paul presented slides recapping nomenclature -10101b extension and their provisional groups (5 groups, see slides). He noted that the provisional codes and Ref ID take significant discussion to ensure they are legal codes. In the future if we see errant codes they can be flagged. This is an extended containment model spanning the entire IEEE 11073-10101*
- Presentation on Google Drive. Would like to stay with vendor approved mappings. Many good examples are available. Plan to discuss Aux mode variables in meetings in the next two weeks. A lot of hard/heavy listing is done - a major accomplishment. It's possible to define a stream to define SQI from 0-100, will be helpful for several use cases. Some are good MS and PhD projects. Extensive discussion of possibilities and future progress. Think about how this can be used (medico-legal). Hemo - signing off on final terms. Will work on orders next. Plan to borrow as much from PCD-03 as much as possible. Implanted devices - Regrouped, am working with Michael Faughn.
IDCO (Graig Reiser) - not available
RTM model update (Michael Faughn/John G)
- Presentation on Google Drive. Working with IDCO, working on terms that belong in RTM vs. Implementation guides. In general what's available - wouldn't notice much change. Been working on framework a lot, solving problems. User Permissions - need more types of access than is currently available. Currently all or nothing. Demo'd term checking mechanism. Search results - currently will show top 10, but will download all of them. Should be finished this week. John G - User permissions; user roles would be similar to existing in NIST. Dockerizing - Continue IEEE royalty free agreement and IEEE-LOINC mappings. next version enables access to those terms and enable FHIR access to keep medical terminology as 'single source of truth'. Please tell Michael how to build tools. John G - once RTMMS v2 is up - NIST gives feedback and encourage everyone to do so.
- NIST - Provided stats on current status. Have all 11073 terms. Site continues to grow (Thanks Paul Schluter)
Quiet Hospital (Rob)
- A couple of status meetings. Will start on HIMSS vignette soon. No activity at CN, so no data there. All related CPs passed. Post-HIMSS; hope to have user input to help guide progress. Tom - have video available for on-demand viewing at HIMSS21. It is available to view now at: https://confluence.hl7.org/display/GP/Narrative%3A++Quiet+Hospital
PCD TC Action item review
196 Add PCD specific values to HL7 table 78
- Found a new way to work on this. They have weekly meetings, so will try to get it on their agenda. Hope to make progress by HL7 meeting week last of May. Review June 2.
200 MDS and VMD Requirements
- Coupled with Michael Faughn's availability. Been capturing terms at various workgroup meetings. Set to August meeting.
202 MEMDMC CP to make PID and PV1 segments optional
- Passed it into HL7 Orders and Observations, out of their hands now. Has Monroe contacted Hans? John will send his contact to Monroe. Set to June meeting.

New Topic - Next possible F2F. Tom would like an actual F2F, thoughts? On tomorrow's agenda, but think about it.

Decisions/Issues:


Action(s):


Friday DEV Joint Meeting Summary

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda approved

Action(s):

2 Discussion Summary
- Chair
Status/Discussion:
 09:00 > IHE IP Management Process (Kurt)
- Reviewed IP page.
- Kurt led the call.
 09:05 > Introductions and Agenda Review (Kurt and Thom)
- There are 18 people on the call. Each introduced themselves.
 09:20 > Welcome (15 minutes)
 09:30 > Program Reports (20 minutes each)
 09:30 PCD
- Kurt presented slides for PCD, see link here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yE4gSja3Uj11lszM1z4Ur-N3FQLWj3cO/view?usp=sharing. For Quiet Hospital, we will have a Interoperability Showcase at HIMSS (a vignette).
- Rob noted looking forward to getting this out in the community. Lack of participation at the last NA Connectathon but HIMSS should provide with an opportunity to do this. Now in a lull on technical updates. We will pick-up a use-case design in the coming months.
- Rob would love to see SDPi incorporated in a future Vignette)
- Infusion pump now a trial implementation.
- Todd questioned the challenges they’ve seen. Kurt noted is in getting feedback from the community. Hoping that HIMSS will have a good showing. Todd also noted giving ACCE Webinar. It may be a good opportunity to run a survey again. They may be interested in partnering with us. Independent and running under the clinical engineering community (ACCE). Todd to help kick this off. The nursing and pharma groups would be good as well.
 09:50 PCH
- Thom presented PCH slides. See link here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w1vVlEPL4Im894vLmKTTmJwCXNDLFGl7/view?usp=sharing
- Todd questioned if the videos for the IHE USA Personal Health Track at the IHE NA Connectathon are also available.
- Todd questioned the Continua Test Tool integration with the Gazelle TM tool.
- Todd questioned if there would be an IHE Profile based on the IEEE ACOM spec. Ken noted that he keeps pushing the IEEE groups. Most are not getting down to the protocol level (most higher). Todd suggested this is more semantic interoperability. Paul Schluter noted that they have worked with the ISO 22923 group who is also looking at the higher layers.
- Todd noted that they have been doing Plugathons and questioned if PCH was doing similar things for D2C Constrained. Michael noted that Amit is planning a Plugathon later this year so D2C Constrained may be a good candidate (per the IHE ONC CoAg). Ken questioned if related to ACOM. Thom noted there are two companies doing implementations. Thom noted that one of the reasons we’re doing this is to make this easier for implementers but the very market we’re approaching does not have the resources to help. Todd noted that there’s the TC215 Personalized Digital Informatics so the PCH work helps. This would be difficult to spec as the business drivers are changing on a daily basis. Thom noted that they are integrating with existing clinical workflows and other key use-cases.
 10:10 DPI
- Todd presented slides. See link to the slides here:
- Rob questioned the conformity assessment: Regarding the FDA’s focus on intended use and workflow has it been discussed how that would work? Todd noted that the ASCA project is focused on the 60601 series. They’ve not looked at interoperability at the current time. Several of these standards are not registered FDA SDOs. Todd believes that it would be based on your claim to the FDA. This work should help the FDA out. Perhaps IHE certification may be possible at some point.
- Monroe questioned how soon with DPI be implemented? Todd noted later this year. Will it support PCD-05. Yes, planned to be included. Most integrate with ACM based managed systems. There are some products in the world that do SDC stuff, including alerting.
- Todd provided the link to the video presented during the F2F: https://confluence.hl7.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=109546326
 IHE International Board - Update & Feedback (Todd)
- Todd started by noting he would like to share a few topics. Elliot Sloan, John Donnelly have been very helpful on the devices side. How are we doing to provide value to each of you at the F2F? New members are steady and increasing (John, Lisa and Paul Schluter). Budget doing well. The CA steering committee working infographics and videos. Working on a better home for on-demand streaming that we can send people to. IHE catalyst should be good for the org in the future. Showcases and Connectathons are discussed at the Board level. eHealth for Interoperability of IHE/HIMSS Global Consortium being expanded and now engaging with the WHO but this is still in the formative stage. They may be able to provide more funding opportunities. Currently no good way of doing this in IHE.
 Review 2021/2022 Milestones - [1]
- Kurt reviewed milestones. Discussed dates. This is now more on-demand than in the past.
 Domain Discussions
-DEV Domain Rosters and transition to new tools (Confluence and Zoom, possibly other).Reference: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AWuSbQ5H9gxM_6fmalPoo90Z6fxUjcoN
- Michael noted that this was initially brought up by Rob. Javier then requested that we discuss this during the vF2F. Monroe noted that we don’t get notified of membership (who joins or leaves). Kurt questioned that we start a new list. Rob would move to have a PC and TC list consolidated then extract information from IHE. Until profiles get mature this will continue to be a problem. Paul Sherman noted that requirements for active voting meetings and on ballots. The list we have is only for use for DEV level. Rob noted that this may be a PC item to help clean-up (temporary solution), so they could likely clean up this list quickly. Todd recalled that in the past that Celina used to manage these lists. We don’t get the contact info for new members and for which are interested in DEV. This needs to be taken back to Amit. Need an automated system. Belongs above the Domain, at IHE. We need to get this fixed as this won’t set well with the orgs like the FDA. See if we can get Amit in a future PC or TC call. Todd has a call with John and Elliot later today so will have a 5m chat on how to approach this challenge. Javier added that we have an additional challenge with 3 programs so this increases the IHE Domain complexity. There is a funding question and a leadership need. There are tools out there. Reviewed the DEV Ballot Roster 2020-SEP in google drive (and made some updates).
- Kurt noted that after we get the list we can scrub the google groups as well.
- Javier questioned how often the IHE membership list was updated. No one on the call really knows. Monroe noted that he had to poke IHE to have them shown on the list. John noted that after joining that there was no email notification. Todd will discuss this as well on his call.
- Both Chris Carr and Amit have previously mentioned that we would be moving from WikiMedia to Confluence and from IHE Webex to IHE Zoom. Todd talked to how they use Jira and Confluence at HL7. This would be fantastic.


 F2F Action Review (from this week)
- DEV - PCD Program
- If approved, schedules for Fall 2021 F2F
 Next F2F -
- Week of Oct ?? , 2021
- Plan on In Person F2F

Decisions/Issues:


 Actions
- Reviewed actions list. No current open actions. We will add the actions above.
- Fall F2F
- It may be possible to have a real F2F. Paul Schluter added NIST may be possible in October. We’ll start planning for this now (). Javier noted it may still need to be hybrid.
- There are other possible F2Fs to combine together with IEEE, IHE and the FDA.
3 Agenda Items
-
Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:


Action(s):


Action Items - PCD PC

The Action Items that follow and approved in subsequent committee meetings will be added to the committee Action Item page.

New Action Item - Incorporate EC work and guidance into TF Volume 2. Owner: John Rhoads
Five Year Plan - Do we still need it? Review at next PC meeting.
Next F2F -
  • Week of Oct **, 2021
  • Hope for F2F

Action Items - PCD TC and WGs

The Action Items that follow and approved in subsequent committee meetings will be added to the committee Action Item page.

Next Meetings