Difference between revisions of "D2C-11073-10206-LPWA-Work-Item-Proposal"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==2. The Problem==
 
==2. The Problem==
  
''Enabling personal connected health device sensor data in a constrained device (simple device with a simple processor) to send its data directly over wide area networks, beyond the reach of Bluetooth and WiFi, will provide a much more secure, trusted & direct path to providers and consumers of the data''
+
''Enabling personal connected health device sensor data in a constrained device (simple device with a simple processor) to send its data directly over wide area networks, beyond the reach of Bluetooth and WiFi, will provide a much more secure, trusted & direct path to providers and consumers of the data.''
 +
 
  
== The Cost
 
 
''The interoperable value is the removal of the 'middle man' which significantly lowers the security risk and costs. Other advantages are reliability and throughput.''
 
''The interoperable value is the removal of the 'middle man' which significantly lowers the security risk and costs. Other advantages are reliability and throughput.''
  

Revision as of 12:41, 23 September 2020

1. Proposed Workitem: Devices Direct-to-Cloud-Low Power Wide Area Wireless

  • Proposal Editor: Michael J. Kirwan
  • Editor: Tim Frost
  • Date: September 30th, 2020
  • Version: 1.0
  • Domain: DEVices

2. The Problem

Enabling personal connected health device sensor data in a constrained device (simple device with a simple processor) to send its data directly over wide area networks, beyond the reach of Bluetooth and WiFi, will provide a much more secure, trusted & direct path to providers and consumers of the data.


The interoperable value is the removal of the 'middle man' which significantly lowers the security risk and costs. Other advantages are reliability and throughput.

3. Key Use Case

<Describe a short use case scenario from the user perspective. The use case should demonstrate the integration/workflow problem.>

<Feel free to add a second use case scenario demonstrating how it “should” work. Try to indicate the people/systems, the tasks they are doing, the information they need, and hopefully where the information should come from.>


4. Standards and Systems

<List existing systems that are/could be involved in the problem/solution.>

<If known, list standards which might be relevant to the solution>

5. Discussion

<Include additional discussion or consider a few details which might be useful for the detailed proposal>

<Why IHE would be a good venue to solve the problem and what you think IHE should do to solve it.>
<What might the IHE technical approach be? Existing Actors? New Transactions? Additional Profiles?>
<What are some of the risks or open issues to be addressed?>


<This is the brief proposal. Try to keep it to 1 or at most 2 pages>


<Delete this Category Templates line since your specific Profile Proposal page is no longer a template.>