Difference between revisions of "Cross-Domain Strategic Planning Work Group Tcon Minutes 2010-10-25"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
:* Establishes personal liaisons with other domains and process to communicate
 
:* Establishes personal liaisons with other domains and process to communicate
 
:* Other domains can submit work requests to ITI for needs they have
 
:* Other domains can submit work requests to ITI for needs they have
 +
:* Breaks committee work into key themes and tracks profile development work in each theme area
  
  
Line 23: Line 24:
  
 
* Identification of Problems
 
* Identification of Problems
# Uniformity of process across committees
+
# Uniformity of process and work output across committees
 
# Coordination of committee work items
 
# Coordination of committee work items
 
::* Coordination work between ITI and clinical specialties  
 
::* Coordination work between ITI and clinical specialties  
Line 30: Line 31:
  
 
* Potential Solutions for problem #1
 
* Potential Solutions for problem #1
:* Enhance education materials and process, including Wiki, Webinars and templates (#1)
+
:* Enhance education materials and process, including Wiki, Webinars and templates  
:* Establish oversight body to enforce compliance (peer volunteer group or executive/expert review board
+
:* Establish oversight body to enforce compliance (peer volunteer group or executive/expert review board)
:* Require early, substantive cross-domain review of supplement work proposals (could use [[Domain Coordination Committee]])
 
  
 
* Potential Solutions for problem #2
 
* Potential Solutions for problem #2
 
:* Expand domain liaison relationships to link specialties and ITI
 
:* Expand domain liaison relationships to link specialties and ITI
 +
:* Require early, substantive cross-domain review of supplement work proposals (could use [[Domain Coordination Committee]])
 +
:* Perform strategic review of existing portfolio of profiles and identify gaps and overlap (for possible consolidation)
 +
  
  

Latest revision as of 09:44, 26 October 2010

Attendees

  • Chris Carr
  • Emmanuel Cordonnier
  • Mike Nusbaum
  • Kevin O'Donnell

Minutes

  • Establishes personal liaisons with other domains and process to communicate
  • Other domains can submit work requests to ITI for needs they have
  • Breaks committee work into key themes and tracks profile development work in each theme area


  • Education Materials, Wiki Pages intended to guide technical framework development processes
  • The ways committees develop profiles has diverged--How to fix?
  • Document and ask compliance?
  • Establish liaison relationships (with ITI; among all domains)
  • Establish oversight group (like DICOM WG6, HL7 Architecture Review Board)
  • Could be multiple review groups, each one based on different base standards (this could cause more "silo" issues)
  • Early cross-domain or central review of proposed work items?
  • Strategic review of overall existing inventory of profiles at domain level and identify gaps/redundancies


  • Identification of Problems
  1. Uniformity of process and work output across committees
  2. Coordination of committee work items
  • Coordination work between ITI and clinical specialties
  • Coordination among clinical specialties (liaison between all committees


  • Potential Solutions for problem #1
  • Enhance education materials and process, including Wiki, Webinars and templates
  • Establish oversight body to enforce compliance (peer volunteer group or executive/expert review board)
  • Potential Solutions for problem #2
  • Expand domain liaison relationships to link specialties and ITI
  • Require early, substantive cross-domain review of supplement work proposals (could use Domain Coordination Committee)
  • Perform strategic review of existing portfolio of profiles and identify gaps and overlap (for possible consolidation)






Cross-Domain Strategic Planning Work Group