Difference between revisions of "Card Tech Minutes 2017.06.26-28"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 44: Line 44:
 
'''For Connectathon conformance testing, how is testing against valuesets done? Does testing against valuesets require testing for at least one element in the specified  valueset of an extensible valueset since the valueset listed is not necessarily the minimum requirement and the values/valuesets are dynamic?'''
 
'''For Connectathon conformance testing, how is testing against valuesets done? Does testing against valuesets require testing for at least one element in the specified  valueset of an extensible valueset since the valueset listed is not necessarily the minimum requirement and the values/valuesets are dynamic?'''
  
:Breakout working groups.
+
:(5)Breakout working groups.

Revision as of 10:33, 27 June 2017

26-June-2017, Day 1

Attendees
Nick Gawrit, heartbase, Co-Chair, TC
Chris Melo, Philips Healthcare, Co-Chair, TC
Paul Dow, ACC, Secretary
Rebecca Baker, ACC
Antje Schroeder, Siemens Healthineers
Shinichi Nakano, Toshiba Medical Systems and IHE Japan
Takeshi Oozeki, Toshiba Medical Systems and IHE Japan
Wakita, Goodman and IHE Japan
Jamie Bourque MD, ASNC representative
Charles Thomas, University of Washington (virtual)
Abdul Malik Shakir, Hi3 Consulting (virtual)
IDCO Profile Update
There is some discussion underway to pull the IDCO profile back into the Cardiology Domain. It was pulled into the PCD domain during the shuttering of the CARD domain. It is well represented with Alex Krause, and has many people who are interested in working on the project. This will be more successful as an international effort, and with robust IHE Japan support as well as other vendors and clinicians.
Cardiac Procedure Notes (CPN) Profile Working Session
The committee consolidated and reviewed the 86 submitted comments for the CPN profile. There was some complexity in formatting the spreadsheet as the forms were submitted via different channels. Columns were added titled Status and Resolution for the triage of each item.
Reviewed the comments against the documentation in the CPN and within Art Décor.
While interpreting comments, recommendation made to have individual who made comments present during discussion and available for clarification and/or questions.
Planning for TI Publication
The Committee will separate the items into blocks for small group review to streamline the process on the morning of June 27.

27-June-2017, Day 2

Attendees
Nick Gawrit, heartbase, Co-Chair, TC
Chris Melo, Philips Healthcare, Co-Chair, TC
Paul Dow, ACC, Secretary
Rebecca Baker, ACC
Antje Schroeder, Siemens Healthineers
Shinichi Nakano, Toshiba Medical Systems and IHE Japan
Takeshi Oozeki, Toshiba Medical Systems and IHE Japan
Wakita, Goodman and IHE Japan
Jamie Bourque MD, ASNC representative
Charles Thomas, University of Washington (virtual)
Abdul Malik Shakir, Hi3 Consulting (virtual)
Minutes
Review and assignment of comments for group work
(1)Clarification of comment questions from Day 1
(2)Agree to set timeline for next two weeks as far as completion of work
(3)For future work, discussed need for clinically focused companion guide that will explain the profile and intent by section
(4)Question regarding Connectathon for Chris Carr discussion:

For Connectathon conformance testing, how is testing against valuesets done? Does testing against valuesets require testing for at least one element in the specified valueset of an extensible valueset since the valueset listed is not necessarily the minimum requirement and the values/valuesets are dynamic?

(5)Breakout working groups.