Difference between revisions of "Card Tech Minutes 2016.10.26"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:''Discussion Topics -'' | :''Discussion Topics -'' | ||
:1. Introduction of new ACC Staff member Rebecca Baker - New Health IT associate to assist and develop projects. | :1. Introduction of new ACC Staff member Rebecca Baker - New Health IT associate to assist and develop projects. | ||
| − | :2. Update on December 6, 2017, Clinical Guidelines meeting deferred until further notice | + | :2. Update on December 6, 2017, ACC Clinical Guidelines meeting - this is being deferred until further notice. The decision was made internally for the inclusion of other groups to ensure understanding of the process and possible impacts to their workflow. This may expand the 2-day TC meeting back to 3-days. |
:3. Withdrawal of the ACC Profiles for the 2017-2018 cycle due to conflicting timelines. | :3. Withdrawal of the ACC Profiles for the 2017-2018 cycle due to conflicting timelines. | ||
:4. Review of PCC profile decision matrix and a detailed proposal template - This includes information around cost benefits, which help make the case for end users wishing to implement profiles. This template also quantifies the key issues or complexities that could make the development of the profile less successful. The Risks section is very useful to help describe the challenges that impact the technical approach, especially if political or cultural changes are needed for a successful implementation, e.g. FHIR not fully baked into day-to-day technical products or workflows. | :4. Review of PCC profile decision matrix and a detailed proposal template - This includes information around cost benefits, which help make the case for end users wishing to implement profiles. This template also quantifies the key issues or complexities that could make the development of the profile less successful. The Risks section is very useful to help describe the challenges that impact the technical approach, especially if political or cultural changes are needed for a successful implementation, e.g. FHIR not fully baked into day-to-day technical products or workflows. | ||
Revision as of 10:25, 26 October 2016
Attendees
- Chris Melo, Philips, Co-chair
- Nick Gawrit, Heartbase, Co-chair
- Paul Dow, ACC, Secretary
- Dan Murphy, Epic
- Antje Schroeder, Siemens
- Charles Thomas, University of Washington
- Andrea Price, Indiana University Health
- Rebecca Baker, ACC
- Pamela Heller, ACC
Minutes
- Discussion Topics -
- 1. Introduction of new ACC Staff member Rebecca Baker - New Health IT associate to assist and develop projects.
- 2. Update on December 6, 2017, ACC Clinical Guidelines meeting - this is being deferred until further notice. The decision was made internally for the inclusion of other groups to ensure understanding of the process and possible impacts to their workflow. This may expand the 2-day TC meeting back to 3-days.
- 3. Withdrawal of the ACC Profiles for the 2017-2018 cycle due to conflicting timelines.
- 4. Review of PCC profile decision matrix and a detailed proposal template - This includes information around cost benefits, which help make the case for end users wishing to implement profiles. This template also quantifies the key issues or complexities that could make the development of the profile less successful. The Risks section is very useful to help describe the challenges that impact the technical approach, especially if political or cultural changes are needed for a successful implementation, e.g. FHIR not fully baked into day-to-day technical products or workflows.
- 5. Implantable Medical Device Registration (IMDR) proposal - PCC will be reviewing the 3 proposals related to medical device identification and discuss the possibility of combining them. They will also be developing the detailed proposals for the IMDR. Cardiology is interested in this proposal and would be willing to work with PCC on this topic. Chris will attend the PCC face-to-face meeting to discuss the possibility of collaboration with the PCC domain on this effort.
- Next Steps -
- Nick and Chris will develop the detailed proposals for CRC and CIRC for next week. Based on that we will be able to plan for the December meeting.
- Anyone interested in helping develop these proposals or contributing to these work items should contact Nick or Chris via e-mail.